07.02.2017 Views

people and planet

2kNmCFZ

2kNmCFZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

motorized transport (Clean Air Asia, 2013). Educational<br />

tools have been important in the mass adoption of two<br />

forms of more sustainable transport: bus rapid transit<br />

(Box 5.2) <strong>and</strong> cycling (Box 5.3).<br />

EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE<br />

CAN CONTRIBUTE TO<br />

INEQUALITY IN CITIES<br />

Education is not invariably a positive influence in urban<br />

areas. It can both embody <strong>and</strong> reflect existing inequity,<br />

<strong>and</strong> can contribute to or cause inequality. Knowledgedriven<br />

economic development has been a factor in rising<br />

inequality <strong>and</strong> vanishing middle skill jobs (see Chapter 2:<br />

Prosperity). To ensure that education does not exacerbate<br />

unequal patterns of social stratification, governments<br />

need to acknowledge the relationship between education<br />

<strong>and</strong> inequality, <strong>and</strong> balance education-related activities<br />

that can improve the competitiveness of a city with<br />

those that can improve social inclusion.<br />

BOX 5.2<br />

Education for awareness <strong>and</strong> consensus-building has been<br />

important for smooth adoption of bus rapid transit systems<br />

Bus rapid transit (BRT) is a high capacity mass transit system with features such<br />

as dedicated bus lanes <strong>and</strong> off-board fare collection, which improve efficiency <strong>and</strong><br />

reduce traffic congestion. The BRT model is a key component of the concept of global<br />

sustainable urban mobility. Two hundred <strong>and</strong> three cities around the world have BRT<br />

systems, partly due to advocacy by mayors.<br />

Experience with BRT systems shows that information <strong>and</strong> communication strategies<br />

are especially important to engage stakeholders who may be adversely affected by<br />

introduction of the system, such as other transit operators <strong>and</strong> private vehicle users.<br />

In Johannesburg, South Africa, inadequate communication among stakeholders (local<br />

government <strong>and</strong> two private taxi organizations) at an early stage of the discussion led to<br />

lack of trust among parties, severely delaying implementation of the system. By contrast,<br />

in Lagos, Nigeria, local government engaged stakeholders in a communication programme<br />

from the beginning, including in planning <strong>and</strong> implementation. This helped Lagos avoid<br />

deadlock with stakeholders <strong>and</strong> the project was implemented relatively quickly.<br />

Sources: Allen (2013); EMBARQ (2015); Kumar et al. (2012).<br />

INEQUALITY IN EDUCATION IS RELATED TO<br />

LOCATION, WEALTH AND OTHER FACTORS<br />

Location <strong>and</strong> wealth<br />

There is substantial inequality in education between rural<br />

<strong>and</strong> urban areas (see Chapter 3: People). In-depth data<br />

also suggest strong intra-urban inequality. According to<br />

GEM Report team calculations, while urban areas often<br />

provide greater access to education, the urban poor have<br />

worse primary completion rates than the average rural<br />

household in 26 out of the 35 countries with available<br />

data. In the case of lower secondary completion rates,<br />

which entail a more select group of households <strong>and</strong><br />

students, the urban poor disadvantage is even more<br />

pronounced: Outcomes among the urban poor are much<br />

worse than those of the rural poor in many lower income<br />

countries. This is likely attributable to factors such as<br />

the opportunity cost of forgoing paid employment <strong>and</strong><br />

difficulty affording education (Figure 5.2).<br />

Thus, the potential positive benefits of being located in<br />

an urban area can be undermined by a lack of policies<br />

that address inequity.<br />

Various spatial <strong>and</strong> social patterns in most major cities –<br />

gentrification, slums, urban sprawl, housing discrimination,<br />

immigrant enclaves – separate residents in terms of<br />

wealth, access <strong>and</strong> privilege (UN Habitat, 2009a). These<br />

BOX 5.3<br />

Education is a critical component of making cycling the norm<br />

in urban transport<br />

In countries with best-practice cities, such as Denmark, Germany <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

cycling became the norm for transport as a result of both urban planning <strong>and</strong> education,<br />

with right of way for cyclists, bike parking, comprehensive traffic education <strong>and</strong> training for<br />

cyclists <strong>and</strong> motorists, <strong>and</strong> a range of promotional events to generate support. Education<br />

is woven into an integrated approach in which Danish, Dutch <strong>and</strong> German children from<br />

an early age receive extensive training in safe <strong>and</strong> effective cycling – in classrooms <strong>and</strong><br />

on the road – as part of their curriculum by the fourth grade. Police officers test children,<br />

who receive official certificates <strong>and</strong> stickers for their bikes once they pass the test.<br />

Starting early ensures that children begin cycling when they are young. A<br />

comprehensive approach provides greater impact than individual, uncoordinated<br />

measures. Policies also de-incentivized driving through taxes <strong>and</strong> restrictions on car<br />

ownership <strong>and</strong> use, while education shifted public opinion in favour of walking, cycling<br />

<strong>and</strong> public transport in reaction to the negative impact of car use.<br />

Paris’s bike-sharing or ‘public bicycle’ system, Vélib, has reduced traffic in private<br />

vehicles <strong>and</strong> increased daily bicycle trips enormously. Similar systems have been<br />

adopted in over 50 countries <strong>and</strong> over 700 cities. Education is important to promote<br />

public underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> frequent use of such systems. Bike-sharing programmes<br />

are being widely adopted in Latin American cities, including Buenos Aires, Mexico City<br />

<strong>and</strong> Rio de Janeiro.<br />

Sources: Ferreiro (2015); Godefrooij et al. (2009); Pucher et al. (2010); Pucher <strong>and</strong> Buehler (2008).<br />

2016 • GLOBAL EDUCATION MONITORING REPORT 121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!