SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 The Agricultural Sector<br />
58<br />
severely deprived in Sub-Saharan Africa in terms<br />
of institutional facilities (FAO, 2005). The majority<br />
of the farmers in Sierra Leone operate as basic<br />
subsistence food production units, who, for the<br />
most part, do not use improved techniques and<br />
inputs. Crop production is thus characterised by<br />
low yields and productivity insufficient to supply<br />
the food requirements of their farm households.<br />
The slow growth of the sector (all crops included)<br />
may therefore be attributed to the interplay of<br />
several factors influencing farmers’ behaviour29 and farm productivity.<br />
3.5.1 Poverty & Food Insecurity<br />
Rural areas in Sierra Leone have the highest<br />
levels of poverty in the country, and this is closely<br />
Table 11. Average annual consumption per household by district (in Leones)<br />
linked to the situation in the agriculture sector.<br />
In the 2004 Sierra Leone Integrated Household<br />
Survey, 37% of the survey participants blamed<br />
their poverty on “poor access to assets and<br />
services, climatic and market conditions in<br />
the agriculture sector,” as opposed to 32% on<br />
“business conditions,” and 27% as a “direct result<br />
of the war.” Although agriculture -related factors<br />
are not at the top of the most frequently mentioned<br />
characteristics and causes of poverty, infertile<br />
land, poor harvests and lack of agricultural tools<br />
are all regularly mentioned; “while having cash<br />
crop plantations” are mentioned as an important<br />
element of well-being. (Sesay et al, 2004)<br />
In some districts, such as Tonkolili,<br />
Koinadugu and Pujehun, about 50% of household<br />
District Food Purchases Own production Total<br />
% Consumption<br />
from own production<br />
Bo 995,232 715,118 1710,350 41,81%<br />
Bonthe 910,517 379,453 1289,970 29,42%<br />
Moyamba 1183,441 693,217 1876,658 36,94%<br />
Pujehun 956,562 988,413 1944,975 50,82%<br />
Kailahun 713,654 554,446 1268,100 43,72%<br />
Kenema 829,861 307,047 1136,908 27,01%<br />
Kono 1133,343 825,458 1958,801 42,14%<br />
Bombali 744,451 496,880 1241,331 40,03%<br />
Kambia 1529,847 668,281 2198,128 30,40%<br />
Koinadugu 909,429 962,337 1871,766 51,41%<br />
Porto Loko 1282,879 566,595 1849,474 30,64%<br />
Tonkolili 799,715 885,010 1684,725 52,53%<br />
Western Urban 2773,500 2,985 2776,485 0,11%<br />
Western Rural 2132,890 138,215 2271,105 6,09%<br />
Total 1208,987 576,900 1785,887 32,30%<br />
Source: Sierra Leone Integrated Household Survey 2004 from Sesay et al. (2004).<br />
29 According to Sesay et al (2004) the fact that in most<br />
instances agricultural policies have been formulated<br />
without the participation of the farmers themselves has<br />
implied that farmers remain unclear about the intentions<br />
or usefulness of such agricultural policies. As a result,<br />
even if such policies may be good for the farmers, they<br />
may not have the desired effect, since there is lack of trust<br />
and feeling of ownership by the anticipated beneficiaries.