05.07.2013 Views

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

District Attorney<br />

Steve Cooley, District Attorney<br />

District Attorney <strong>Budget</strong> Summary<br />

DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUDGET SUMMARY<br />

Mission Statement<br />

The District Attorney of Los Angeles County, as a constitutional<br />

officer and the public prosecutor acting on behalf of the<br />

people, is vested with the independent power to conduct<br />

prosecutions for public offenses, to detect crime and to<br />

investigate criminal activity. The District Attorney advises the<br />

Grand Jury in its investigations. By law, the District Attorney<br />

sponsors and participates in programs to improve the<br />

administration of justice.<br />

The District Attorney fulfills these responsibilities through the<br />

efforts of the employees of the <strong>Office</strong> of the District Attorney.<br />

Each employee shall adopt the highest standards of ethical<br />

behavior and professionalism. Each employee, moreover, is<br />

integral to achieving the Department’s mission and shares the<br />

District Attorney's obligation to enhance the fundamental<br />

right of the people of Los Angeles County to a safe and just<br />

society. At all times, the mission shall be carried out in a fair,<br />

evenhanded and compassionate manner.<br />

2011-12 <strong>Budget</strong> Message<br />

DISTRICT ATTORNEY<br />

<strong>Budget</strong> Summaries<br />

FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2011-12 CHANGE FROM<br />

CLASSIFICATION ACTUAL ESTIMATED BUDGET REQUESTED RECOMMENDED BUDGET<br />

FINANCING USES<br />

SALARIES & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $ 308,025,229.21 $ 299,462,000 $ 299,488,000 $ 300,762,000 $ 285,404,000 $ (14,084,000)<br />

SERVICES & SUPPLIES 36,626,049.48 33,601,000 33,601,000 33,414,000 33,414,000 (187,000)<br />

OTHER CHARGES 294,947.94 998,000 998,000 998,000 998,000 0<br />

CAPITAL ASSETS - EQUIPMENT 756,114.71 360,000 610,000 575,000 575,000 (35,000)<br />

GROSS TOTAL $ 345,702,341.34 $ 334,421,000 $ 334,697,000 $ 335,749,000 $ 320,391,000 $ (14,306,000)<br />

INTRAFUND TRANSFERS (12,338,171.18) (12,539,000) (12,996,000) (12,123,000) (12,123,000) 873,000<br />

NET TOTAL $ 333,364,170.16 $ 321,882,000 $ 321,701,000 $ 323,626,000 $ 308,268,000 $ (13,433,000)<br />

REVENUE 131,698,716.74 128,628,000 128,447,000 131,683,000 128,985,000 538,000<br />

NET COUNTY COST $ 201,665,453.42 $ 193,254,000 $ 193,254,000 $ 191,943,000 $ 179,283,000 $ (13,971,000)<br />

BUDGETED POSITIONS 2,163.0 2,142.0 2,142.0 2,273.0 2,106.0 (36.0)<br />

FUND FUNCTION ACTIVITY<br />

GENERAL FUND PUBLIC PROTECTION JUDICIAL<br />

The 2011-12 <strong>Recommended</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> reflects a net County cost<br />

reduction of $14.0 million primarily due to the elimination of<br />

costs associated with the 1994 Pension Obligation Bonds, the<br />

elimination of 19.0 positions needed to address the County’s<br />

projected structural deficit for fiscal year (FY) 2011-12 and the<br />

partial suspension of the County’s deferred compensation<br />

contribution. The <strong>Recommended</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> also reflects a<br />

decrease of 17.0 positions due to a reduction in various grants<br />

as the termination of a Memorandum of Understanding<br />

between the District Attorney and the Child Support Services<br />

Department for the Child Support Arrest Warrant Project. The<br />

overall decrease in net County cost is partially offset by<br />

Board-approved increases in health insurance subsidies and<br />

changes to salaries and an increase of $1.8 million in public<br />

safety sales tax receipts. The retirement of the 1994 Pension<br />

Obligation Bonds reflects both a reduction in funding and<br />

expense. This funding is no longer required because this debt<br />

obligation has been fully paid. Elimination of this funding and<br />

its equivalent expense does not impact the Department’s<br />

operating budget.<br />

FY 2011-12 <strong>Recommended</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>One</strong> 19.1 County of Los Angeles

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!