13.11.2013 Views

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 BREAST<br />

BREASTPLATE<br />

Breast . In one <strong>of</strong> the Old Lectures, quoted<br />

by Dr. Oliver, it is said : "A Mason's breast<br />

should be a safe and sacred repository for all<br />

your just and lawful secrets. A brother's<br />

secrets, delivered to me as such, I would keep<br />

as my own ; as to betray that trust might be<br />

doing him the greatest injury he could sustain<br />

in this mortal life ; nay, it would be like the<br />

villany <strong>of</strong> an assassin who lurks in darkness to<br />

stab his adversary when unarmed and least<br />

prepared to meet an enemy ."<br />

It is true, that the secrets <strong>of</strong> a Mason, confided<br />

as such, should be as inviolate in the<br />

breast <strong>of</strong> him who has received them as the<br />

were in his own before they were confid<br />

But it would be wrong to conclude that in this<br />

a Mason is placed in a position different from<br />

that which is occupied by every honorable<br />

man . No man <strong>of</strong> honor is permitted to reveal<br />

a secret which he has received under the<br />

pledge <strong>of</strong> secrecy . But it is as false as it is<br />

absurd, to assert that either the man <strong>of</strong> honor<br />

or the Mason is bound by any such obligation<br />

to protect the criminal from the vindication<br />

<strong>of</strong> the law. It must be left to every man to<br />

determine by his own conscience whether he<br />

is at liberty to betray a knowledge <strong>of</strong> facts<br />

with which he could not have become acquainted<br />

except under Some such pledge . No<br />

court <strong>of</strong> law would attempt to extort a communication<br />

<strong>of</strong> facts made known by a penitent<br />

to his confessor or a client to his lawyer ;<br />

for such a communication would make the<br />

person communicating it infamous . In this<br />

case, Masonry supphes no other rule than<br />

that which is found m the acknowledged codes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Moral Ethics.<br />

Breastplate. Called in Hebrew j=, chosen,<br />

or T1£'27n IV)n, chosen mishpet, the breastplate<br />

<strong>of</strong> judgment, because through it the high<br />

priest received divine responses and uttered<br />

his decisions on all matters relating to the<br />

good <strong>of</strong> the commonwealth. It was a piece<br />

<strong>of</strong> embroidered cloth <strong>of</strong> gold, purple, scarlet,<br />

and fine white, twined linen . It was a span,<br />

or about nine inches square, when doubled,<br />

and made thus strong to hold the precious<br />

stones that were set in it . It had a gold ring<br />

at each corner, to the uppermost <strong>of</strong> which<br />

were attached golden chains, by which it was<br />

fastened to the shoulder-pieces <strong>of</strong> the ephod ;<br />

while from the two lowermost went two ribbons<br />

<strong>of</strong> blue, by which it was attached to the<br />

girdle <strong>of</strong> the ephod, and thus held secure in its<br />

place . In the breastplate were set twelve precious<br />

jewels, on each <strong>of</strong> which was engraved<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the twelve tribes . <strong>The</strong><br />

stones were arranged in four rows, three stones<br />

in each row . As to the order <strong>of</strong> arrangement<br />

and the names <strong>of</strong> the stones, there has been<br />

some difference among the authorities. <strong>The</strong><br />

authorized version <strong>of</strong> the Bible gives them in<br />

this order : Sardius, topaz, carbuncle, emerald,<br />

sapphire, diamond, ligure, agate, amethyst,<br />

b 1, onyx, jasper . This is the pattern genera<br />

y followed in the construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>Masonic</strong><br />

breastplates, but modern researches into the<br />

true meaning <strong>of</strong> the Hebrew names <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stones have shown its inaccuracy. Espe-<br />

cially must the diamond be rejected, as no<br />

engraver could have cut a name on this impenetrable<br />

gem, to say nothing <strong>of</strong> the pecuniary<br />

value <strong>of</strong> a diamond <strong>of</strong> a size to match the<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the stones. Josephus (Ant ., III ., vii.)<br />

gives the stones in the following order : Sardonyx,<br />

topaz, emerald ; carbuncle, jasper,<br />

sapphire ; ligure, amethyst, agate ; chrysolite,<br />

onyx, beryl. Kalisch, in his Commentary on<br />

Exodus, gives a still different order : Cornelian<br />

(or sardius), topaz, smaragdus ; carbuncle,<br />

sapphire, emerald ; ligure, agate, amethyst<br />

; chrysolite, onyx, jasper. But perhaps<br />

the Vulgate translation is to be preferred as<br />

an authority, because it was made in the fifth<br />

century, at a time when the old Hebrew names<br />

<strong>of</strong> the precious stones were better understood<br />

than now. <strong>The</strong> order given in that version is<br />

shown in the following diagram :<br />

EMERALD. TOPAZ . SARDIIIS .<br />

JASPER . SAPPHIRE . CARBUNCLE .<br />

AMETHYST. AGATE. LIGIIRE.<br />

BERYL. ONYx . CHRYSOLITE .<br />

A description <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these stones, with<br />

its symbolic signification, will be found under<br />

the appropriate head .<br />

On the Stones were engraved the names <strong>of</strong><br />

the twelve tribes, one on each stone . <strong>The</strong><br />

order in which they were placed, according to<br />

the Jewish Targums, was as follows, havin g a<br />

reference to the respective ages <strong>of</strong> the twelve<br />

sons <strong>of</strong> Jacob :<br />

LEVI . SIMEON. REIIBEN.<br />

ZEBIILIIN . ISSACHAR. JUDAH .<br />

GAD . NAPHTALI . DAN.<br />

BENJAMIN. JOSEPH. ASHER .<br />

<strong>The</strong> differences made by different writers in<br />

the order <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> the stones arise only<br />

from their respective translations <strong>of</strong> the Hebrew<br />

words . <strong>The</strong>se original names are detailed<br />

in Exodus (xxviii .), and admit <strong>of</strong> no<br />

doubt, whatever doubt there may be as to the<br />

gems which they were intended to represent .<br />

<strong>The</strong>se Hebrew names axe given on opposite<br />

page .<br />

<strong>The</strong> breastplate which was used in the first<br />

Temple does not appear to have been returned<br />

after the Captivity, for it is not mentioned in<br />

the list <strong>of</strong> articles sent back by Cyrus. <strong>The</strong><br />

stones, on account <strong>of</strong> their great beauty and<br />

value, were most probably removed from their

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!