SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
SIERRA LEONE maq 4ª.indd - agrilife - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5 Survey Methodology<br />
74<br />
1) Upland land forest tree cropping system<br />
(mainly coffee and cocoa)<br />
2) Upland land food cropping system (mainly<br />
rice)<br />
3) Lowland (Inland Valley Swamp and Boliland)<br />
food cropping system (mainly rice)<br />
While a certain degree of overlapping in terms<br />
of cropping orientation is present in the five districts<br />
(given the nature of the agrarian system in Sierra<br />
Leone), there is a strong differentiation between the<br />
Northern and Eastern regions. Rice production is the<br />
most prominent feature of household production in<br />
the North. Cocoa and coffee are dominant crops<br />
in the Eastern districts (Action Aid, 2008, 2009;<br />
Welthungerhilfe, 2007, 2009).<br />
Lastly, besides the socio-economic and farmlevel<br />
production aspects the survey addresses also<br />
questions on how relevant the different STABEX<br />
Table 18. Distribution of sample observation<br />
REGION DISTRICT CHIEFDOM<br />
Northern region<br />
Eastern region<br />
Bombali<br />
Tonkolili<br />
Magbaeiamba<br />
Ndohahun<br />
Number of<br />
VILLAGES<br />
funded development and poverty reduction initiatives<br />
were to farm households (in qualitative terms).<br />
5.1.1 Sample Size and Selection<br />
Three related criteria were taken into<br />
consideration in defining the sample size. First,<br />
the sample needed to be sufficiently inclusive,<br />
so that not only the five districts involved were<br />
equally represented (based on the number of<br />
supported farms) but that the most common<br />
types of farm households engaged in the different<br />
cropping systems could be integrated. This is<br />
particularly relevant, as in Sierra Leone, intercropping<br />
practices are widespread. Second, the<br />
sample had to be large enough to lend itself to<br />
statistical inferences. Third, a control group of<br />
farm households not benefitting from any type of<br />
support was introduced and randomly selected<br />
across all five districts in the proportion of the<br />
total sample size in the Northern and Eastern<br />
regions. Both purposive and stratified random<br />
Total number of<br />
RESPONDENTS<br />
Number of respondents<br />
in CONTROL GROUP<br />
4 79 1<br />
Bombali Sebora 4 118 14<br />
Kholifa Rowalla 8 98 2<br />
Tane 3 106 20<br />
Kono Gorama Kono 4 65 10<br />
Kenema<br />
Kailahun<br />
Nongowa 6 47 5<br />
Lower Bambara 2 19 0<br />
Peje West 3 27 1<br />
Yawei 3 28 0<br />
Upper Bambara 1 11 1<br />
Mandu 1 6 1<br />
Total 5 11 39 604 55