02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 80. Labour productivity per working unit for Upland rice in the Northern and Eastern regions<br />

working unit in both regions. Distance between<br />

farm households may be attributed to differences<br />

in labour use or effort, interaction with other<br />

inputs (i.e. tools, fertilizers) and the adequate use<br />

of such additional inputs. However, since within<br />

each region different constraints may arise, it is<br />

best to compare farms producing upland rice<br />

at district level. Accordingly, the regional level<br />

comparison shows (Figure 80) that farms in the<br />

Eastern region perform slightly better in terms of<br />

labour productivity per working unit in the case<br />

of upland rice production (productivity at district<br />

level is illustrated in Appendix IV).<br />

From a general perspective, it can be seen<br />

that the most productive farms produce around<br />

10 bushels/acre with one working unit cultivating<br />

up to 6 acres; after that the productivity per<br />

additional acre is diminishing considerably.<br />

This means that labour productivity can reach<br />

60 bushels/year per working unit, which is<br />

equivalent to 1500kg of rice (at least 3 acres/<br />

person (30 bushels/year) would be needed under<br />

the current technology to fulfil the basic dietary<br />

requirement – based on rice only). 45 However,<br />

45 The minimum yearly caloric requirement of rice<br />

equivalent is 760kg rice per year or 985 kcal/year based<br />

on the minimum daily caloric requirement of 2700<br />

calories; 1 kg rice = 1300 calories (PRSP, 2005)). At this<br />

level of output per working unit it is sufficient to cover the<br />

basic caloric needs; however only very few farms reach<br />

this degree of efficiency in their combination of labour<br />

and land use<br />

most of the farms are less productive and dispose<br />

on average of 1-2 acres per household member,<br />

which means they would need to use their<br />

land more efficiently to rich higher yields, or<br />

sell their crop and buy more nutritious food or<br />

need to have to find other sources of income to<br />

survive. Currently on average around one acre/<br />

person is available, except Kono and Kenema<br />

with more than 2 acres (Figure 30), which implies<br />

that production technology requires substantial<br />

increase in improvement so that yields are<br />

increase sufficiently to sustain the present<br />

household population.<br />

In the case of IVS rice, 50 bushels/year per<br />

person may be obtained with a working unit<br />

cultivating up to 3 acres per year (Figure 81). This<br />

translates into approximately 15 bushels per acre,<br />

which is 1.5 times higher than the production of<br />

upland rice. However, most of the farms here also<br />

fall below the observed best practice of some<br />

smallholders in the sample. In fact, the average is<br />

closer to 10 bushels/acre per year.<br />

The Figure 82 on Boli rice production (which<br />

tales place only in the Bombali district located in<br />

the Northern region) shows increasing productivity<br />

of up to 5 acre per person and 10 bushels per<br />

acre, which leads to 50 bushels per person a<br />

year. However in some cases 60-70 bushels can<br />

be reached by one working unit. This shows<br />

that in Bombali district higher productivity can<br />

Rural poverty reduction and food security: The case of smallholders in Sierra Leone<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!