26.08.2015 Views

OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE AND CURTILAGE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008–2013

Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013 - Museum of Australian ...

Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013 - Museum of Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Condition of Values<br />

Part D – Appendices<br />

Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan <strong>2008–2013</strong><br />

359<br />

Table 1. Assessment of condition and integrity - Fabric<br />

No. Embodiment of significance Condition (Source) Integrity<br />

53. adjacent Senate and House of<br />

Representatives gardens (NHL D)<br />

54. crisp lines, stark white colour,<br />

pronounced vertical patterns and<br />

classical form (NHL E: CHL E)<br />

55. landmark importance<br />

(NHL E: CHL A)<br />

56. viewpoint towards the Australian<br />

War Memorial and in the other<br />

direction to the Australian<br />

Parliament House (NHL E)<br />

57. visual relationship with Parliament<br />

House in the north-south vista,<br />

and the open landscape between<br />

the building and the lake (CHL E)<br />

58. Old Parliament House as an<br />

integral feature of the Land Axis<br />

vista to Parliament (NHL F)<br />

Good - although outside<br />

OPH management<br />

Fair (DCITA 2004, Taylor<br />

Thomson Whitting 2005)<br />

Fair (DCITA 2004, Taylor<br />

Thomson Whitting 2005)<br />

Good<br />

Good<br />

Good<br />

High - though this assessment<br />

relates to the physical relationship<br />

between the building and the<br />

gardens rather than an assessment<br />

of the gardens themselves<br />

High<br />

High<br />

High - although these views<br />

may be affected in future by<br />

planting within the land axis<br />

(eg Reconciliation Place),<br />

and carparking on the lawns<br />

south of OPH does detract<br />

High - although these views<br />

may be affected in future by<br />

planting within the land axis<br />

(eg Reconciliation Place),<br />

and carparking on the lawns<br />

south of OPH does detract<br />

High - although these views<br />

may be affected in future by<br />

planting within the land axis<br />

(eg Reconciliation Place)<br />

59. siting on the Land Axis (CHL E, G) Good High - although these views<br />

may be affected in future by<br />

planting within the land axis<br />

(eg Reconciliation Place)<br />

60. strict separation of principal<br />

components of parliamentary<br />

government, the legislative,<br />

executive and judicial, and<br />

the hierarchical relationship<br />

between them (NHL F)<br />

61. modest scale and aesthetic<br />

qualities, and the open<br />

landscaping and gardens between<br />

the building and the lake (NHL F)<br />

62. Specific rooms and spaces<br />

within the building are directly<br />

associated with events that<br />

shaped the political and private<br />

lives of prominent individuals<br />

in Australia’s political and<br />

social history (NHL G)<br />

Fair<br />

Good<br />

Fair (DCITA 2004, Taylor<br />

Thomson Whitting 2005)<br />

- general assessment<br />

only not related to<br />

specific rooms<br />

High - although the National<br />

Heritage values incorrectly<br />

characterise the legislature and<br />

executive as being separate,<br />

which they were not in OPH<br />

High - although the scale of<br />

some plantings may erode<br />

this quality in future<br />

Medium<br />

63. fitout (CHL D) Good (DCITA 2004) Medium<br />

64. plain yet dignified design (CHL F) Fair (DCITA 2004, Taylor<br />

Thomson Whitting 2005)<br />

High

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!