05.07.2013 Views

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

Recommended Budget Volume One.book - Chief Executive Office ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Critical/Strategic Planning Initiatives<br />

The Auditor-Controller advocates for fiscal responsibility and<br />

service excellence through various initiatives, including:<br />

■ Ensuring public trust in County government by implementing<br />

the Board-approved annual audit plan and conducting<br />

investigations of fraud and malfeasance;<br />

■ Working with the <strong>Chief</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Office</strong> (CEO) to fully fund<br />

compliance audits and to identify a new method for<br />

recovering costs for investigative services, and enhancing<br />

service delivery by ensuring that such services can be<br />

provided in a manner consistent with government and<br />

accounting industry standards and best practices for audit<br />

independence;<br />

■ Ongoing implementation of eCAPS (procurement, cost<br />

accounting inventory control modules) and the Advantage<br />

eHR suite of applications to centralize and consolidate the<br />

County’s financial management, reporting, human resources,<br />

and talent management functions;<br />

Changes From 2010-11 <strong>Budget</strong><br />

Gross<br />

Appropriation<br />

($)<br />

AUDITOR-CONTROLLER<br />

<strong>Budget</strong> Summaries<br />

■ Improving the fiscal accountability of social services<br />

■<br />

contractors by resolving issues related to federal recovery of<br />

questioned costs, ensuring auditor access to contractor<br />

records, and continuing to enhance the Contractor’s Manual<br />

to ensure compliance with contract terms and conditions;<br />

Promoting use of direct deposit to pay vendors, thereby<br />

reducing the County’s reliance on check disbursements;<br />

inefficient legacy application that require high levels of staff<br />

and technical support;<br />

■ Supporting fraud prevention, detection and response,<br />

operational efficiency and effectiveness through<br />

■<br />

implementation of technology projects sponsored by the<br />

CEO – Information Technology Fund; and<br />

Promoting efficiency initiatives such as electronic paystubs.<br />

Intrafund<br />

Transfer<br />

($)<br />

Revenue<br />

($)<br />

Net<br />

County Cost<br />

($)<br />

2010-11 Final Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />

Efficiencies<br />

85,058,000 46,492,000 20,193,000 18,373,000 587.0<br />

1. Information Technology Efficiency: Reflects savings<br />

due to the elimination of hardcopy paystubs for five<br />

County departments resulting from the implementation<br />

of the Electronic Paystub Project.<br />

(128,000) (111,000) (17,000) -- --<br />

New/Expanded Programs<br />

1. Contract Monitoring Department of Justice (DOJ):<br />

Reflects the remaining three months of funding<br />

associated with the fiscal year (FY) 2010-11 additions of<br />

5.0 positions and associated services and supplies to<br />

provide contract monitoring services to the Probation<br />

Department to support implementation of the DOJ’s<br />

Memorandum of Agreement and Probation’s Corrective<br />

Action Plan.<br />

2. Shared Services Expansion: Reflects the transfer of<br />

2.0 Procurement Aids, 1.0 Procurement Assistant I, and<br />

1.0 Procurement Assistant III positions, and associated<br />

services and supplies from the Department of Beaches<br />

and Harbors for procurement services.<br />

Curtailments<br />

1. Administrative Services Division: Reflects the<br />

elimination of 1.0 Departmental Personnel Assistant<br />

needed to address the County’s projected structural<br />

funding deficit for FY 2011-12.<br />

2. Services and Supplies: Reflects the elimination of<br />

various services and supplies needed to address the<br />

County’s projected structural funding deficit for<br />

FY 2011-12.<br />

FY 2011-12 <strong>Recommended</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>One</strong> 7.2 County of Los Angeles<br />

Budg<br />

Pos<br />

186,000 186,000 -- -- --<br />

270,000 -- -- 270,000 4.0<br />

(59,000) -- -- (59,000) (1.0)<br />

(505,000) -- -- (505,000) --

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!