of structured social <strong>in</strong>equality, creates conditionsconducive to the outbreak of overt violence, particularly<strong>in</strong> the form of revolution and civil war. Second, bydivert<strong>in</strong>g societal resources from programs to meethuman needs and by destroy<strong>in</strong>g portions of the economic<strong>in</strong>frastructure, armed violence tends to aggravate theeconomic and social conditions that cause structuralviolence.THE PREPARATIONSFOR NUCLEAR OMNICIDENo discussion of governmental mass kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>general, and genocide and modern war <strong>in</strong> particular,can be complete without reference to the preparations,by a diverse group of nations, for a war waged withnuclear weapons. For nearly fifty years, the UnitedStates and the Soviet Union held the world under thethreat of nuclear holocaust by their policies of deterrencethrough the threat of mutually assured destruction,a threat that was backed up by the deploymentof more than 50, 000 nuclear weapons. As this bookgoes to press <strong>in</strong> 1992, the United States and the newleaders of the former Soviet Union, particularly BorisYelts<strong>in</strong>, the president of the Russian Republic, haveentered a period of unprecedented cooperation and havemade prelim<strong>in</strong>ary agreements to dramatically reducethe size of their nuclear stockpiles. ~ There is no doubtthat the risk of a massive nuclear war between the U. S.and the former Soviet Union has significantly dim<strong>in</strong>ished.However, complacency is by no means warranted.There are still tens of thousands of nuclear warheads<strong>in</strong> the arsenals of the United States, Russia, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e,Belarus, and Kazhakstan. These weapons collectivelypossess the explosive equivalent of more than onemillion atomic bombs like those that destroyed theJapanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki <strong>in</strong> theclos<strong>in</strong>g days of World War II. Ambitious plans toreduce these arsenals could founder if the currenteconomic chaos <strong>in</strong> the former Soviet Union provokesthe overthrow of the democratically elected governmentsand their replacement by militaristic hardl<strong>in</strong>ers.Yelts<strong>in</strong> himself, <strong>in</strong> a meet<strong>in</strong>g with President Bush early<strong>in</strong> 1992, warned that the Cold War could return ifimprovements <strong>in</strong> the lives of Russians and other formerSoviets are not made so'on. He was quoted by the WallStreet Journal as tell<strong>in</strong>g President Bush, "if reform <strong>in</strong>Russia goes under, that means there will be a coldwar — the cold war will turn <strong>in</strong>to "" a hot war — this isaga<strong>in</strong> go<strong>in</strong>g to be an arms race.In addition to the United States and the formerSoviet Union, several other nations have acquirednuclear weapons capability, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>a, France,Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, India, Israel, Pakistan, and South Africa;and other nations, like Libya, Iraq, and North Korea,are striv<strong>in</strong>g to obta<strong>in</strong> nuclear weapons. ~ Indeed, oneof the reasons the United States gave for the use ofmilitary force aga<strong>in</strong>st Iraq <strong>in</strong> the Persian Gulf War of1991 was the fear that the Iraqis would soon possessnuclear weapons. ~As yet, these nuclear arsenals pose only a potentialthreat to humank<strong>in</strong>d; those nations that possess nuclearweapons do so <strong>in</strong> order to deter the use of nuclear and,<strong>in</strong> some cases, non-nuclear, weapons aga<strong>in</strong>st them.However, <strong>in</strong> order for such deterrence to be credible,the nuclear-armed nations must be ready and will<strong>in</strong>gto actually use the weapons. In recent years, a numberof authorities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g retired military officers andformer government officials, have warned that presentnuclear deterrence arrangements are dangerouslyunstable. They cite the likely spread of nuclear weaponsto additional nations <strong>in</strong> some of the most crisis-proneregions of the world and possibly to terrorist groups";the grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers of so-called first strike weaponsdesigned more for fight<strong>in</strong>g nuclear wars than simplydeterr<strong>in</strong>g them"; the existence of nuclear policy makerswho argue that it is possible to