SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
when analysing the smallholder viability at farm<br />
and household level. Farm types also provide<br />
relevant synthetic information concerning crop<br />
production systems and production orientations.<br />
Agricultural income of smallholders<br />
In this section, average annual Farm Net<br />
Income (FNI) levels per region and district are<br />
described followed by a detailed examination of<br />
output values and variable costs.<br />
The smallholders in the Sierra Leone survey<br />
are only partially integrated into the cash economy<br />
of the country, and rely heavily on barter for their<br />
economic transactions. Consequently, a market<br />
only approach to evaluate the allocation process<br />
of smallholders’ resources in crop production<br />
might not be the most appropriate. Therefore it is<br />
necessary to address the specific constraints faced<br />
by smallholders in order to better assess farm<br />
household behaviour and strategic decisions.<br />
Accordingly, a more context-specific approach<br />
has been applied to calculate output value and<br />
input costs of the farm production data obtained<br />
from the survey.<br />
It has been already argued (in section 5)<br />
that FNI for the Sierra Leone survey could be<br />
calculated in two different ways: FNI relying<br />
on Neoclassical theory principles of complete<br />
markets (FNI-NA), and FNI based on the<br />
assumption that peasants are only partially<br />
integrated to a market economy and thus face<br />
incomplete markets (FNI-PF). The main differences<br />
between the two FNI calculations are based in<br />
the calculation of consumption and stocks values<br />
and in the way selected input costs are accounted<br />
for. This means that FNI-NA market values are<br />
assigned to inputs used regardless of whether an<br />
actual competitive market exists or not (i.e. seeds,<br />
hired labour and household labour are valued<br />
at market price). In the FNI-PF calculations are<br />
based on real costs which farm households faced<br />
given the underlying productive and input supply<br />
schemes in place at the village level. The results<br />
of these two FNI calculations (illustrated in Figure<br />
45) are here commented and compared.<br />
For the overall analysis of smallholder<br />
performance in terms of farm viability, factor<br />
(labour/land) productivity and food security<br />
achieved through farming, average FNI and<br />
the main economic indicators of smallholder<br />
income measurement have been calculated at the<br />
following levels for all five surveyed districts: FNI<br />
per average farm household, per cultivated acre,<br />
per household working unit and total household<br />
Figure 45. Farm Net Income of Neoclassical and Peasant Farming Approach for an average smallholder<br />
per district (Leones/year)<br />
Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />
105