07.02.2017 Views

people and planet

2kNmCFZ

2kNmCFZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5<br />

Statistical tables 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

FROM EDUCATION FOR ALL TO THE<br />

EDUCATION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT<br />

GOAL: NEW AGENDA, NEW STATISTICAL TABLES<br />

With the adoption in September 2015 of the 2030<br />

Agenda for Sustainable Development – which sets new<br />

development priorities, including for education through<br />

the fourth Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 4) – <strong>and</strong>,<br />

in November 2015, of the Education 2030 Framework<br />

for Action at the 38th session of the UNESCO General<br />

Conference, the Education for All (EFA) cycle came to an<br />

end. With this edition of the Global Education Monitoring<br />

Report (GEM Report), the statistical tables are evolving to<br />

reflect the new education agenda.<br />

The tables have been reorganized to reflect <strong>and</strong> align<br />

with (a) the aspirational nature <strong>and</strong> great ambition of<br />

the Education 2030 agenda, which has at its core equity<br />

<strong>and</strong> inclusion <strong>and</strong> embraces a lifelong perspective; (b) the<br />

seven SDG 4 targets <strong>and</strong> three means of implementation,<br />

which are not only about access to, participation in <strong>and</strong><br />

completion of education, but also have education quality<br />

at their core in terms of inputs, outputs, processes,<br />

learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> environments, <strong>and</strong> the skills<br />

youth <strong>and</strong> adults must be equipped with for decent<br />

work; <strong>and</strong> (c) a broad set of 43 internationally comparable<br />

thematic indicators, of which 11 are global indicators. 2<br />

Consequently, the statistical tables of the GEM Report<br />

aim to be more comprehensive than in earlier reports,<br />

while reflecting significant limitations in terms of data<br />

availability <strong>and</strong> country coverage, particularly regarding<br />

some indicators that still need to be defined <strong>and</strong><br />

developed. Accordingly, placeholders or proxy indicators<br />

are occasionally used. These statistical tables contain<br />

more indicators than in earlier reports, particularly<br />

on education quality, learning outcomes, youth <strong>and</strong><br />

adult skills (including not only literacy <strong>and</strong> numeracy<br />

but also information <strong>and</strong> communications technology<br />

skills) <strong>and</strong> tertiary education. While aligned with the<br />

proposed thematic <strong>and</strong> global indicators, the statistical<br />

tables include additional indicators – such as repetition,<br />

dropout, <strong>and</strong> transition from primary to secondary<br />

education <strong>and</strong> from secondary to tertiary – which remain<br />

critical but were left out of the new indicator set.<br />

In addition to administrative data provided to the UIS<br />

by education ministries worldwide, the statistical tables<br />

rely on data from other sources, including national,<br />

regional <strong>and</strong> international learning assessments;<br />

national <strong>and</strong> international household surveys, such as<br />

the Demographic <strong>and</strong> Health Surveys <strong>and</strong> UNICEF’s<br />

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys; <strong>and</strong> bodies including<br />

the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS<br />

(UNAIDS), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation<br />

<strong>and</strong> Development (OECD), UNICEF, the United Nations<br />

Population Division (UNPD), the World Bank <strong>and</strong> the<br />

World Health Organization (WHO).<br />

The new statistical tables are organized by targets <strong>and</strong><br />

means of implementation instead of by education level<br />

(from pre-primary to tertiary) as was formerly the case;<br />

this results in some seeming anomalies, such as early<br />

childhood care <strong>and</strong> education coming after primary <strong>and</strong><br />

secondary education. As in the past, the tables include<br />

domestic education finance, which, though absent from<br />

the SDG 4 targets, is a key means of implementation<br />

<strong>and</strong> an enabling factor to achieve the targets. Because of<br />

the comprehensiveness of the new statistical tables <strong>and</strong><br />

the size constraints of the GEM Report, they continue<br />

2016 • GLOBAL EDUCATION MONITORING REPORT 393

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!