02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 69. Poverty level per farm type based on Peasant Farming Approach (only agricultural income is<br />

accounted for)<br />

NB: FT1 = rice only; FT2 = rice & other food; FT3 = rice & other food & tree for subsistence; FT4 = rice & tree for subsistence; FT5<br />

= other tree for subsistence farms; FT6 = rice & tree for cash; FT7 = rice & other food & tree for cash and FT8 = only cash tree farms.<br />

of cash crops in the lowlands of the Northern<br />

districts of the country. In fact, not even in swamp<br />

valleys of the Southern districts of the country not<br />

covered in the sample. What could be a more<br />

feasible option is for smallholders in the Northern<br />

region to improve yields and decrease pre- and<br />

post-harvest losses at the acre level.<br />

Another interesting issue arising from the<br />

results is that in the case of farm types devoted<br />

to subsistence cultivation (i.e. mainly located in<br />

the Northern districts), those with higher crop<br />

diversification appear to be in a slightly better<br />

position. The same may be argued in the Eastern<br />

districts. Those farms engaged only in cash crop<br />

production are slightly worse off than those<br />

with mixed crop orientation which involves<br />

not only highly valued cash crops but also<br />

upland and lowland rice and oil. In the case<br />

of the Eastern region, diversification strategies<br />

may be considered to reduce uncertainties due<br />

to weather failures, changes in market access<br />

or specific crop failures (due to unexpected<br />

disease). This implies that a mono-cash tree crop<br />

cultivation path is not precisely adequate to<br />

address poverty issues.<br />

6.3 Input factor productivity of<br />

smallholders<br />

The input factor productivity is assessed<br />

by analysing the two main important inputs of<br />

smallholders: land (6.3.1) and labour (6.3.2).<br />

Besides of the measurement of the productivity as<br />

a ratio of output per input use (which provides<br />

an apparent productivity measurement), a rough<br />

proxy of technical efficiency is introduced (in<br />

order to focus on output obtained per working<br />

unit given the underlying land used).<br />

6.3.1 Land productivity<br />

Land productivity is measured as a ration of<br />

the output per cultivated land area in monetary<br />

terms (Output Value per cultivated acre). Since<br />

in section 6.2.2 all economic indicator per<br />

cultivated acre were illustrated, in this subsection<br />

only the results of Output Value per<br />

cultivated acre are discussed in more detail.<br />

The total farm productivity per cultivated acre<br />

can be seen in Figure 70. Figure 71 presents output<br />

value separately for tree and food production.<br />

Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!