13.07.2015 Views

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

consciousness-based education and governmentlems <strong>of</strong> society on any level, be it social, economic, political, religious,or any other” (1978, p. 164).Individual <strong>Consciousness</strong> and Collective <strong>Consciousness</strong>According to <strong>Maharishi</strong> Vedic Science, the quality <strong>of</strong> life in any nationis ultimately determined by the quality <strong>of</strong> what <strong>Maharishi</strong> calls the collectiveconsciousness <strong>of</strong> the nation. Each level <strong>of</strong> society—family, community,city, state, nation, or the entire world—is described as havingits own characteristic collective consciousness, which is the wholeness<strong>of</strong> consciousness <strong>of</strong> the entire group (<strong>Maharishi</strong> Mahesh Yogi, 1977,pp. 123–124). The most fundamental level <strong>of</strong> collective consciousnessis the same as that <strong>of</strong> individual consciousness, the unified field <strong>of</strong> pureconsciousness (<strong>Maharishi</strong> Mahesh Yogi, 1985, pp. 56–76). Just as thequality <strong>of</strong> the behavior <strong>of</strong> the individual is an expression <strong>of</strong> the quality<strong>of</strong> individual consciousness, the quality <strong>of</strong> behavior in society is seen asan integrated expression <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> collective consciousness <strong>of</strong> theindividuals <strong>of</strong> the nation.The view that society may possess some form <strong>of</strong> collective consciousnesshas also been expressed by the leading social thinker Emile Durkheim(1951). As described by Dillbeck et al. (1987), the empirical support forDurkheim’s views was not persuasive, and his concept <strong>of</strong> collective consciencehas therefore had little impact on the mainstream <strong>of</strong> sociologicalthought. By contrast, <strong>Maharishi</strong> provides a precise and complete description<strong>of</strong> collective consciousness and its relationship to individual consciousnesswhich is readily amenable to empirical testing. Empirical tests<strong>of</strong> <strong>Maharishi</strong>’s description <strong>of</strong> collective consciousness are facilitated bythe fact that he has provided a practical and effective technology for systematicallyinfluencing the quality <strong>of</strong> collective consciousness in society.Violation <strong>of</strong> natural law: The basis <strong>of</strong> all problems in society. Akey feature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maharishi</strong>’s description <strong>of</strong> collective consciousness isthat individual and collective consciousness reciprocally influence eachother. Due to this reciprocal relationship between individual and collectiveconsciousness, an increase in stress and tension in individualconsciousness will be mirrored in the quality <strong>of</strong> collective consciousness,and vice versa (<strong>Maharishi</strong> Mahesh Yogi, 1978, pp. 258–262;<strong>Maharishi</strong> European Research <strong>University</strong>, 1982a, p. 6). Just as prob-398

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!