17.08.2013 Views

THÈSE Estimation, validation et identification des modèles ARMA ...

THÈSE Estimation, validation et identification des modèles ARMA ...

THÈSE Estimation, validation et identification des modèles ARMA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapitre 4. Multivariate portmanteau test for weak structural V<strong>ARMA</strong> models 131<br />

It is seen in Theorem 4.3, that the asymptotic distribution of the BP and LB<br />

portmanteau tests depends of the nuisance param<strong>et</strong>ers involving Σe, the matrix Φm and<br />

the elements of the matrix Ξ. We need an consistent estimator of the above unknown<br />

matrices. The matrixΣe can be consistently estimate by its sample estimate ˆ Σe = ˆ Γe(0).<br />

The matrix Φm can be easily estimated by its empirical counterpart<br />

ˆΦm = 1<br />

n<br />

n<br />

<br />

ê ′<br />

t−1,...,ê ′ ′ ∂<strong>et</strong>(θ0)<br />

t−m ⊗<br />

∂θ ′<br />

<br />

t=1<br />

θ0= ˆ θn<br />

In the econom<strong>et</strong>ric literature the nonparam<strong>et</strong>ric kernel estimator, also called h<strong>et</strong>eroskedastic<br />

autocorrelation consistent (HAC) estimator (see Newey and West, 1987, or<br />

Andrews, 1991), is widely used to estimate covariance matrices of the form Ξ. An alternative<br />

m<strong>et</strong>hod consists in using a param<strong>et</strong>ric AR estimate of the spectral density ofΥt =<br />

(Υ ′ 1 t,Υ ′ 2 t) ′ , whereΥ1 t = e ′ t−1,...,e ′ ′⊗<strong>et</strong><br />

t−m andΥ2 t = −2J−1 (∂e ′ t(θ0)/∂θ)Σ −1<br />

e0 <strong>et</strong>(θ0).<br />

Interpr<strong>et</strong>ing (2π) −1Ξ as the spectral density of the stationary process (Υt) evaluated<br />

at frequency 0 (see Brockwell and Davis, 1991, p. 459). This approach, which has been<br />

studied by Berk (1974) (see also den Hann and Levin, 1997). So we have<br />

Ξ = Φ −1 (1)ΣuΦ −1 (1)<br />

when (Υt) satisfies an AR(∞) representation of the form<br />

Φ(L)Υt := Υt +<br />

∞<br />

ΦiΥt−i = ut, (4.12)<br />

where ut is a weak white noise with variance matrix Σu. Since Υt is not observable, l<strong>et</strong><br />

ˆΥt be the vector obtained by replacing θ0 by ˆ θn inΥt. L<strong>et</strong> ˆ Φr(z) = I k0+d 2 m+ r<br />

i=1 ˆ Φr,iz i ,<br />

where ˆ Φr,1,..., ˆ Φr,r denote the coefficients of the LS regression of ˆ Υt on ˆ Υt−1,..., ˆ Υt−r.<br />

L<strong>et</strong> ûr,t be the residuals of this regression, and l<strong>et</strong> ˆ Σûr be the empirical variance of<br />

ûr,1,...,ûr,n.<br />

We are now able to state the following theorem, which is an extension of a result<br />

given in Francq, Roy and Zakoïan (2005).<br />

Theorem 4.4. In addition to the assumptions of Theorem 4.1, assume that the process<br />

(Υt) admits an AR(∞) representation (4.12) in which the roots of d<strong>et</strong>Φ(z) = 0<br />

are outside the unit disk, Φi = o(i−2 ), and Σu = Var(ut) is non-singular. Moreover<br />

we assume that ǫt8+4ν < ∞ and ∞ k=0 {αX,ǫ(k)} ν/(2+ν) < ∞ for some ν > 0,<br />

where {αX,ǫ(k)} k≥0 denotes the sequence of the strong mixing coefficients of the process<br />

(X ′ t ,ǫ′ t )′ . Then the spectral estimator of Ξ<br />

i=1<br />

ˆΞ SP := ˆ Φ −1<br />

r (1)ˆ Σûr ˆ Φ ′−1<br />

r (1) → Ξ<br />

in probability when r = r(n) → ∞ and r 3 /n → 0 as n → ∞.<br />

L<strong>et</strong> ˆ Ωm be the matrix obtained by replacing Ξ by ˆ Ξ and Σe by ˆ Σe in Ωm. Denote<br />

by ˆ ξm = ( ˆ ξ 1,d 2 m,..., ˆ ξ d 2 m,d 2 m) ′ the vector of the eigenvalues of ˆ Ωm. At the asymptotic<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!