02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

when analysing the smallholder viability at farm<br />

and household level. Farm types also provide<br />

relevant synthetic information concerning crop<br />

production systems and production orientations.<br />

Agricultural income of smallholders<br />

In this section, average annual Farm Net<br />

Income (FNI) levels per region and district are<br />

described followed by a detailed examination of<br />

output values and variable costs.<br />

The smallholders in the Sierra Leone survey<br />

are only partially integrated into the cash economy<br />

of the country, and rely heavily on barter for their<br />

economic transactions. Consequently, a market<br />

only approach to evaluate the allocation process<br />

of smallholders’ resources in crop production<br />

might not be the most appropriate. Therefore it is<br />

necessary to address the specific constraints faced<br />

by smallholders in order to better assess farm<br />

household behaviour and strategic decisions.<br />

Accordingly, a more context-specific approach<br />

has been applied to calculate output value and<br />

input costs of the farm production data obtained<br />

from the survey.<br />

It has been already argued (in section 5)<br />

that FNI for the Sierra Leone survey could be<br />

calculated in two different ways: FNI relying<br />

on Neoclassical theory principles of complete<br />

markets (FNI-NA), and FNI based on the<br />

assumption that peasants are only partially<br />

integrated to a market economy and thus face<br />

incomplete markets (FNI-PF). The main differences<br />

between the two FNI calculations are based in<br />

the calculation of consumption and stocks values<br />

and in the way selected input costs are accounted<br />

for. This means that FNI-NA market values are<br />

assigned to inputs used regardless of whether an<br />

actual competitive market exists or not (i.e. seeds,<br />

hired labour and household labour are valued<br />

at market price). In the FNI-PF calculations are<br />

based on real costs which farm households faced<br />

given the underlying productive and input supply<br />

schemes in place at the village level. The results<br />

of these two FNI calculations (illustrated in Figure<br />

45) are here commented and compared.<br />

For the overall analysis of smallholder<br />

performance in terms of farm viability, factor<br />

(labour/land) productivity and food security<br />

achieved through farming, average FNI and<br />

the main economic indicators of smallholder<br />

income measurement have been calculated at the<br />

following levels for all five surveyed districts: FNI<br />

per average farm household, per cultivated acre,<br />

per household working unit and total household<br />

Figure 45. Farm Net Income of Neoclassical and Peasant Farming Approach for an average smallholder<br />

per district (Leones/year)<br />

Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!