fight, w<strong>in</strong>, and survivea nuclear war"; and serious problems <strong>in</strong> arrangementsfor ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g control over nuclear weapons <strong>in</strong> theevent that deterrence fails and nuclear war breaks out. ~If even a fraction of the exist<strong>in</strong>g nuclear arsenalswere used <strong>in</strong> combat, it is likely that more peoplewould die than <strong>in</strong> any genocide or war <strong>in</strong> history. Onestudy by the United States Congressional Office ofTechnology Assessment estimated that a "large" Sovietattack on the United States could cause as many as160, 000, 000 deaths." A study by the World HealthOrganization calculated that a war fought with aboutone-half of the exist<strong>in</strong>g Soviet and American nuclearweapons would promptly kill as many as 1, 100, 000, 000and that another billion would die with<strong>in</strong> the first yearas a result of radiation exposure, untreatedburns andother <strong>in</strong>juries, the lack of food and water, and otherdeprivations." This statement, made <strong>in</strong> the mid-1980s,is still valid <strong>in</strong> 1992.In addition to directly-caused deaths and <strong>in</strong>juries,nuclear war would cause great damage to the environment.For example, the smoke and soot from firesstarted by nuclear detonations are likely to drift <strong>in</strong>tothe higher levels of the earth's atmosphere and reducethe amount of sunlight and heat that reaches thesurface. This would create what scientists have calleda "nuclear w<strong>in</strong>ter" and drastically reduce the survivalchances for anyone who survived the <strong>in</strong>itial effects ofthe war. " Reputable scientists have even warned thatthe possibility of human ext<strong>in</strong>ction cannot be ruled outas a consequence of nuclear war and nuclear w<strong>in</strong>ter."Some scholars have questioned the appropriatenessof the term "war" when used <strong>in</strong> connection with nuclear120 GENOCIDE
weapons, given their unprecedented destructiveness.As an alternative to the mislead<strong>in</strong>g concept of "nuclearwar, " philosopher John Somerville has proposed theterm "nuclear omnicide, " to convey the probability thata war fought with nuclear weapons would constitutea categorically new dimension of mass kill<strong>in</strong>g."Somerville co<strong>in</strong>ed omnicide from the Lat<strong>in</strong> words omnimean<strong>in</strong>g "all" and cide mean<strong>in</strong>g "to kill. " In recognitionof the uniquely destructive nature of nuclearweapons, and the fact that they are deeply embedded<strong>in</strong> the national security arrangements of several nations,Lifton and Markusen have suggested the concept of anuclear "genocidal system. " "A " genocidal system, theywrite, "is not a matter of aparticular weapons structureor strategic concept so much as an overall constellationof men, weapons, and war-fight<strong>in</strong> plans which, ifimplemented,could end human civilization <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utesand the greater part of human life on the planet with<strong>in</strong>hours. . . . "~GENOCIDE AND MODERN WAR AS FORMSOF GOVERNMENTAL MASS KILLINGSome scholars regard genocide and war as quitedifferent phenomena. For example, sociologist Horowitzasserts that "it is operationally imperative todist<strong>in</strong>guish warfare from genocide, " and politicalscientist R. J. Rummel has stated that "There are nocommon conditions "" or causes of domestic and foreignconflict behavior. Similarly, <strong>in</strong> their discussion ofdef<strong>in</strong>itions of genocide, Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohnemphasize that it is "essential. .. to exclude fromour analysis the casualties of war, whether military orof the available"" civilian. In her recent critiqueliterature on this question, Helen Fe<strong>in</strong> asserts that "Thequestion of whether kill<strong>in</strong>gs of civilians <strong>in</strong> war are warcrimes, consequences of acts of war admissable underthe war convention, or acts of genocide has beenclouded by the fact that genocide-labell<strong>in</strong>g of warstoday is often a rhetorical strategem for politicaldelegitimation of specific wars which the labelleropposes. "" However, it is important to note thatgenocide and modern war are not as dist<strong>in</strong>ct andseparate as some have asserted them to be; otherscholars have discerned important connections betweenthem. ~GENOCIDEAccord<strong>in</strong>g to political scientist Roger Smith, thetwentieth