Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FREE<br />
FREEDOM 281<br />
only temporarily in a place <strong>of</strong> confinement . In<br />
the year 1783, the Master <strong>of</strong> the Royal Military<br />
Lodge at Woolwich (No . 371) being confined,<br />
most probably for debt, in the King's<br />
Bench prison, at London, the Lodge, which<br />
was itinerant in its character and allowed to<br />
move from place to place with its regiment,<br />
adjourned, with its warrant <strong>of</strong> Constitution,<br />
to the Master in prison, where several Masons<br />
were made . <strong>The</strong> <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge, being informed<br />
<strong>of</strong> the circumstances, immediately<br />
summoned the Master and Wardens <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lodge "to answer for their conduct in making<br />
Masons in the King's Bench prison," and, at<br />
the same time, adopted a resolution, affirming<br />
that "it is inconsistent with the _principles <strong>of</strong><br />
Masonry for any Freemasons' odge to be<br />
held, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> making, passing, or<br />
raising Masons, in any prison or place <strong>of</strong> confinement."<br />
(Constitutions, 1784, p . 349 .)<br />
Free and Accepted . <strong>The</strong> title" Free and<br />
Accepted" first occurs in the Roberts Print <strong>of</strong><br />
1722, which is headed <strong>The</strong> Old Constitutions<br />
belonging to the Ancient and Honourable Society<br />
<strong>of</strong> Free and Accepted Masons, and was adopted<br />
by Dr. Anderson in the second edition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Book <strong>of</strong> Constitutions, published in 1738, the<br />
title <strong>of</strong> which is <strong>The</strong> New Book <strong>of</strong> Constitutions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Antient and Honourable Fraternity<br />
<strong>of</strong> Free and Accepted Masons . In the first<br />
edition <strong>of</strong> 1723 the title was, <strong>The</strong> Constitutions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Freemasons. <strong>The</strong> newer title continued<br />
to be used by the <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England,<br />
in which it was followed by those <strong>of</strong> Scotland<br />
and Ireland ; and a majority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Grand</strong><br />
Lodges in this country have adopted the same<br />
style, and call themselves <strong>Grand</strong> Lodges <strong>of</strong><br />
Free and Accepted Masons . (See Accepted .)<br />
<strong>The</strong> old lectures formerly used in England<br />
give the following account <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />
term :<br />
"<strong>The</strong> Masons who were selected to build<br />
the Temple <strong>of</strong> Solomon were declared FREE<br />
and were exempted, together with their descendants,<br />
from imposts, duties, and taxes .<br />
<strong>The</strong>y had also the privilege to bear arms . At<br />
the destruction <strong>of</strong> the Temple by Nebuchadnezzar,<br />
the posterity <strong>of</strong> these Masons were<br />
carried into captivity with the ancient Jews .<br />
But the good-will <strong>of</strong> Cyrus gave them permission<br />
to erect a second Temple, having set<br />
them at liberty for that purpose. It is from<br />
this epoch that we bear the name <strong>of</strong> Free and<br />
Accepted Masons ."<br />
Free Born. In all the old Constitutions,<br />
free birth is required as a requisite to the reception<br />
<strong>of</strong> Apprentices . Thus the Lansdowne<br />
MS . says, "That the prentice be able <strong>of</strong> birth,<br />
that is, freeborn ." So it is in the Edinburgh<br />
Kilwinning, the York, the Antiquity, and in<br />
every other manuscript that has been so far<br />
discovered . And hence, the modern Constitutions<br />
framed in 1721 continue the regulation<br />
. After the abolition <strong>of</strong> slavery in the<br />
West Indies by the British Parliament, the<br />
<strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England on September 1,<br />
1847, changed the word "free-born" into<br />
"freeman," but the ancient landmark never<br />
has been removed in America .<br />
<strong>The</strong> non-admission <strong>of</strong> a slave seems to have<br />
been founded upon the best <strong>of</strong> reasons; because,<br />
as <strong>Freemasonry</strong> involves a solemn contract,<br />
no one can legally bind himself to its<br />
performance who is not a free agent and the<br />
master <strong>of</strong> his own actions. That the restriction<br />
is extended to those who were originally<br />
in a servile condition, but who may have since<br />
acquired their liberty, seems to depend on the<br />
principle that birth in a servile condition is<br />
accompanied by a degradation <strong>of</strong> mind and<br />
abasement <strong>of</strong> spirit which no subsequent dis.<br />
enthralment can so completely efface as to<br />
render the party qualified to perform his duties,<br />
as a Mason, with that "freedom, fervency,<br />
and zeal" which are said to have distinguished<br />
our ancient brethren . "Children," says Oliver,<br />
"cannot inherit a free and noble spirit except<br />
they be born <strong>of</strong> a free woman ."<br />
<strong>The</strong> same usage existed in the spurious <strong>Freemasonry</strong><br />
or the mysteries <strong>of</strong> the ancient world,<br />
<strong>The</strong>re, no slave, or man born in slavery, could<br />
be initiated ; because the prerequisites imperatively<br />
demanded that the candidate should<br />
not only be a man <strong>of</strong> irreproachable manners,<br />
but also a free-born denizen <strong>of</strong> the country in<br />
which the mysteries were celebrated .<br />
Some <strong>Masonic</strong> writers have thought that in<br />
this regulation, in relation to free birth, some<br />
allusion is intended, both in the mysteries and<br />
in <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, to the relative conditions and<br />
characters <strong>of</strong> Isaac and Ishmael . <strong>The</strong> former<br />
-the accepted one, to whom the promise was<br />
given-was the son <strong>of</strong> a free woman, and the<br />
latter, who was cast forth to have "his hand<br />
against every man and every man's hand<br />
against him," was the child <strong>of</strong> a slave . Wherefore,<br />
we read that Sarah demanded <strong>of</strong> Abraham,<br />
"Cast out this bondwoman and her son ;<br />
for the son <strong>of</strong> the bondwoman shall not be heir<br />
with my son ." Dr . Oliver, in speaking <strong>of</strong> the<br />
grand festival with which Abraham celebrated<br />
the weaning <strong>of</strong> Isaac, says that be<br />
"had not paid the same compliment at the<br />
weaning <strong>of</strong> Ishmael, because he was the son <strong>of</strong><br />
a bondwoman, and consequently could not be<br />
admitted to participate in the <strong>Freemasonry</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> his father, which could only be conferred on<br />
free men born <strong>of</strong> free women ." <strong>The</strong> ancient<br />
Greeks were <strong>of</strong> the same opinion ; for they<br />
used the word Souxorpeaeia, or "slave manners,"<br />
to designate any very great impropriety<br />
<strong>of</strong> manners .<br />
Freedom. This is defined to be a state <strong>of</strong><br />
exemption from, the control or power <strong>of</strong><br />
another . <strong>The</strong> doctrine that Masons should<br />
enjoy unrestrained liberty, and be free in all<br />
their thoughts and actions, is carried so far in<br />
Masonry, that the <strong>Grand</strong> Lodge <strong>of</strong> England<br />
will not permit the initiation <strong>of</strong> a candidate<br />
who is only temporarily deprived <strong>of</strong> his liberty,<br />
or even in a place <strong>of</strong> confinement . (See<br />
Free .)<br />
It is evident that the word freedom is used<br />
in Masonry in a symbolical or metaphysical<br />
sense differing from its ordinary signification . ,<br />
While, in the application <strong>of</strong> the words free<br />
born and freeman, we use them in their usual<br />
legal acceptation, we combine freedom with<br />
I