13.07.2015 Views

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consciousness-based education and governmentexpected level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction, happiness and well-being for individuals,but led rather, in spite <strong>of</strong> increased material comfort, leisure and easycommunication, to a life increasingly beset with problems (Liu, 1974).Social scientists have approached the concept <strong>of</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life fromdifferent perspectives in an attempt to find its proper definition. Thetrend <strong>of</strong> consensus appears to be that quality <strong>of</strong> life is a unitary constructinvolving all <strong>of</strong> the conditions <strong>of</strong> a person’s life as a whole (Gitter& Mast<strong>of</strong>sky, 1973). There is general agreement that the quality <strong>of</strong> lifeis related to a number <strong>of</strong> different components—physical, biological,social, economic, cultural—all <strong>of</strong> which pertain to the individual/enviromentalinterface (Bunge, 1975).Two main streams <strong>of</strong> investigation developed in the attempt to measurequality <strong>of</strong> life: subjective social indicators and objective indicators.Subjective indicators reflect subjective evaluations derived fromrespondents’ own ratings <strong>of</strong> their lives, either as a whole or <strong>of</strong> someaspect <strong>of</strong> them. Objective indicators usually represent purely externalfactors such as factual information about the quality <strong>of</strong> life accumulatedin statistical data.Unexpectedly, a common research finding suggests thatimprovements in objective indicators are not necessarily correlated withimprovements in subjective indicators. Schneider (1975) concludesthat, “Despite the <strong>of</strong>ten found assumption that objective socialindicators data actually reflect the quality <strong>of</strong> life experienced by people,we have no reason to a priori assume that such a correlation exists.”Actual research findings indicate that there are very large differencesbetween experienced quality <strong>of</strong> life and the evaluation <strong>of</strong> objectivecriteria (Campbell, 1976; Duncan, 1975; Schneider, 1975, 1976). Thesefindings challenge the widespread assumption that the way to improvethe quality <strong>of</strong> life is to improve outer circumstances.This paper investigates an alternative approach to bringing aboutsocial change in the direction <strong>of</strong> a more harmonious, healthy functioning<strong>of</strong> the society as a whole while ensuring the optimal well-being <strong>of</strong>its members. <strong>Maharishi</strong> Mahesh Yogi (1986) revived traditional Vedicknowledge by developing a set <strong>of</strong> practices, the <strong>Maharishi</strong> Technology<strong>of</strong> the Unified Field (MTUF), consisting <strong>of</strong> the Transcendental Meditation(TM) and TM-Sidhi program, which are predicted to enliven anunderlying field <strong>of</strong> pure consciousness. In addition, he has articulated536

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!