13.07.2015 Views

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

Consciousness-Based Education - Maharishi University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consciousness-based education and GovernmentN tis a stochastic noise component, to be empirically determined,which may take the form <strong>of</strong> any stationary and invertible autoregressivemoving average (ARMA) process.The linear transfer function (LTF) method was used to empiricallyidentify the transfer function model (Liu, 1985, 1986; Liu and Hudak,1986; Pankratz, 1991). The LTF procedure is a refinement <strong>of</strong> the “leastsquares”approach to the identification <strong>of</strong> transfer function models, whichhas been shown to outperform the standard “pre-whitening” identificationprocedure based on cross correlations (Liu and Hanssens, 1982). Amajor advantage <strong>of</strong> the LTF procedure is that, unlike the prewhiteningprocedure, it is readily generalized to multiple input series (Pankratz,1991). It can also be applied to the identification <strong>of</strong> transfer functions forbinary intervention variables. A further advantage <strong>of</strong> the LTF method isthat simulation studies have shown it to be very effective in detecting thelack <strong>of</strong> relation ships between variables which are, in fact, unrelated, thusreducing the probability <strong>of</strong> spurious findings (Liu, 1985).Using the LTF approach, initial estimates <strong>of</strong> the impulse responseweights for each input variable were based on maximum likelihoodestimates <strong>of</strong> the TF equation after approximating each transfer functionby a linear polynomial <strong>of</strong> impulse response weights V i(B) (Liu,1985). The impulse response weights were given by the estimated coefficients<strong>of</strong> the following polynomialsV i(B) = v i0+ v i1B + v i2B 2 + … + v imB m , i = 1, 2with the maximum lag m set to four months. For the endogenous inputvariable US t, the lag-zero (contemporaneous) impulse response weightv i0was set equal to zero in order to avoid possible simultaneous equationbias (Liu and Hudak, 1985). 1The noise component was initially specified as a first-order autoregressiveprocess since there was no suggestion <strong>of</strong> annual seasonality inthe estimated autocorrelations for the dependent variable USSR t. Thetentative, initial assumption <strong>of</strong> an AR(1) noise process—which may bemodified at a later stage, if appropriate—allows a check for the possiblenecessity <strong>of</strong> differencing and will generally improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> theinitial estimates <strong>of</strong> the impulse response weights (Liu, 1985). 2 A formaltest for mean nonstationarity was also applied to both the dependentvariable USSR tand the independent variable US t. The Phillips-Perronunit root test (Phillips and Perron, 1988) was used for this purpose.464

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!