DOWNLOAD Genocide in Our Time - NewFoundations

Realities Based on Ottoman Documents"; and KamuranGuriin, "Causes and Prevention of Armenian Terrorism." Paul Henze, in "The Roots of Armenian Violence:How Far Back Do They Extend?, " articulatesbest the inain purpose of the above papers. He beginsby asking: "Is there something unusual about Armeniansas a people, or about their historical experience,that has made them prone to violence?" (p. 179) Hegoes back to the beginning of history to search for ananswer to this question. Henze finds it in the defectsof historiography. "Armenian history has been studiedand written almost entirely by Armenians. The samecan be said, though perhaps not to the same degree,of many other peoples, such as the Georgians, Bulgarians,and Hungarians, who have tenaciously survivedthe vicissitudes of history. But Armenians seem torepresent an extreme case, much more so than Jews,e. g. People [sic] who write their own history tend toglorify their past and avoid objective examination ofcontroversial features of it. " (p. 180)~ 5. 19 ~British Documents on Ottoman Armenians, Volume I(1856-1880), Volume Il (1880-1856). Ed. by Bilal N.$imsir. Ankara: Turkish Historical Society, 1982,1983. LC 83-217095. The introduction to volume I wasissued separately as The Genesis of the ArmenianQuestion.This publication contains a large collection ofBritish documents from the Foreign Office. It includesreports by consuls in the interior of Turkey, dispatchesby the Ambassador in Constantinople, and instructionsby the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. Thedocuments paint a good picture of the lawlessness inthe countryside, the shortcomings of the Ottomangovernment, the venality of the justice system, theextent of brigandage by Kurdish tribesmen, and thehelplessness of the unarmed Christian population ingeneral. Yet in a transparent exercise in selectivity,$imgir writes an introduction to the collection thatrelies solely on reports critical of, or unflattering to,the Armenians. In a thesis belied by the majority ofthe documents, the editor argues that the reformmeasures the British encouraged were an avenuewhereby the Christian minorities improved their loteconomically to the detriment of the Muslim majority.Still the British purposefully agitated discontent in theArmenian communities as an excuse for intervention.As a result of the War of 1877-78, the Armenians alsoentered into secret relations with the Russians. Thelatter encouraged the idea of autonomy for the Armenianswho only formed a minority in the provinces.According to $imgir, the Armenians "were a merepawn" in the "Anglo-Russian rivalry over EasternTurkey. " The Armenian leaders who advocated reformor western patronage were responsible for "bringingunrest and suffering to their own people. " (p. 22) The$imsir volumes are part of a trend in revisionisthistoriography which aspires to accomplish two things:1) to be credited with objectivity by publishing documents;and 2) to deflect attention from the genocideby widening the field of controversy to encompass theentire last century of Armenian existence in the OttomanEmpire.The Disinformers* 5. 20 *Ataov, Turkkaya. A Brief Glance at the "ArmenianQuestion". Ankara: Ankara Chambre of Commerce,1984. Hitler and the "Armenian Question". Ankara,1984. The Andonian "Documents "Attributedto TalaatPasha Are Forgeries! Ankara: Ankara Universitesi'S iyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi, 1984. A 'Statement WronglyAttributed to Mustafa Kemal Atattirk. Ankara: AnkaraUniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi, 1984.This set of booklets was written by the chair ofRelations Division of the Faculty ofthe InternationalPolitical Science at Ankara University. Meant forpopular consumption, the publications revisit the themesof denial in a condensed form. They were all producedin response to the wave of Armenian terrorism and thepublicity surrounding it.The first booklet, after quickly summarizing allof Armenian history in a few pages and demonstratingthe extent of Ottoman reliance on Armenian civilservants, begins discussion of the genocide in thefollowing manner: "The events surrounding the transfer[sic] of the Armenian population in 1915 had to beexamined in the light of active Armenian collaborationwith the Tsarist Russian forces, Turkey's enemy duringthe First World War. " (p. 33)The second pamphlet disputes Hitler's statementon the extermination of the Armenians on the groundsthat Hitler was "no historian. " (p. 5) Ataov maintainsthat by using the Hitler statement "militant Armeniansare exerting every effort to make the Jews and othersbelieve that they are also another persecuted minority. "(p. 8) Thereafter Ataov attempts to demonstrate "theinclinations of"[Armenian] anti-semitism, (p. 8)including the charge that "volunteer Armenian troopsunder the wings of Hitler's Germany during the SecondWorld War were used in rounding up Jews and other'undesirables' destined for the Nazi concentrationcamps. " (p. 9)The third booklet reviews the $inasi Orel workon the same subject. In the preface, the work isdescribed by Prof. Necdet Serin, Dean of the Facultyof Political Science at Ankara University, as "the firstThe Armenian Genocide: Revisionism and Denial 101