century "is an age of genocide <strong>in</strong> which sixtymillion men, women, and children, com<strong>in</strong>g from manydifferent races, religions, ethnic groups, nationalities,and social classes, and liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> many different countries,on most of the cont<strong>in</strong>ents of the earth, have hadtheir "" lives taken because the state thought it desirable.A partial list<strong>in</strong>g of twentieth century genocides<strong>in</strong>cludes the kill<strong>in</strong>g of more than 1, 000, 000 Armeniansby the Turks <strong>in</strong> 1915; the Holocaust <strong>in</strong> which6, 000, 000 Jews and 4, 000, 000 members of other victimgroups were killed by the Nazis between 1939 and1945; the slaughter of approximately 3, 000, 000 Ibotribesmen by other Nigerians between 1967 and 1970;the massacre of more than 1, 000, 000 Bengalis by thethe army of East Pakistan <strong>in</strong> 1971; and the kill<strong>in</strong>g ofas many as 2, 000, 000 Cambodians by the KhmerRouge between 1975 and 1979. " An analysis ofgenocides and closely-related forms of mass kill<strong>in</strong>gs<strong>in</strong>ce 1945 found forty-four "episodes" of genocidalviolence that, collectively, took the lives of "betweenseven and sixteen million people, at least as many whodied <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>ternational and civil wars <strong>in</strong> the period. "4'Recent scholarship has <strong>in</strong>dicated that death tollsfrom past cases of genocidal kill<strong>in</strong>g may be far greaterthan has been thought. In a meticulous analysis of justone case — the Soviet Union between 1917 and1987 — R. J. Rummel estimates that dur<strong>in</strong>g that seventyyear period, "Probably 61, 911, 000people, 54, 769, 000of them citizens, have been murderedby the Commu-nist party, the government of the Soviet Union. "~The basic act of def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genocide is problematicand controversial. Despite a plethora of recent scholarshipon def<strong>in</strong>itional issues, a widely accepted def<strong>in</strong>itionof genocide cont<strong>in</strong>ues to elude scholars. 4' The def<strong>in</strong>itionaldilemma has been complicated by the misapplica-tion of the term. As Jack Nusan Porter notes, the labelof "genocide" has been applied, <strong>in</strong>appropriately, to thefollow<strong>in</strong>g practices: racial <strong>in</strong>tegration, methadonema<strong>in</strong>tenance programs, certa<strong>in</strong> features of the medicaltreatment of Irish Catholics, and the clos<strong>in</strong>g of synagogues<strong>in</strong> the Soviet Union. ~Raphael Lemk<strong>in</strong> co<strong>in</strong>ed the term "genocide" <strong>in</strong>his 1944 book, Axis Rule <strong>in</strong> Occupied Europe, whichconta<strong>in</strong>edone of the first detailed accounts of Nazipersecution of Jews and other groups. Lemk<strong>in</strong> derivedthe term from the Greek word genos, which means"race" or "tribe, " and the Lat<strong>in</strong> word cide, mean<strong>in</strong>g"to " kill. Thus, he def<strong>in</strong>ed genocide "" as "the destructionof a nation or ethnic group. In addition to directmass kill<strong>in</strong>g, such "destruction" could assume otherforms, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g destruction of cultural heritage andprevention of procreation. Lemk<strong>in</strong>'s def<strong>in</strong>ition servedas the basis for the first formal, legal def<strong>in</strong>ition ofgenocide, which was codified <strong>in</strong> 1948 <strong>in</strong> the UnitedNations Convention on the Prevention and Punishmentof the Crime of <strong>Genocide</strong>. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Convention,genocide refers to "acts committed with <strong>in</strong>tent todestroy, <strong>in</strong> whole or <strong>in</strong> part, a national, ethnical, racial,<strong>Genocide</strong> and Modern War 121
- Page 1 and 2:
GenocldeIn OurTlme- ,*"f* *An Annot
- Page 3:
DEDICATIONTo Raphael Lemkin(1901-19
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 5:The Armenian Genocide: Re
- Page 8 and 9:
Appendix 167Appendix: Chronology of
- Page 10 and 11:
ending sources of joy and hope. In
- Page 12 and 13:
Massive human suffering caused by p
- Page 14 and 15:
world without any reification and u
- Page 16 and 17:
CIIAPTER IETHNOCIDEby Alison Palmer
- Page 18 and 19:
als are tempted away by the promise
- Page 20 and 21:
Interactionsof Ethnocide and Genoci
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 1: AnnotatedBibliographyRea
