02.08.2013 Views

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 Survey Methodology<br />

74<br />

1) Upland land forest tree cropping system<br />

(mainly coffee and cocoa)<br />

2) Upland land food cropping system (mainly<br />

rice)<br />

3) Lowland (Inland Valley Swamp and Boliland)<br />

food cropping system (mainly rice)<br />

While a certain degree of overlapping in terms<br />

of cropping orientation is present in the five districts<br />

(given the nature of the agrarian system in Sierra<br />

Leone), there is a strong differentiation between the<br />

Northern and Eastern regions. Rice production is the<br />

most prominent feature of household production in<br />

the North. Cocoa and coffee are dominant crops<br />

in the Eastern districts (Action Aid, 2008, 2009;<br />

Welthungerhilfe, 2007, 2009).<br />

Lastly, besides the socio-economic and farmlevel<br />

production aspects the survey addresses also<br />

questions on how relevant the different STABEX<br />

Table 18. Distribution of sample observation<br />

REGION DISTRICT CHIEFDOM<br />

Northern region<br />

Eastern region<br />

Bombali<br />

Tonkolili<br />

Magbaeiamba<br />

Ndohahun<br />

Number of<br />

VILLAGES<br />

funded development and poverty reduction initiatives<br />

were to farm households (in qualitative terms).<br />

5.1.1 Sample Size and Selection<br />

Three related criteria were taken into<br />

consideration in defining the sample size. First,<br />

the sample needed to be sufficiently inclusive,<br />

so that not only the five districts involved were<br />

equally represented (based on the number of<br />

supported farms) but that the most common<br />

types of farm households engaged in the different<br />

cropping systems could be integrated. This is<br />

particularly relevant, as in Sierra Leone, intercropping<br />

practices are widespread. Second, the<br />

sample had to be large enough to lend itself to<br />

statistical inferences. Third, a control group of<br />

farm households not benefitting from any type of<br />

support was introduced and randomly selected<br />

across all five districts in the proportion of the<br />

total sample size in the Northern and Eastern<br />

regions. Both purposive and stratified random<br />

Total number of<br />

RESPONDENTS<br />

Number of respondents<br />

in CONTROL GROUP<br />

4 79 1<br />

Bombali Sebora 4 118 14<br />

Kholifa Rowalla 8 98 2<br />

Tane 3 106 20<br />

Kono Gorama Kono 4 65 10<br />

Kenema<br />

Kailahun<br />

Nongowa 6 47 5<br />

Lower Bambara 2 19 0<br />

Peje West 3 27 1<br />

Yawei 3 28 0<br />

Upper Bambara 1 11 1<br />

Mandu 1 6 1<br />

Total 5 11 39 604 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!