07.02.2017 Views

people and planet

2kNmCFZ

2kNmCFZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

from India suggests that formal education for Dalit<br />

populations has not led to commensurate increases<br />

in life chances, due to severe economic discrimination<br />

(Thorat <strong>and</strong> Neuman, 2007). In a range of countries in<br />

Eastern <strong>and</strong> South-eastern Asia, Europe, Latin America<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Caribbean, the Pacific <strong>and</strong> Southern Asia, there<br />

is consistent evidence of discrimination based on race<br />

or ethnicity affecting <strong>people</strong>’s labour market outcomes<br />

(Bertr<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Duflo, 2016).<br />

WHO ARE THE MOST MARGINALIZED<br />

IN EDUCATION?<br />

The discussion above outlines the scale of the challenge<br />

to provide universal services, achieve gender equality<br />

<strong>and</strong> address discrimination against marginalized groups.<br />

This section describes marginalization in education,<br />

identifies the most marginalized groups, defines barriers<br />

to inclusive social development <strong>and</strong> shows who must be<br />

reached to achieve it.<br />

Access to education is a powerful means of<br />

mitigating disadvantage, ending poverty <strong>and</strong><br />

reducing inequality, which are core goals of the SDG<br />

agenda. However, many overlapping disadvantages<br />

limit education outcomes as a result of serious<br />

marginalization <strong>and</strong> inequality (UNESCO, 2010). As<br />

the Education for All Global Monitoring Reports (GMRs)<br />

point out, the groups most marginalized in terms of<br />

education access <strong>and</strong> quality vary substantially; they<br />

include racial, ethnic <strong>and</strong> linguistic minorities, <strong>people</strong><br />

with disabilities, pastoralists, slum dwellers, children<br />

with HIV, ‘unregistered’ children, <strong>and</strong> orphans (UNESCO,<br />

2010, 2015). Improved data <strong>and</strong> monitoring efforts are<br />

needed to better identify marginalized children, youth<br />

<strong>and</strong> adults <strong>and</strong> to develop policy solutions to combat<br />

marginalization (see Chapter 14: Equity).<br />

Universal access to primary <strong>and</strong> secondary education<br />

implies leaving no one behind, including members of<br />

marginalized groups (see<br />

Chapter 10). In the school<br />

year ending in 2014,<br />

In 2014, nearly 61<br />

nearly 61 million children<br />

million children of of primary school age <strong>and</strong><br />

primary school age 202 million adolescents<br />

of secondary school<br />

<strong>and</strong> 202 million<br />

age were out of school.<br />

adolescents of<br />

In addition, country<br />

secondary school age commitments to halve<br />

adult illiteracy levels by<br />

were out of school<br />

2015 remain unfulfilled<br />

despite much progress.<br />

Worldwide, some 758 million adults, 63% of them women,<br />

have not attained even minimal literacy skills.<br />

Within countries <strong>and</strong> at all levels of development,<br />

education marginalization is most acute among<br />

disadvantaged subpopulations – distinguished typically<br />

by wealth, gender, ethnicity <strong>and</strong> migration status – who<br />

face persistently low educational opportunities <strong>and</strong><br />

poor quality provision. Even as countries make overall<br />

progress on various education outcomes, such groups<br />

are much more likely to be left behind.<br />

Poverty continues to be the largest determinant of<br />

education deprivation <strong>and</strong> inequality. For example, based<br />

on GEM Report team calculations, among youth aged<br />

20 to 24 in 101 low <strong>and</strong> middle income countries, those in<br />

the poorest quintile average 5 fewer years of schooling<br />

than those in the richest quintile, compared with a<br />

2.6 year difference between those from rural <strong>and</strong> urban<br />

locations, <strong>and</strong> a 1.1 year difference between females<br />

<strong>and</strong> males.<br />

However, different characteristics tend to overlap <strong>and</strong><br />

compound deprivation. For example, females from poor,<br />

ethnically or spatially marginalized backgrounds often<br />

fare substantially worse than their male counterparts,<br />

<strong>and</strong> gender gaps in disadvantaged groups may be larger<br />

than in more advantaged groups. In all aspects of lifelong<br />

learning – access <strong>and</strong> completion of formal education,<br />

post-school training <strong>and</strong> adult education – gender<br />

compounds disadvantages related to socio-economic<br />

status, ethnicity, location, religion, sexuality, disability,<br />

age <strong>and</strong> race (Kabeer, 2015). For example, the UN has<br />

identified poverty <strong>and</strong> location as the factors most<br />

likely to determine whether girls participate in school<br />

(UN Women, 2014). And in Latin America, illiteracy<br />

rates among indigenous women are often more than<br />

double those of non-indigenous women (Vinding <strong>and</strong><br />

Kampbel, 2012).<br />

Wide disparity in educational attainment is clearly<br />

evident where wealth <strong>and</strong> gender intersect. GEM<br />

Report team calculations show that in almost every<br />

country, but particularly those with low average<br />

educational attainment, youth in the richest quintile<br />

have substantially more years of education than those<br />

in the poorest quintile. Extreme disparity in attainment<br />

is found in countries including Nigeria <strong>and</strong> Pakistan,<br />

where the wealthiest quintiles have more than 8 years<br />

more than the poorest. Education disparity between rich<br />

<strong>and</strong> poor tends to decrease in richer countries, but often<br />

remains significant. In Argentina, an example of a high<br />

income country, the wealthiest have three more years<br />

2016 • GLOBAL EDUCATION MONITORING REPORT 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!