Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
Mackey A G - Encylopedia of Freemasonry - The Grand Masonic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LANGES<br />
LANSDOWNE 4~5<br />
unwilling in times <strong>of</strong> trial, for the sake <strong>of</strong> expediency,<br />
to divest it <strong>of</strong> its secret character, it<br />
will be ever impossible to do so, even were the<br />
landmark not standing before us as an insurmountable<br />
obstacle ; because such change <strong>of</strong><br />
its character would be social suicide, and the<br />
death <strong>of</strong> the Order would follow its legalized<br />
exposure. <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, as a secret association,<br />
has lived unchanged for centuries ; as an<br />
open society, it would not last for as many<br />
years .<br />
24 . <strong>The</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> a speculative science<br />
upon an operative art, and the symbolic<br />
use and explanation <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>of</strong> that<br />
art, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> religious or moral<br />
teaching, constitute another landmark <strong>of</strong><br />
the Order . <strong>The</strong> Temple <strong>of</strong> Solomon was the<br />
symbolic cradle <strong>of</strong> the Institution, and, therefore,<br />
the reference to the Operative Masonry<br />
which constructed that magnificent edifice,<br />
to the materials and implements which<br />
were employed in its construction, and to<br />
the artists who were engaged in the building,<br />
are all component and essential parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
body <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, which could not be<br />
subtracted from it without an entire destruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the whole identity <strong>of</strong> the Order .<br />
Hence, all the comparatively modern rites<br />
<strong>of</strong> Masonry, however they may differ in<br />
other respects, religiously preserve this Temple<br />
history and these operative elements, as<br />
the substratum <strong>of</strong> all their modifications <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Masonic</strong> system .<br />
25. <strong>The</strong> last and crowning landmark <strong>of</strong> all<br />
is, that these landmarks can never be changed .<br />
Nothing can be subtracted from them-nothing<br />
can be added to them-not the slightest<br />
modification can be made in them . As they<br />
were received from our predecessors, we are<br />
bound by the most solemn obligations <strong>of</strong> duty<br />
to transmit them to our successors .<br />
Langes, Savalette de . <strong>The</strong> Master <strong>of</strong><br />
"Les Amis Reunis," who aided in founding<br />
the system <strong>of</strong> Philalethes in 1775 .<br />
Language, Universal . <strong>The</strong> invention <strong>of</strong><br />
a universal language, which men <strong>of</strong> all nations<br />
could understand and through which they<br />
could communicate their thoughts, has always<br />
been one <strong>of</strong> the Utopian dreams <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
philologists . In the seventeenth century,<br />
Dalgarno had written his Ars Signorum to<br />
prove the possibility <strong>of</strong> a universal character<br />
and a philosophical language . About the same<br />
time Bishop Wilkins published his Essay<br />
towards a Real Character and a Philosophical<br />
Language; and even the mathematical Leibnitz<br />
entertained the project <strong>of</strong> a universal language<br />
for all the world . It is not, therefore<br />
surprising, that when the so-called Leland<br />
Manuscript stated that the Masons concealed<br />
a "universelle longage," Mr . Locke, or whoever<br />
was the commentator on that document,<br />
should have been attracted by the statement .<br />
"A universal language," he says, "has been<br />
much desired by the learned <strong>of</strong> many ages . It<br />
is a thing rather to be wished than hoped for .<br />
But it seems the Masons pretend to have such<br />
a thing among them. If it be true, I guess it<br />
must be something like the language <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Pantomimes among the ancient Romans, who<br />
are said to be able, by signs only, to express<br />
and deliver any oration intelligibly to men <strong>of</strong><br />
all nations and languages ."<br />
<strong>The</strong> "guess" <strong>of</strong> the commentator was near<br />
the truth. A universal language founded on<br />
words is utterly impracticable. Even if once<br />
inaugurated by common consent, a thing itself<br />
impossible, the lapse <strong>of</strong> but a few years, and<br />
the continual innovation <strong>of</strong> new phrases,<br />
would soon destroy its universality . But there<br />
are signs and symbols which, by tacit consent,<br />
have always been recognized as the exponents<br />
<strong>of</strong> certain ideas, and these are everywhere<br />
understood . It is well known that such a system<br />
exists over the vast territory occupied by<br />
the North American savages, and that the<br />
Indians <strong>of</strong> two tribes, which totally differ in<br />
language, meeting on the prairie or in the forest,<br />
are enabled, by conventual signs <strong>of</strong> universal<br />
agreement, to hold long and intelligible<br />
intercourse . On such a basis the "universal<br />
language" <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong> is founded . It is<br />
not universal to the world, but it is to the<br />
Craft ; and a Mason <strong>of</strong> one country and language<br />
meeting a Mason <strong>of</strong> another can make<br />
himself understood for all practical purposes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Craft, simply because the system <strong>of</strong><br />
signs and symbols has been so perfected that<br />
in every language they convey the same meaning<br />
and make the same impression . This, and<br />
this only, is the extent to which the universal<br />
language <strong>of</strong> Masonry reaches . It would be an<br />
error to suppose that it meets the expectations<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dalgarno or Wilkins, or any other<br />
dreamer, and .that it is so perfect as to supersede<br />
the necessity <strong>of</strong> any other method <strong>of</strong> intercommunication<br />
.<br />
Lansdowne MS. This version <strong>of</strong> the Old<br />
Charges is <strong>of</strong> very early date, about the middle<br />
or latter half <strong>of</strong> the sixteenth century, as these<br />
Free Masons Orders and Constitutions are believed<br />
to have been part <strong>of</strong> the collection made<br />
by Lord Burghley (Sec. <strong>of</strong> State, temp. Edward<br />
VI.), who died A .D. 1598.<br />
Bro. Gould, in his History (vol. i ., p . 61),<br />
says the "MS . is contained on the inner side<br />
<strong>of</strong> three sheets and a half <strong>of</strong> stout paper,<br />
eleven by fifteen inches, making in all seven<br />
folios, many <strong>of</strong> the principal words being in<br />
large letters <strong>of</strong> an ornamental character . Mr.<br />
Sims (MS. Department <strong>of</strong> the British Museum)<br />
does not consider these `Orders' ever<br />
formed a roll, though there are indications <strong>of</strong><br />
the sheets having been stitched together at<br />
the top, and paper or vellum was used for<br />
additional protection . It has evidently `seen<br />
service.' It was published in Freemasons'<br />
Mag., February 24, 1858, and Hughan's Old<br />
Charges (p. 31), and since in facsimile by the<br />
Quatuor Coronati Lodge . <strong>The</strong> catalogue <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lansdowne MSS.-which consisted <strong>of</strong> twelve<br />
hundred and forty-five volumes, bought by<br />
Parliament, in 1807, for £4925-has the folowing<br />
Rote on the contents <strong>of</strong> this document :