07.02.2017 Views

people and planet

2kNmCFZ

2kNmCFZ

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12<br />

operations, critical thinking <strong>and</strong> problem solving.<br />

Assessments are designed to measure either generic<br />

skills or those that reflect a body of knowledge within<br />

a given field.<br />

Few countries deliver national assessments of student<br />

cognitive skills. Brazil initiated the Exame Nacional<br />

de Desempenho dos Estudantes (ENADE) through<br />

legislation in 1996 <strong>and</strong> has administered it nationally<br />

since 2004. About 80% of students in public <strong>and</strong> private<br />

institutions take the exam as they enter <strong>and</strong> exit<br />

bachelor studies. Results across 19 fields of study show<br />

that students display more improvement in subjectspecific<br />

areas than in the general knowledge component<br />

of the test (Melguizo <strong>and</strong> Wainer, 2015).<br />

These findings suggest that the curriculum significantly<br />

influences learning, since the general skills portion<br />

of the test is not aligned with the curricula of the<br />

study programmes. Another reason for the difference<br />

is the knowledge level associated with generic skills<br />

assessment. For example, students in medicine show<br />

almost no general skills gains over four years but<br />

substantial content area gains, most likely because they<br />

enter university with high general academic abilities.<br />

Cross-national comparisons of higher education learning<br />

outcomes have also been attempted. OECD completed<br />

a feasibility study on Assessment of Higher Education<br />

Learning Outcomes (AHELO) in 2013 with participation<br />

from 17 countries <strong>and</strong> jurisdictions. China, Finl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Norway supported a full assessment, but the project met<br />

with resistance from governments or higher education<br />

leaders in Canada, the United Kingdom <strong>and</strong> the United<br />

States (Morgan, 2015).<br />

A project called Measuring <strong>and</strong> Comparing Achievements<br />

of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education in Europe<br />

(CALOHEE) was launched in 2015. Results from the first<br />

round of assessments are expected in 2017. The intent<br />

is to assess whether students across the European<br />

Higher Education Area are achieving competencies that<br />

match internationally defined st<strong>and</strong>ards. CALOHEE is<br />

a bottom-up, university-driven process, while ENADE<br />

<strong>and</strong> AHELO were driven by governments oriented<br />

towards accountability.<br />

Some critics have questioned whether tertiary education<br />

learning assessments in general are measuring what they<br />

claim to measure (Primi et al., 2010; 2011). Universities<br />

also question their purpose. Assessments of student<br />

outcomes have largely been developed to promote<br />

accountability <strong>and</strong> are designed by external bodies –<br />

government agencies, private testing companies <strong>and</strong><br />

non-profit groups (Nusche, 2008). Critics note the<br />

absence of faculty in design <strong>and</strong> implementation, a<br />

crucial weakness considering that tertiary faculty have<br />

a relatively high degree of autonomy as stewards of<br />

academic content (Possin, 2013).<br />

The methodological limitations <strong>and</strong> costs of student<br />

outcome assessments are cause for reflection.<br />

Differences in national policy structures <strong>and</strong> resources,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in university missions in the education system, pose<br />

considerable barriers to a meaningful global measure of<br />

quality in tertiary education.<br />

ADULT EDUCATION<br />

While SDG 4 calls for ensuring lifelong learning<br />

opportunities for all, none of the education targets<br />

explicitly mentions adult education. However, the<br />

proposed global indicator for target 4.3 incorporates<br />

the concept of adult education, <strong>and</strong> adult learning,<br />

education <strong>and</strong> training<br />

opportunities form a<br />

While SDG 4 calls<br />

strategy for achieving<br />

target 4.3, according<br />

for ensuring lifelong<br />

to the Education 2030<br />

learning opportunities<br />

Framework for Action.<br />

for all, none of the<br />

The three modes of<br />

education targets<br />

adult education are<br />

explicitly mentions<br />

formal, non-formal<br />

adult education<br />

<strong>and</strong> informal. Formal<br />

education refers mostly<br />

to initial education that<br />

is ‘institutionalized, intentional <strong>and</strong> planned through<br />

public organizations <strong>and</strong> recognized private bodies’ <strong>and</strong><br />

‘recognized as such by the relevant national education or<br />

equivalent authorities’ (UIS, 2012b).<br />

Non-formal education is ‘any organized, systematic,<br />

educational activity, carried on outside the framework<br />

of the formal system, to provide selected types of learning’.<br />

It takes distinct forms, including lectures, seminars <strong>and</strong><br />

workshops with established learning objectives <strong>and</strong><br />

content, tutoring <strong>and</strong> private lessons, on-the-job training,<br />

<strong>and</strong> open <strong>and</strong> distance learning. While the dominant reason<br />

236<br />

CHAPTER 12 | TARGET 4.3 – TECHNICAL, VOCATIONAL, TERTIARY AND ADULT EDUCATION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!