and sometimes irrational. " (p. 7) The chapters that ~ 7. 62 ~follow <strong>in</strong>dicate that later American nuclear war plans Ford, Danieh?he Button: ?he Pentagon's Commandare by no means free of such problems; nor are those and Control System. New York: Simon & Schuster,of other nuclear-armed nations. Of particular impor- 1985. LC 84-27616. ISBN 0-671-50068-6.tance are the chapters by David Rosenberg, "U. S.On the basis of extensive <strong>in</strong>terviews with keyNuclear War Plann<strong>in</strong>g, 1945-1960;" Ball, "The policymakers and decision makers, Ford identifies manyDevelopment of the SIOP, 1960-1983;" Richelson, fundamental problems <strong>in</strong> the arrangements for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>-"Population Target<strong>in</strong>g and U. S. Strategic Doctr<strong>in</strong>e;" <strong>in</strong>g control over nuclear weapons dur<strong>in</strong>g both <strong>in</strong>tenseand David Cattell and George Quester, "Ethnic Target<strong>in</strong>g:Some Bad Ideas. " <strong>in</strong>ternational crises and actual conflict. He asserts that"Ethnic target<strong>in</strong>g" refers to the there is a sizeable "gap between official rhetoric anddeliberate target<strong>in</strong>g of specific population groups <strong>in</strong> theSoviet Union, notably the "Great Russians, " Pentagon plans" for nuclear war. (p. 17) The rhetoricas opposed calls for the use of American nuclear weapons only <strong>in</strong>to members of other Republics. This approach, note retaliation for an enemy attack, but the actual plansthe authors, was advocated by key advisors to the <strong>in</strong>volve the capacity for a pre-emptive, first strike withCarter and Reagan adm<strong>in</strong>istrations. Cattell and Quester U. S. nuclear weapons. Ford also exposes the tendencyassert that the employment of such a target<strong>in</strong>g schemewould constitute "genocide. " of presidents to be quite ignorant of the nuclear(p. 281)weapons and war plans for which they are responsibleas Commander <strong>in</strong> Chief of all U. S. military forces.* 7. 60 *(p. 89-90) And he critically exam<strong>in</strong>es the "technologicalBundy, McGeorge. Danger and Survival: Choices illiteracy" of senior military officers responsible forAbout the Bomb <strong>in</strong> the First Fifty Years. New York: nuclear weapons: "The military commanders' lack ofRandom House, 1988. LC 88-42824. ISBN 0-394- knowledge about the new technology at their disposal52278-8.makes it very difficult for them to make sensibleA well-<strong>in</strong>formed former presidential advisor relates choices. ... " (p. 186)the history of the nuclear age, from the decisions tobuild and then use the first atomic bombs to the present + 7. 63 *period. Bundy not only exam<strong>in</strong>es key actions hy the Gay, William C. , and Michael Pearson. 1he NuclearUnited States and the Soviet Union, but also explores Arms Race. Chicago and London: The Americanwhy other nations, like Great Brita<strong>in</strong> and Israel, decided Library Association, 1987. LC 86-32087. ISBN 0-to acquire their own nuclear weapons.8389-0467-X.The authors have written excellent essays on the~ 7. 61 ~history of the arms race, consequences of nuclear war,Carter, Ashton, John D. Ste<strong>in</strong>hrunner, and Charles A. and alternatives to present policies. They have providedZraket, eds. Manag<strong>in</strong>g Nuclear Operations. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton,DC: Brook<strong>in</strong>gs, 1986. LC 86-32655. ISBN '0-annotated bibliographies on a wide range of issues, andappended a helpful section on how to obta<strong>in</strong> additional8157-131-4 pa.<strong>in</strong>formation. Their chapter on "The Probability ofLike 7. 59, this startl<strong>in</strong>g book goes beyond the Nuclear War" is particularly noteworthy.verbiage and rhetoric of much of the writ<strong>in</strong>g on nuclearstrategy to focus on details about actual arrangements * 7. 64 *for the weapons, both dur<strong>in</strong>g peace and <strong>in</strong> the event Gay, William C. , and Ronald E. Santoni. "Philosophyof war. The editors, <strong>in</strong> their <strong>in</strong>troduction, assert that and Contemporary Faces of <strong>Genocide</strong>: Multiple"All the widely accepted notions about the role of <strong>Genocide</strong> and Nuclear Destruction. " In <strong>Genocide</strong>: Anuclear weapons <strong>in</strong> security make strong, but frequently Critical Bibliographic Review. V. I. Ed. by Israel W.tacit and sometimes unjustified, assumptions about the Charny. London: Mansell and New York: Facts onability of the command system to manage nuclearweapons. " File, 1988. ISBN 0-7201-186-X (Mansell).