SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 Survey Results<br />
106<br />
Figure 46. Annual Cash flow of output value and input production costs (Leones/year)<br />
unit. Results aggregated per district are presented<br />
in Table 27 up to Table 30, respectively.<br />
As illustrated in Figure 45 more income is<br />
generated from household production in Eastern<br />
region than in the Northern region, however the<br />
magnitude of it does also vary across the different<br />
districts and the method of FNI calculation. It can<br />
be seen that based on FNI-NA calculations the<br />
overall performance of the farms in the Eastern<br />
regions is positive (with Kono being around zero),<br />
thus profitable, compared to the farms in the<br />
Northern regions, where farm net income and<br />
farm gross margin both show a negative value.<br />
Alternative calculation of FNI-PF shows positive<br />
results for FNI for all the districts, with best<br />
performing values in Kailahun district. The choice<br />
of crop appears as a determinant factor given<br />
the higher output value of cash crops (i.e. cocoa<br />
and coffee) mainly produced in the Easter region.<br />
From this viewpoint, it may be argued that higher<br />
benefits are obtained per acre in the East than the<br />
North. Nevertheless, costs in Eastern district of<br />
Kailahun were observed to fairly similar to costs<br />
in both districts of the Northern region on a per<br />
acre basis. The key difference lies in the output<br />
value which in both districts of the Northern<br />
region is roughly one-fourth the output value in<br />
Kailahun. Consequently, the balance is positive<br />
in Kailahun district and negative in the Northern<br />
region. Concerning Kenema and Kono, production<br />
is significantly lower (less than half) than in<br />
Kailahun, but so are costs, so the difference stays<br />
positive. Although, if only food crop output value<br />
is compared, the Northern districts on average<br />
appear in a similar position to the Eastern districts.<br />
For cash flow calculation (Figure 46) all<br />
expenditures that are not calculated in cash terms<br />
were excluded, and thus only those components<br />
remain where cash was actually either spent were<br />
included: seeds41 , livestock purchase, hired labour<br />
for cash crops (i.e. during collection periods), or<br />
earnings associated to sold production. As a result,<br />
the balance is slightly negative in the North and it<br />
may only be compensated through complementary<br />
coping strategies such as loans, family gifts, noncash<br />
economic transactions at the village level and<br />
aid between families or other institutional bodies<br />
(NGO’s, Government or International assistance).<br />
However, considering the very low monetary<br />
value of the negative cash-balance the socioeconomic<br />
impact is in fact quite marginal (10000<br />
Leones are roughly 1,78 EUR) and the households<br />
in Northern districts can be considered balanced<br />
around zero in real terms.<br />
41 In the case of seeds, the 2003/2004 Sierra Leone survey<br />
indicates that usually 1/4th of seeds are acquired without<br />
enterint into a monetary exchange.