02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 Conclusions<br />

162<br />

In the Eastern districts, Deutsche Welthungerhilfe<br />

engaged in similar tasks directed to cocoa and<br />

coffee producers but with a higher emphasis on<br />

the development of marketing structures, output<br />

quality controls, rehabilitation of plantations<br />

and promoting access to credit to cooperatives.<br />

Contrary to many post war agricultural measures<br />

that have been conceived in a top-down<br />

framework, with limited/no involvement of<br />

farmers and their representatives, most of these<br />

activities were conceived and conducted using<br />

a participatory approach. Under this approach,<br />

awareness, ownership and trust on aid policies<br />

are more likely to emerge, thus positively affecting<br />

the achievement of overall project objectives.<br />

The qualitative data available in the survey<br />

allows for assessing the relevance, effectiveness,<br />

impact and sustainability of the aid programmes<br />

to which smallholders had access. In addition,<br />

the survey provided information on the perceived<br />

General Improvement in the Community Area.<br />

In terms of relevance (or perceived adequacy) of<br />

the support received to the farmer-householder’s<br />

needs, smallholders considered it was very low<br />

in general (and only Action Aid received slightly<br />

higher positive feedback). The evaluation of<br />

effectiveness entailed measuring how far the<br />

specific objectives of the projects implemented<br />

have been met from the point of view of farm<br />

household beneficiaries. However, when<br />

evaluating the level of improvement in production<br />

and income resulting from their interaction with<br />

the implementing agencies, most respondents<br />

reported some improvement, and especially a<br />

great improvement was perceived by 20% of the<br />

smallholders in the Northern region. Regarding<br />

the measures with the highest impact on food<br />

security and livelihood at the household level<br />

there were discrepancies between smallholders<br />

from the Northern and Eastern regions. In the<br />

Eastern region, the improvement of market access<br />

was deemed the most important to achieve food<br />

security. In the Northern region higher impact to<br />

improving food security is associated to staple<br />

food prices, cultivated area and food production.<br />

Unlike the Eastern districts, access to markets<br />

is in the Northern districts deemed to have less<br />

of an impact; which makes sense given that in<br />

the Northern region there is limited presence of<br />

cash crops. Sustainability can only be evaluated<br />

several years after implementation of the<br />

projects. Consequently, smallholders were asked<br />

about expected future sustainability of project<br />

components. Around 80% of respondents in the<br />

Eastern region and 50% of respondents in the<br />

Northern region perceived that the initiatives that<br />

were provided to them will serve to their long<br />

term benefit. Concerning the answers to General<br />

Improvement in the Community Area with respect<br />

to different development areas, the respondents<br />

perceived some enhancement in food security<br />

and the opportunities to sell farm produce (which<br />

were specifically targeted by STABEX). However,<br />

areas such as education, health care, provision<br />

of agricultural services and opportunities to buy<br />

fertilizers appear to have worsened from the point<br />

of view of targeted smallholders.<br />

Overall, one issue worthwhile exploring is<br />

related to aid programmes undertaken at village<br />

level since smallholders appear to work in a<br />

collaborative manner and many resources are<br />

shared. In this manner it would be necessary to<br />

identify the type of common assets and strategies<br />

which could benefit the majority of smallholders<br />

within their communities; for example: feeder<br />

roads, market information, cooperatives (e.g.<br />

Agro-Business Centres) to gain access to key<br />

inputs, including credit. Accordingly, aid should<br />

come in a format which not only supports yield<br />

increase but also guarantees food security in a<br />

more comprehensive manner and connects farm<br />

households to market opportunities. For this<br />

it is necessary to take into account the socioeconomic<br />

and cultural context of farm households<br />

while considering potential constraints specific<br />

to crop orientation. In the Eastern districts both<br />

cash tree crops and food crops play an important<br />

role in achieving food security objectives; while<br />

in the North, where the cultivation of cocoa and<br />

coffee is not advisable due to agro-ecological<br />

constraints (lower rainfall gradient inducing lower<br />

and highly variable yields), farm households

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!