SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
sampling techniques were employed to select<br />
the farming households to interview. Table 18<br />
summarises the distribution of observations per<br />
district, chiefdom and village.<br />
Thus the total sample size of farm<br />
households is 604 out of which 549 benefitted<br />
from some type of support (based on the STABEX<br />
funded initiatives); the remaining 55 comprise<br />
farm households which were not involved in<br />
any aid programme. It is worthwhile to highlight<br />
that since more farm households were targeted<br />
under the STABEX funded project in the Northern<br />
region (9500) than in the Eastern region (3500),<br />
the sample size reflects this proportion.<br />
5.1.2 Data Collection<br />
Data was obtained from two main sources:<br />
primary field survey data from farm households<br />
and exploitation of existing secondary data<br />
from reports of international organisations and<br />
statistics from Sierra Leone Statistics Centre.<br />
In the case of primary data, face to face<br />
interviews were conducted using multiple choice<br />
questionnaires. Two questionnaires (Appendices I<br />
and II) were presented to the heads of the farming<br />
households. The first one collected information on<br />
demographic and social variables and the second<br />
one on production data. These questionnaires<br />
were pre-tested in one of the target communities<br />
in Kenema district. In order to conduct the<br />
survey, six interviewers (enumerators) were<br />
selected among the students of Njala University<br />
and received three days of specific training by the<br />
project coordinators. The preliminary field visit<br />
to test the questionnaires was organised on 20<br />
farms with the duration of two weeks in March<br />
2009, and it was followed by an expert meeting<br />
to validate the questionnaires.<br />
The first questionnaire (A) gathered<br />
data concerning general socio-economic<br />
characteristics of the household and its farming<br />
activities. The number of households visited<br />
per day was on average 5 per enumerator. The<br />
number of households surveyed per village was<br />
on average around 10 in the Eastern districts and<br />
between 20 and 30 in the Northern districts.<br />
Questionnaire A was administered in March<br />
and April 2009. The duration of field visits for<br />
investigators was 3 weeks.<br />
Questionnaire (A) was structured in five<br />
segments, the first three collecting sociodemographic<br />
data, the fourth one explicitly<br />
addressing the impact of STABEX funded<br />
activities in the surveyed districts and the fifth one<br />
capturing farm characteristics. The five segments<br />
are described below.<br />
1. Identification Information: Region, District,<br />
Chiefdom, Section, Village and Household<br />
Number.<br />
2. Household demographic (per occupant):<br />
Gender, Age, Main economic activity<br />
(agriculture, petty trading, paid employment,<br />
artisan, other), sources of income and ranking<br />
of relative importance (farm output, livestock,<br />
remittances, gifts, off-farm activities).<br />
3. Social Capital (of household head): position<br />
in the community (section chief, village,<br />
chief, village headman, tribal authority,<br />
ordinary citizen, “stranger”, other),<br />
membership to any farmer association<br />
(position in the association and number of<br />
memberships), perception of benefit gained<br />
from belonging to any organisation (great,<br />
little, none).<br />
4. STABEX Support: Type of support received<br />
(among the list of cooperation activities<br />
undertaken), Adequacy of support received,<br />
Impact of support in terms of improvement in<br />
production and/or income, sustainability of<br />
support received, Perception of improvement to<br />
the community as a whole (better, same, worse).<br />
5. Farm Characteristics: Types of crops and<br />
cultivated area (between January and<br />
December 2008) and any changes in planted<br />
Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />
75