02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sampling techniques were employed to select<br />

the farming households to interview. Table 18<br />

summarises the distribution of observations per<br />

district, chiefdom and village.<br />

Thus the total sample size of farm<br />

households is 604 out of which 549 benefitted<br />

from some type of support (based on the STABEX<br />

funded initiatives); the remaining 55 comprise<br />

farm households which were not involved in<br />

any aid programme. It is worthwhile to highlight<br />

that since more farm households were targeted<br />

under the STABEX funded project in the Northern<br />

region (9500) than in the Eastern region (3500),<br />

the sample size reflects this proportion.<br />

5.1.2 Data Collection<br />

Data was obtained from two main sources:<br />

primary field survey data from farm households<br />

and exploitation of existing secondary data<br />

from reports of international organisations and<br />

statistics from Sierra Leone Statistics Centre.<br />

In the case of primary data, face to face<br />

interviews were conducted using multiple choice<br />

questionnaires. Two questionnaires (Appendices I<br />

and II) were presented to the heads of the farming<br />

households. The first one collected information on<br />

demographic and social variables and the second<br />

one on production data. These questionnaires<br />

were pre-tested in one of the target communities<br />

in Kenema district. In order to conduct the<br />

survey, six interviewers (enumerators) were<br />

selected among the students of Njala University<br />

and received three days of specific training by the<br />

project coordinators. The preliminary field visit<br />

to test the questionnaires was organised on 20<br />

farms with the duration of two weeks in March<br />

2009, and it was followed by an expert meeting<br />

to validate the questionnaires.<br />

The first questionnaire (A) gathered<br />

data concerning general socio-economic<br />

characteristics of the household and its farming<br />

activities. The number of households visited<br />

per day was on average 5 per enumerator. The<br />

number of households surveyed per village was<br />

on average around 10 in the Eastern districts and<br />

between 20 and 30 in the Northern districts.<br />

Questionnaire A was administered in March<br />

and April 2009. The duration of field visits for<br />

investigators was 3 weeks.<br />

Questionnaire (A) was structured in five<br />

segments, the first three collecting sociodemographic<br />

data, the fourth one explicitly<br />

addressing the impact of STABEX funded<br />

activities in the surveyed districts and the fifth one<br />

capturing farm characteristics. The five segments<br />

are described below.<br />

1. Identification Information: Region, District,<br />

Chiefdom, Section, Village and Household<br />

Number.<br />

2. Household demographic (per occupant):<br />

Gender, Age, Main economic activity<br />

(agriculture, petty trading, paid employment,<br />

artisan, other), sources of income and ranking<br />

of relative importance (farm output, livestock,<br />

remittances, gifts, off-farm activities).<br />

3. Social Capital (of household head): position<br />

in the community (section chief, village,<br />

chief, village headman, tribal authority,<br />

ordinary citizen, “stranger”, other),<br />

membership to any farmer association<br />

(position in the association and number of<br />

memberships), perception of benefit gained<br />

from belonging to any organisation (great,<br />

little, none).<br />

4. STABEX Support: Type of support received<br />

(among the list of cooperation activities<br />

undertaken), Adequacy of support received,<br />

Impact of support in terms of improvement in<br />

production and/or income, sustainability of<br />

support received, Perception of improvement to<br />

the community as a whole (better, same, worse).<br />

5. Farm Characteristics: Types of crops and<br />

cultivated area (between January and<br />

December 2008) and any changes in planted<br />

Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!