(p. 2) Indeed, an important theme runn<strong>in</strong>gThe authors beg<strong>in</strong> this essay on the philosophicalthrough the hook is the doubtful ability of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g dimensions of mass kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the nuclear age by not<strong>in</strong>gcontrol over nuclear weapons <strong>in</strong> the event that a nuclear that "For the first time <strong>in</strong> human history, the issue ofwar breaks out. The titles of some of the chapters give whether or not human be<strong>in</strong>gs possess the capacity toan idea of the array of issues that are exam<strong>in</strong>ed:"Alert<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Crisis and Conventional War, " destroy all life on the planet Earth is he<strong>in</strong>g debated. ""War"(p. 172) They then exam<strong>in</strong>e a number of topics,Term<strong>in</strong>ation, "Delegation of Nuclear Command <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the possibility"of human ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> a"Authority, "Target<strong>in</strong>g, "The Psychological Climate nuclear holocaust and traditional moral criteriaof Nuclear"forCommand, and "Sources of Error and so-called "just-wars. " The"essay is followed by anUncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. See also 7. 62. excellent annotated bibliography that will be useful to140 GENOCIDE
anyone, not just philosophers, seriously concernedabout the nuclear threat.~ 7. 65 ~Halper<strong>in</strong>, Morton. ?he Nuclear Fallacy: Dispell<strong>in</strong>g theMyth of Nuclear Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Ball<strong>in</strong>gerPublish<strong>in</strong>g Co. , 1987. LC 86-32255. ISBN 0-88730-114-2.A former deputy assistant secretary of defense haswritten a strong critique of past and present U. S.policies on nuclear weapons. Halper<strong>in</strong> identifies whathe sees as many fallacies <strong>in</strong> recent strategic th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gand suggests that the most important fallacy is thetendency to th<strong>in</strong>k of "nuclear explosive devices" asweapons that can actually be used <strong>in</strong> war.~ 7. 66 ~Hark<strong>in</strong>, Tom, with C. E. Thomas. Five M<strong>in</strong>utes toMidnight: Why the Nuclear Threat Is Grow<strong>in</strong>g Faster?ban Ever. New York: Birch Lane Press — CarolPublish<strong>in</strong>g Group, 1990. LC 90-19405. ISBN 1-5597-042-5.Although the recent improvement <strong>in</strong> U. S. -Sovietrelations and the presumed end of the Cold War mayhave <strong>in</strong>duced some observers to dismiss the nuclearthreat to a low priority concern, these authors, thesenior of whom is a Democratic U. S. Senator fromIowa, argue persuasively that the danger posed bynuclear weapons is still all too real and urgent. In theirchapter, "The Grow<strong>in</strong>g Threat of" Nuclear War, Hark<strong>in</strong>and Thomas expose the cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g dangers posed bythe spread of nuclear weapons to additional nations.In addition to sound<strong>in</strong>g a warn<strong>in</strong>g, they also <strong>in</strong>cludeseveral provocative chapters <strong>in</strong> a section titled "AlternativeNational Security Strategies. " See. also 7. 80.+ 7. 67 ~Herken, Gregg. Counsels of War. Expanded ed. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1987. LC 86-31296.ISBN 0-19-504986-1.Herken conducted <strong>in</strong>terviews with dozens of keypolicymakers and delved through many primary andsecondary documents <strong>in</strong> order to create this reveal<strong>in</strong>g,and frequently disturb<strong>in</strong>g, historical study. Like Ford<strong>in</strong> 7. 62, he exposes the fact that, while our leaders havestated publicly that American nuclear weapons wouldbe used only <strong>in</strong> retaliation for a nuclear attack aga<strong>in</strong>stus, the actual war plans have called for U. S. tirststrikes. Herken also documentsthe role of "<strong>in</strong>ter-ser-vice rivalry, " where the several branches of the U. S.military forces compete for shares of the defense budgetand for new weapons technologies, <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g thenuclear arms race forward.* 7. 68 *Kaku, Michio, and Daniel Axelrod. To W<strong>in</strong> a NuclearWar: The Pentagon 's Secret War Plans. Boston: SouthEnd Press, 1987. LC 86-. 27974. ISBN 0-89608-321-7pa.Recently declassifed Pentagon documents, manyobta<strong>in</strong>ed through the Freedom of Information Act, arethe basis of the authors' exam<strong>in</strong>ation of secret U. S.nuclear plans from 1945 through the mid-1980s. Kakuand Axelrod assert that "These secret documentsdemonstrate <strong>in</strong> detail that, contrary to public statementsand widespread popular belief, <strong>in</strong> periods of crisis thePentagon has <strong>in</strong>deed threatened the use of nuclearweapons aga<strong>in</strong>st Third World nations and has seriouslyconsidered launch<strong>in</strong>g a first strike aga<strong>in</strong>st the SovietUnion. " (p. 3)*7. 