26.08.2015 Views

OLD PARLIAMENT HOUSE AND CURTILAGE HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2008–2013

Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013 - Museum of Australian ...

Heritage Management Plan 2008-2013 - Museum of Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Heritage Values<br />

Part A – Context<br />

38 Old Parliament House and Curtilage Heritage Management Plan <strong>2008–2013</strong><br />

Risk analysis<br />

Background<br />

An analysis of the implications of the risks to the<br />

heritage values at Old Parliament House was<br />

undertaken as an important early step in the<br />

development of the Heritage Management Plan.<br />

Consultation was undertaken with a range of<br />

internal stakeholders. The views gathered provide<br />

different perspectives on the interaction of heritage<br />

management, maintenance and works and the<br />

promotional needs of the place. These views are<br />

synthesised in the Heritage Management Plan.<br />

All of the heritage values embodied at Old Parliament<br />

House were considered in the risk analysis, including<br />

both the values represented in the physical form and<br />

fabric of the place, and the values embodied in a less<br />

tangible sense, such as the building’s symbolic status.<br />

A risk matrix was developed for each of the National<br />

Heritage values, with the criteria for identifying the<br />

likelihood of each risk provided, together with ratings<br />

of the possible consequences (see Appendix H for risk<br />

matrix and full risk analysis). It is noteworthy that the<br />

risks identified for Old Parliament House tended to<br />

fall within an area of the matrix suggesting a generally<br />

moderate likelihood of risks occurring but a potential<br />

for extremely serious consequences should the risks be<br />

realised. This reflects the outstanding heritage values<br />

of Old Parliament House.<br />

The purpose of the analysis was to identify the<br />

constraints operating at Old Parliament House with<br />

respect to effective conservation as well as those<br />

relating to possible future uses. By identifying the<br />

principal threats it was intended that Old Parliament<br />

House management could adopt proactive decisionmaking<br />

procedures that anticipated threats to heritage,<br />

rather than responding to them after the event.<br />

The process of identifying the risks also had the effect<br />

of stimulating ideas in relation to future opportunities<br />

for Old Parliament House management to pursue in<br />

relation to the appropriate management of the place’s<br />

heritage values.<br />

Summary of identified risks<br />

The risks to the identified values at Old Parliament<br />

House generally fall into two categories:<br />

• risks to the fabric and form of the place<br />

• risks to the less tangible values of the place.<br />

The effects of risks to the fabric and form of the place<br />

tend to be measurable. They also tend to be the<br />

risks that are more readily identifiable in advance and<br />

therefore can be prevented. Examples of these risks<br />

include:<br />

• fire, flood, theft, vandalism, natural disaster, terrorist<br />

attack etc<br />

• inappropriate conservation work resulting in damage<br />

to heritage fabric<br />

• inappropriate physical intervention (such as<br />

demolition or unsympathetic addition) of parts of<br />

Old Parliament House<br />

• inappropriate use and/or inappropriate maintenance<br />

resulting in damage to heritage fabric<br />

• the slow erosion of values through incremental<br />

change, culminating in major impacts on the place<br />

• declining budgets and resources resulting in reduced<br />

and/or inadequate maintenance and monitoring.<br />

The second category of risks relates principally to the<br />

less tangible values of Old Parliament House, and the<br />

need to ensure its ongoing use and the interpretation<br />

of its values to a wide audience. The risks identified in<br />

this regard include:<br />

• a change of use to all or part of the place, or the<br />

carrying out of inappropriate activities (including<br />

inappropriate promotions) that results in a diminution<br />

of the symbolic values of Old Parliament House or a<br />

reduction in public access<br />

• the failure to appropriately tell the stories of the place<br />

through ill-informed or ineffective interpretation<br />

• the disengagement of important stakeholders (such<br />

as government and the public) from<br />

Old Parliament House as a result of failing to<br />

effectively communicate the place’s heritage values<br />

or through inadequate consultation<br />

• the reduction of Old Parliament House to a sterile<br />

and uninteresting environment rather than an active,<br />

living and engaging heritage place<br />

• a privileging of some phases of the place’s history<br />

over others as a result of a failure to appreciate its<br />

multi-layered heritage values<br />

• a loss of important relationships between spaces,<br />

objects and people as a result of a failure to properly<br />

appreciate the significant associations at<br />

Old Parliament House.<br />

Reconstructed Country Party Room<br />

Photographer: Auspic<br />

Source: Old Parliament House Collection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!