- Page 24 and 25:
the inevitable extinction of tribal
- Page 26 and 27:
upon the purge of cultural and scie
- Page 28 and 29:
traditional ethnic and socio-cultur
- Page 30 and 31:
whites. Lizot proposes that integra
- Page 32 and 33:
¹ 1. 53 ¹Olson, James S. , and Ra
- Page 34 and 35:
tion of indigenes into state politi
- Page 36 and 37:
as a potential irredentist national
- Page 38 and 39:
serious questions about the notion
- Page 40 and 41:
ate and beleaguered institutions th
- Page 42 and 43:
In one of the most important works
- Page 44 and 45:
focusing on children, the most vuln
- Page 46 and 47:
~ 2. 35 ~Sereny, Gita. Into That Da
- Page 48 and 49:
were less than 200 Jewish survivors
- Page 50 and 51:
~ 2. 68 ~Nomberg-Przytyk, Sara. Aus
- Page 52 and 53:
of the war. The movement was known
- Page 54 and 55:
~ 2. 103 ~Wyman, David S. The Aband
- Page 56 and 57:
* 2. 122 ~Wiesenthal, Simon. The Su
- Page 58 and 59:
and Christianity. He argues that it
- Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 3THE ISSUE OF THE HOLOCAUST
- Page 62 and 63:
if we are to escape the mystificati
- Page 64 and 65:
outside the normal dimensions of ou
- Page 66 and 67:
historical event. All transformatio
- Page 68 and 69:
32. For an excellent understanding
- Page 70 and 71:
3 7Berenbaum, Michael. "The Uniquen
- Page 72 and 73:
Holocaust, a meaning with which we
- Page 74 and 75:
the Nazi exterminating drive, a pos
- Page 76 and 77:
framework, Marrus accepts the Holoc
- Page 78 and 79:
as "the cement of Jewish identity,
- Page 80 and 81: 'cry and you cry alone. ' So we kep
- Page 82 and 83: of the body, combined with so many
- Page 84 and 85: 10. Lawrence Langer, Versions of Su
- Page 86 and 87: ~ 4. 10 ~Sichrovsky, Peter. Born Gu
- Page 88 and 89: Appendix: The Diaryby Agi Rubinwith
- Page 90 and 91: ella story. We could have eaten all
- Page 92 and 93: which hardly anybody remains? Who k
- Page 94 and 95: find a wise one who will solve it.
- Page 96 and 97: Chapter 5THE ARMENIANGENOCIDE:REVIS
- Page 98 and 99: The genocide was the culmination of
- Page 100 and 101: Abdications and Retributions Turkey
- Page 102 and 103: scene. They primarily targeted the
- Page 104 and 105: Turkish and non-Turkish apologists
- Page 106 and 107: and London: University Press of New
- Page 108 and 109: supporters of Armenian independence
- Page 110 and 111: that the history of the Armenians c
- Page 112 and 113: Realities Based on Ottoman Document
- Page 114 and 115: designed to falsely accuse Ottoman
- Page 116 and 117: and Western gullibility and predile
- Page 118 and 119: ambition to retain as much of Russi
- Page 120 and 121: Terror-FamineMemoir literature and
- Page 122 and 123: independence and viability of the U
- Page 124 and 125: So many members of the All-Ukraine
- Page 126 and 127: ~ 6. 26 ~Heller, Mikhail, and Aleks
- Page 128 and 129: ousness of the present one. In his
- Page 132 and 133: or religious group, as such. "" The
- Page 134 and 135: and the general degradation of publ
- Page 136 and 137: easier by the fact that those who'd
- Page 138 and 139: 26. William Safire, "Object: Surviv
- Page 140 and 141: 74. Quoted in Paul Walker and Eric
- Page 142 and 143: es: People in the Machines of Death
- Page 144 and 145: ¹ 7. 16 ¹Dadrian, Vahakn N. "A Th
- Page 146 and 147: Corporate Enterprise at Auschwitz"
- Page 148 and 149: * 7. 47 +Nolan, Janne E. , and Albe
- Page 150 and 151: and sometimes irrational. " (p. 7)
- Page 152 and 153: able to evaluate various nuclear we
- Page 154 and 155: In an angry, stimulating book, Aske
- Page 156 and 157: Lang reflects on how technology fac
- Page 158 and 159: This is a pioneering collection of
- Page 160 and 161: "good reasons" for not offering the
- Page 162 and 163: take consistent ethical actions aga
- Page 164 and 165: sadisChart: Taking a Stand Against
- Page 166 and 167: This indicator refers to an advance
- Page 168 and 169: 14. Louis Rene Beres, "Genocide, St
- Page 170 and 171: to horrible new acts of violence ag
- Page 172 and 173: * 8. 27 ~Horowitz, Irving Louis. Ge
- Page 174 and 175: ~ 8. 41 ~Lifton, Robert J. , and Er
- Page 176 and 177: ~ 8. 56 ~Thompson, John L. P. "Geno
- Page 178 and 179: CountryDatesPer petratorsVictimsEst
- Page 180 and 181:
Dwork, DeborahDyer, Gwynne. . . . .
- Page 182 and 183:
Morgenthau, Henry . . . . . '. . .
- Page 184 and 185:
TITLE INDEXThe Abandonment of the J
- Page 186 and 187:
"Epilogue: The Nuclear Arms Raceand
- Page 188 and 189:
The Industrialization of Soviet Rus
- Page 190 and 191:
Psychiatric Aspects of the Preventi
- Page 192:
When Memory ComesWhile Six Million