69 ~Kaplan, Fred. 1he Wt'zards of Armageddon. New York:Simon & Schuster, 1983. LC 83-369. ISBN 0-671-42444-0.This is perhaps the best s<strong>in</strong>gle historical narrativeof the development of American nuclear weapons policyfrom the end of World War II through the early 1980s.In-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews with dozens of key figures, rang<strong>in</strong>gfrom former secretaries of defense through retiredgenerals to still-active nuclear policymakers, enabledKaplan to produce a fasc<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>timate portrait ofthe key <strong>in</strong>dividuals and organizations responsible fornuclear war plans that reads almost like a novel. Ofparticular note is his account of the cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong>personnel and philosophy between the firebomb<strong>in</strong>g ofJapanese cities dur<strong>in</strong>g World War II and early post-waratomic warfare policy. (p. 33-50) Kaplan also revealshow the ostensibly "scientific" basis of nuclear policymak<strong>in</strong>g often masks personal bias and organizational<strong>in</strong>terests; for example, claims that the United Stateswas dangerously beh<strong>in</strong>d the Soviet Union with respectto bombers and missiles, the so-called "bomber gap"of the 1950s and "missile gap" of the 1960s, respectively,were based on demonstrably weak and even deliberatelydistorted evidence, but led nonetheless to <strong>in</strong>creases<strong>in</strong> defense spend<strong>in</strong>g and nuclear weapon deployments.(p. 155-173)*7. 70 ~Kolkowicz, Roman, ed. The Logic of Nuclear Terror.Boston: Allen & Unw<strong>in</strong>, 1986. LC 86-22317. ISBN0-04-497032-3 pa.Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last few years, there has been aplethora of books published on the subject of nucleardeterrence. This is one of the very best. Kolkowicz,<strong>in</strong> a chapter titled "Intellectuals and the DeterrenceSystem, " traces the evolution of a new academicspeciality, "nuclear strategists, " which purported to be<strong>Genocide</strong> and Modern War 141
- Page 1 and 2:
GenocldeIn OurTlme- ,*"f* *An Annot
- Page 3:
DEDICATIONTo Raphael Lemkin(1901-19
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 5:The Armenian Genocide: Re
- Page 8 and 9:
Appendix 167Appendix: Chronology of
- Page 10 and 11:
ending sources of joy and hope. In
- Page 12 and 13:
Massive human suffering caused by p
- Page 14 and 15:
world without any reification and u
- Page 16 and 17:
CIIAPTER IETHNOCIDEby Alison Palmer
- Page 18 and 19:
als are tempted away by the promise
- Page 20 and 21:
Interactionsof Ethnocide and Genoci
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 1: AnnotatedBibliographyRea
- Page 24 and 25:
the inevitable extinction of tribal
- Page 26 and 27:
upon the purge of cultural and scie
- Page 28 and 29:
traditional ethnic and socio-cultur
- Page 30 and 31:
whites. Lizot proposes that integra
- Page 32 and 33:
¹ 1. 53 ¹Olson, James S. , and Ra
- Page 34 and 35:
tion of indigenes into state politi
- Page 36 and 37:
as a potential irredentist national
- Page 38 and 39:
serious questions about the notion
- Page 40 and 41:
ate and beleaguered institutions th
- Page 42 and 43:
In one of the most important works
- Page 44 and 45:
focusing on children, the most vuln
- Page 46 and 47:
~ 2. 35 ~Sereny, Gita. Into That Da
- Page 48 and 49:
were less than 200 Jewish survivors
- Page 50 and 51:
~ 2. 68 ~Nomberg-Przytyk, Sara. Aus
- Page 52 and 53:
of the war. The movement was known
- Page 54 and 55:
~ 2. 103 ~Wyman, David S. The Aband
- Page 56 and 57:
* 2. 122 ~Wiesenthal, Simon. The Su
- Page 58 and 59:
and Christianity. He argues that it
- Page 60 and 61:
Chapter 3THE ISSUE OF THE HOLOCAUST
- Page 62 and 63:
if we are to escape the mystificati
- Page 64 and 65:
outside the normal dimensions of ou
- Page 66 and 67:
historical event. All transformatio
- Page 68 and 69:
32. For an excellent understanding
- Page 70 and 71:
3 7Berenbaum, Michael. "The Uniquen
- Page 72 and 73:
Holocaust, a meaning with which we
- Page 74 and 75:
the Nazi exterminating drive, a pos
- Page 76 and 77:
framework, Marrus accepts the Holoc
- Page 78 and 79:
as "the cement of Jewish identity,
- Page 80 and 81:
'cry and you cry alone. ' So we kep
- Page 82 and 83:
of the body, combined with so many
- Page 84 and 85:
10. Lawrence Langer, Versions of Su
- Page 86 and 87:
~ 4. 10 ~Sichrovsky, Peter. Born Gu
- Page 88 and 89:
Appendix: The Diaryby Agi Rubinwith
- Page 90 and 91:
ella story. We could have eaten all
- Page 92 and 93:
which hardly anybody remains? Who k
- Page 94 and 95:
find a wise one who will solve it.
