13.07.2015 Views

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Influence <strong>of</strong> Natural Law tHeoryActs <strong>of</strong> Parliament that are impossible to be performed are <strong>of</strong> no validity;and if there arise out <strong>of</strong> them collaterally any absurd consequences, manifestlycontradictory to common reason, they are, with regard to thosecollateral consequences, void. I lay down the rule with these restrictions:I know it is generally laid down more largely, that acts <strong>of</strong> Parliamentcontrary to reason are void. But if the Parliament will positively enacta thing to be done which is unreasonable, I know <strong>of</strong> no power in theordinary forms <strong>of</strong> the Constitution that is bested with the authority tocontrol it. (Blackstone, 1771, Vol. V, p. 79)The English revolution established Parliament’s superiority, although,ironically, it was the superiority <strong>of</strong> natural law to man-made law and theauthority <strong>of</strong> the King, which provided the justification for the revolutionand the overthrow <strong>of</strong> the monarchy. The monarchy was reestablishedby the people when William and Mary were invited to rule by an act <strong>of</strong>Parliament. Since Parliament was an expression <strong>of</strong> the will <strong>of</strong> the peopleand the monarchy was now subservient to it, Englishmen felt that theirnatural rights would be protected by Parliament because Parliamentreflected the natural law that was the basis <strong>of</strong> the revolution.The colonists did not share this confidence in Parliament. Since theBritish Parliament did not represent them or the interests <strong>of</strong> the colonies,they did not share the Englishman’s belief in Parliament’s infallibility.Protesting laws they deemed unfair, the colonists repeatedly expressedthe contention that acts <strong>of</strong> Parliament, man-made laws, were not validif they violated natural law. When the attempt to reconcile their differenceswas not successful, an appeal to the rights granted under naturallaw formed the basis <strong>of</strong> the rationale for the colonies to break awayfrom their mother country. The Declaration <strong>of</strong> Independence written toKing George and adopted by the Second Continental Congress in 1776explained their actions to the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. (Maier, 1998, p. 20)Relying on Coke’s understanding <strong>of</strong> common law, the colonistsrejected the supremacy <strong>of</strong> Parliament and the authority <strong>of</strong> the King,and cited the grievances outlined in the Declaration <strong>of</strong> Independenceas justification for separation from the mother country.When in the course <strong>of</strong> human events it becomes necessary for one peopleto dissolve the political bands which have connected them one withanother, and to assume among the powers <strong>of</strong> the earth the separate andequal station to which the laws <strong>of</strong> nature and <strong>of</strong> nature’s god entitle83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!