02.06.2013 Views

NAVFAC P-300 Management of Transportation Equipment

NAVFAC P-300 Management of Transportation Equipment

NAVFAC P-300 Management of Transportation Equipment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42.5 Maintenance Program Evaluation<br />

a. Maintenance Guidelines. An activity’s maintenance program should be<br />

continually evaluated to ensure that it is effective. Guidelines and tools for program<br />

evaluation that the Maintenance Supervisor may use are listed below.<br />

(1)<br />

Mechanic-to-<strong>Equipment</strong> Ratio. The ratio indicates the number <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanics assigned compared to the number <strong>of</strong> vehicles assigned to a location. In<br />

addition to all the mechanics assigned to the shop, the title “mechanic” in this ratio<br />

includes all administrative and supervisory maintenance personnel and any personnel<br />

assigned to work with the mechanics, such as steelworkers, machinery repairmen, and<br />

electricians. The ratios can be used as a general yardstick to determine if additional<br />

mechanics may be required to maintain the unit’s equipment adequately. Obviously<br />

many factors such as training, experience, environment, and equipment condition will<br />

cause the optimum ratio to vary. However, experience shows that the ratio should<br />

average approximately one mechanic to five pieces <strong>of</strong> equipment at each location. One<br />

way to improve the on-site mechanic to equipment ratio is through the use <strong>of</strong> the live<br />

storage program (see Appendix N).<br />

(2)<br />

PM-to-Repair Ratio. This ratio shows the number <strong>of</strong> scheduled<br />

maintenance actions performed compared to unscheduled maintenance actions<br />

(interim repairs). The ratio can be used as a primary indicator <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a<br />

unit’s preventive maintenance program. The PM Clerk can compute the PM-to-repair<br />

ratio from the ERO log. Ideally there should be many more PMs performed than interim<br />

repairs. Experience indicates that a unit, operating on a 40-day PM schedule, should<br />

average approximately three scheduled PM inspections to each interim repair: a ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> three to one. If the ratio drops below three to one, the preventive maintenance<br />

program should be reviewed for the following problems: inadequate scheduling, not<br />

adhering to the schedule, not performing the proper depth <strong>of</strong> PM, and inadequate shop<br />

quality control. The closer the ratio comes to one to one, the more ineffective the PM<br />

program becomes.<br />

(3)<br />

<strong>Equipment</strong> Availability. <strong>Equipment</strong> availability is the percentage<br />

that shows the time the equipment is available to be dispatched as compared to<br />

downtime. <strong>Equipment</strong> downtime is figured on a 24-hour, 7-day-week basis. <strong>Equipment</strong><br />

availability <strong>of</strong> a unit at 90 percent is considered excellent, 85 percent is good, 80<br />

percent is fair, and 75 percent is poor. <strong>Equipment</strong> with a fair availability record should<br />

be analyzed to determine the cause, such as overwork or abuse, inadequate COSAL<br />

(Consolidated Seabee Allowance List) or supply support, or shortage <strong>of</strong> mechanics.<br />

b. Maintenance Schedule. Ensure that all vehicles receive maintenance. If<br />

the shop is on a 40-day PM schedule each vehicle should receive maintenance about<br />

once every 8 weeks. Frequently check to ensure that all vehicles are on the PM<br />

schedule and that the schedule is being followed.<br />

4-2-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!