13.11.2013 Views

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FREE<br />

FREEDOM 281<br />

only temporarily in a place <strong>of</strong> confinement . In<br />

the year 1783, the Master <strong>of</strong> the Royal Military<br />

Lodge at Woolwich (No . 371) being confined,<br />

most probably for debt, in the King's<br />

Bench prison, at London, the Lodge, which<br />

was itinerant in its character and allowed to<br />

move from place to place with its regiment,<br />

adjourned, with its warrant <strong>of</strong> Constitution,<br />

to the Master in prison, where several Masons<br />

were made . <strong>The</strong> <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge, being informed<br />

<strong>of</strong> the circumstances, immediately<br />

summoned the Master and Wardens <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Lodge "to answer for their conduct in making<br />

Masons in the King's Bench prison," and, at<br />

the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming<br />

that "it is inconsistent with the _principles <strong>of</strong><br />

Masonry for any Freemasons' odge to be<br />

held, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> making, passing, or<br />

raising Masons, in any prison or place <strong>of</strong> confinement."<br />

(Constitutions, 1784, p . 349 .)<br />

Free and Accepted . <strong>The</strong> title" Free and<br />

Accepted" first occurs in the Roberts Print <strong>of</strong><br />

1722, which is headed <strong>The</strong> Old Constitutions<br />

belonging to the Ancient and Honourable Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> Free and Accepted Masons, and was adopted<br />

by Dr. Anderson in the second edition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Book <strong>of</strong> Constitutions, published in 1738, the<br />

title <strong>of</strong> which is <strong>The</strong> New Book <strong>of</strong> Constitutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Antient and Honourable Fraternity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Free and Accepted Masons . In the first<br />

edition <strong>of</strong> 1723 the title was, <strong>The</strong> Constitutions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Freemasons. <strong>The</strong> newer title continued<br />

to be used by the <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England,<br />

in which it was followed by those <strong>of</strong> Scotland<br />

and Ireland ; and a majority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Grand</strong><br />

Lodges in this country have adopted the same<br />

style, and call themselves <strong>Grand</strong> Lodges <strong>of</strong><br />

Free and Accepted Masons . (See Accepted .)<br />

<strong>The</strong> old lectures formerly used in England<br />

give the following account <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

term :<br />

"<strong>The</strong> Masons who were selected to build<br />

the Temple <strong>of</strong> Solomon were declared FREE<br />

and were exempted, together with their descendants,<br />

from imposts, duties, and taxes .<br />

<strong>The</strong>y had also the privilege to bear arms . At<br />

the destruction <strong>of</strong> the Temple by Nebuchadnezzar,<br />

the posterity <strong>of</strong> these Masons were<br />

carried into captivity with the ancient Jews .<br />

But the good-will <strong>of</strong> Cyrus gave them permission<br />

to erect a second Temple, having set<br />

them at liberty for that purpose. It is from<br />

this epoch that we bear the name <strong>of</strong> Free and<br />

Accepted Masons ."<br />

Free Born. In all the old Constitutions,<br />

free birth is required as a requisite to the reception<br />

<strong>of</strong> Apprentices . Thus the Lansdowne<br />

MS . says, "That the prentice be able <strong>of</strong> birth,<br />

that is, freeborn ." So it is in the Edinburgh<br />

Kilwinning, the York, the Antiquity, and in<br />

every other manuscript that has been so far<br />

discovered . And hence, the modern Constitutions<br />

framed in 1721 continue the regulation<br />

. After the abolition <strong>of</strong> slavery in the<br />

West Indies by the British Parliament, the<br />

<strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England on September 1,<br />

1847, changed the word "free-born" into<br />

"freeman," but the ancient landmark never<br />

has been removed in America .<br />

<strong>The</strong> non-admission <strong>of</strong> a slave seems to have<br />

been founded upon the best <strong>of</strong> reasons; because,<br />

as <strong>Freemasonry</strong> involves a solemn contract,<br />

no one can legally bind himself to its<br />

performance who is not a free agent and the<br />

master <strong>of</strong> his own actions. That the restriction<br />

is extended to those who were originally<br />

in a servile condition, but who may have since<br />

acquired their liberty, seems to depend on the<br />

principle that birth in a servile condition is<br />

accompanied by a degradation <strong>of</strong> mind and<br />

abasement <strong>of</strong> spirit which no subsequent dis.<br />

enthralment can so completely efface as to<br />

render the party qualified to perform his duties,<br />

as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency,<br />

and zeal" which are said to have distinguished<br />

our ancient brethren . "Children," says Oliver,<br />

"cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except<br />

they be born <strong>of</strong> a free woman ."<br />

<strong>The</strong> same usage existed in the spurious <strong>Freemasonry</strong><br />

or the mysteries <strong>of</strong> the ancient world,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re, no slave, or man born in slavery, could<br />

be initiated ; because the prerequisites imperatively<br />

demanded that the candidate should<br />

not only be a man <strong>of</strong> irreproachable manners,<br />

but also a free-born denizen <strong>of</strong> the country in<br />

which the mysteries were celebrated .<br />

Some <strong>Masonic</strong> writers have thought that in<br />

this regulation, in relation to free birth, some<br />

allusion is intended, both in the mysteries and<br />

in <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, to the relative conditions and<br />

characters <strong>of</strong> Isaac and Ishmael . <strong>The</strong> former<br />

-the accepted one, to whom the promise was<br />

given-was the son <strong>of</strong> a free woman, and the<br />

latter, who was cast forth to have "his hand<br />

against every man and every man's hand<br />

against him," was the child <strong>of</strong> a slave . Wherefore,<br />

we read that Sarah demanded <strong>of</strong> Abraham,<br />

"Cast out this bondwoman and her son ;<br />

for the son <strong>of</strong> the bondwoman shall not be heir<br />

with my son ." Dr . Oliver, in speaking <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grand festival with which Abraham celebrated<br />

the weaning <strong>of</strong> Isaac, says that be<br />

"had not paid the same compliment at the<br />

weaning <strong>of</strong> Ishmael, because he was the son <strong>of</strong><br />

a bondwoman, and consequently could not be<br />

admitted to participate in the <strong>Freemasonry</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> his father, which could only be conferred on<br />

free men born <strong>of</strong> free women ." <strong>The</strong> ancient<br />

Greeks were <strong>of</strong> the same opinion ; for they<br />

used the word Souxorpeaeia, or "slave manners,"<br />

to designate any very great impropriety<br />

<strong>of</strong> manners .<br />

Freedom. This is defined to be a state <strong>of</strong><br />

exemption from, the control or power <strong>of</strong><br />

another . <strong>The</strong> doctrine that Masons should<br />

enjoy unrestrained liberty, and be free in all<br />

their thoughts and actions, is carried so far in<br />

Masonry, that the <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England<br />

will not permit the initiation <strong>of</strong> a candidate<br />

who is only temporarily deprived <strong>of</strong> his liberty,<br />

or even in a place <strong>of</strong> confinement . (See<br />

Free .)<br />

It is evident that the word freedom is used<br />

in Masonry in a symbolical or metaphysical<br />

sense differing from its ordinary signification . ,<br />

While, in the application <strong>of</strong> the words free<br />

born and freeman, we use them in their usual<br />

legal acceptation, we combine freedom with<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!