02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Survey Results<br />

120<br />

Figure 62. Farm viability of smallholders in Eastern region based on Neoclassical Approach<br />

In the Eastern districts and under PF income<br />

approach, 97% of the smallholders are above<br />

and 3% fall below the reproduction threshold (RT<br />

East = 700000 Leones) 43 . With the NA income<br />

approach 93% are above and 7% fall below. In<br />

the Eastern region the difference between the two<br />

approaches is smaller since these smallholders<br />

are more integrated into the market economy.<br />

Overall, these results imply that while in the<br />

Northern region most of the farms could not be<br />

viable if they would be taken out of their social/<br />

cultural/village environment with current farming<br />

practices and productivity level, on the Eastern<br />

region most of the farms are deemed viable as<br />

a separate or self-standing unit of production<br />

and less dependent on social aspects. Although,<br />

it must be stressed that cash tree crop farms are<br />

heavily dependent on village networks in order<br />

to secure additional labour during collection<br />

periods. With the intention of further analysing of<br />

farm viability, the analysis focuses on farm types.<br />

The farm household were grouped into<br />

different farm types based on their crop mix and<br />

degree of market or self-consumption/(semi)<br />

43 The reproduction threshold for the Eastern region (RT east)<br />

was set to be equal to 700000 Leones of Farm Net Income<br />

per household working unit (see Chapter 5)<br />

subsistence orientation. Figure 63 and Figure 64<br />

present results under the NA and the PF approaches<br />

of the viability analysis per farm type. Under the NA<br />

income approach, most of the (semi)subsistence<br />

oriented farm types (F1-F5), located in the Northern<br />

region appear as non-viable, and only the market<br />

oriented ones of the Easter region (F6-F8) are above<br />

the reproduction threshold. Under the PF income<br />

approach it is demonstrated that farm types F1-F5<br />

may also be viable when their specific context and<br />

environment conditions are explicitly accounted<br />

for. In other words, under the PF income approach<br />

issues related to the village organisational schemes<br />

and institutional arrangements are considered. The<br />

latter, is therefore seen as a more realistic framework<br />

in which to evaluate farm viability in Sierra Leone.<br />

Figure 65 and Figure 66 illustrate the economic<br />

viability per farm type in the Northern and Eastern<br />

regions separately, based on PF income approach.<br />

In the Northern districts, there is a tendency<br />

to crop diversification as the land availability<br />

per household member increases. The smallest<br />

farms are mainly growing only rice and maybe<br />

other food crops for a very low income (FT1,<br />

FT2), however slightly bigger farms tend to have<br />

oil palm and other tree crops as well (FT3, FT4),<br />

which helps them to produce higher output<br />

value per household unit. Although output

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!