- Page 96 and 97:
Chapter 5THE ARMENIANGENOCIDE:REVIS
- Page 98 and 99:
The genocide was the culmination of
- Page 100 and 101: Abdications and Retributions Turkey
- Page 102 and 103: scene. They primarily targeted the
- Page 104 and 105: Turkish and non-Turkish apologists
- Page 106 and 107: and London: University Press of New
- Page 108 and 109: supporters of Armenian independence
- Page 110 and 111: that the history of the Armenians c
- Page 112 and 113: Realities Based on Ottoman Document
- Page 114 and 115: designed to falsely accuse Ottoman
- Page 116 and 117: and Western gullibility and predile
- Page 118 and 119: ambition to retain as much of Russi
- Page 120 and 121: Terror-FamineMemoir literature and
- Page 122 and 123: independence and viability of the U
- Page 124 and 125: So many members of the All-Ukraine
- Page 126 and 127: ~ 6. 26 ~Heller, Mikhail, and Aleks
- Page 128 and 129: ousness of the present one. In his
- Page 130 and 131: of structured social inequality, cr
- Page 132 and 133: or religious group, as such. "" The
- Page 134 and 135: and the general degradation of publ
- Page 136 and 137: easier by the fact that those who'd
- Page 138 and 139: 26. William Safire, "Object: Surviv
- Page 140 and 141: 74. Quoted in Paul Walker and Eric
- Page 142 and 143: es: People in the Machines of Death
- Page 144 and 145: ¹ 7. 16 ¹Dadrian, Vahakn N. "A Th
- Page 146 and 147: Corporate Enterprise at Auschwitz"
- Page 148 and 149: * 7. 47 +Nolan, Janne E. , and Albe
- Page 152 and 153: able to evaluate various nuclear we
- Page 154 and 155: In an angry, stimulating book, Aske
- Page 156 and 157: Lang reflects on how technology fac
- Page 158 and 159: This is a pioneering collection of
- Page 160 and 161: "good reasons" for not offering the
- Page 162 and 163: take consistent ethical actions aga
- Page 164 and 165: sadisChart: Taking a Stand Against
- Page 166 and 167: This indicator refers to an advance
- Page 168 and 169: 14. Louis Rene Beres, "Genocide, St
- Page 170 and 171: to horrible new acts of violence ag
- Page 172 and 173: * 8. 27 ~Horowitz, Irving Louis. Ge
- Page 174 and 175: ~ 8. 41 ~Lifton, Robert J. , and Er
- Page 176 and 177: ~ 8. 56 ~Thompson, John L. P. "Geno
- Page 178 and 179: CountryDatesPer petratorsVictimsEst
- Page 180 and 181: Dwork, DeborahDyer, Gwynne. . . . .
- Page 182 and 183: Morgenthau, Henry . . . . . '. . .
- Page 184 and 185: TITLE INDEXThe Abandonment of the J
- Page 186 and 187: "Epilogue: The Nuclear Arms Raceand
- Page 188 and 189: The Industrialization of Soviet Rus
- Page 190 and 191: Psychiatric Aspects of the Preventi
- Page 192: When Memory ComesWhile Six Million