13.12.2012 Views

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

310<br />

thin surface layer. So brief was the duration <strong>of</strong> high<br />

temperatures that very little heat flowed in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

plate, and the researchers concluded that active cooling<br />

was unnecessary and that either aluminum or steel<br />

would be durable enough <strong>to</strong> serve as plate material.<br />

<strong>The</strong> situation was similar <strong>to</strong> that in an au<strong>to</strong>mobile<br />

engine, in which the peak combustion temperatures<br />

far exceed the melting points <strong>of</strong> the cylinders and pis<strong>to</strong>ns.<br />

<strong>The</strong> engine remains intact because the period <strong>of</strong><br />

peak temperature is short compared <strong>to</strong> the period <strong>of</strong><br />

the combustion cycle.<br />

Still, it was evident that some experimentation was<br />

needed, and so the Orion team built a series <strong>of</strong> models,<br />

called Put-Puts or Hot Rods, <strong>to</strong> test whether<br />

pusher plates made <strong>of</strong> aluminum could survive the<br />

momentary intense temperatures and pressures created<br />

by chemical explosives. Several models were<br />

destroyed, but a 100-m flight in November 1959, propelled<br />

by six charges, was successful and demonstrated<br />

that impulsive flight could be stable. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

experiments also suggested that the plate should be<br />

thick in the middle and taper <strong>to</strong>ward its edges for<br />

maximum strength with minimum weight.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was no obvious technical flaw in the Orion<br />

scheme or any argument <strong>to</strong> suggest that it could not<br />

be implemented economically. Its huge weakness,<br />

however, was that it depended upon a<strong>to</strong>mic explosions<br />

that would release potentially harmful radiation<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the environment—a fact that would ultimately be<br />

its undoing.<br />

Early on, Taylor and his team recognized that they<br />

would need substantial government funding. <strong>The</strong><br />

Advanced Research Projects Agency was approached<br />

in April 1958 and, in July, agreed <strong>to</strong> sponsor the project<br />

at an initial level <strong>of</strong> $1 million per year. However,<br />

this funding was short-lived. <strong>The</strong> newly formed<br />

NASA was beginning <strong>to</strong> acquire all civil-oriented<br />

space projects run by the federal government, while<br />

the Air Force was assuming control over space projects<br />

with military applications. Orion was initially<br />

excluded from both camps because the Air Force felt<br />

it had no value as a weapon, and NASA had made a<br />

strategic decision in 1959 that the civilian space program<br />

would, in the near future at any rate, be nonnuclear.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> NASA’s rocket engineers were<br />

specialists in chemical propulsion and either did not<br />

understand or were openly opposed <strong>to</strong> nuclear flight.<br />

Moreover, NASA did not want <strong>to</strong> attract public criticism<br />

by being seen <strong>to</strong> favor a<strong>to</strong>mic devices. Orion was<br />

ARPA’s only space interest, and in 1959 it decided it<br />

could no longer support the project on national security<br />

grounds.<br />

Taylor then approached the Air Force, which, after<br />

much persuasion, agreed <strong>to</strong> support Orion, providing<br />

that some military use could be found for it. However,<br />

Secretary <strong>of</strong> Defense Robert McNamara was<br />

unconvinced that Orion could become a military<br />

asset, and his department consistently rejected any<br />

increase in funding, effectively limiting it <strong>to</strong> a feasibility<br />

study. For the project <strong>to</strong> take <strong>of</strong>f literally, it was<br />

essential that NASA become involved, so Taylor and<br />

James Nance, a General A<strong>to</strong>mics employee and later<br />

direc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the Orion project, made representation <strong>to</strong><br />

Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). <strong>The</strong>y put forward<br />

a new design that called for the Orion vehicle <strong>to</strong><br />

be carried in<strong>to</strong> orbit as a Saturn V upper stage, the<br />

core <strong>of</strong> the spacecraft being a 90,000-kg “propulsion<br />

module” with a pusher-plate diameter <strong>of</strong> 10 m (limited<br />

by the diameter <strong>of</strong> the Saturn). This smaller<br />

design would restrict the specific impulse <strong>to</strong> between<br />

1,800 and 2,500 seconds—a figure that, though low by<br />

nuclear-pulse standards, still far exceeded those <strong>of</strong><br />

other nuclear rocket designs. <strong>The</strong> proposed shockabsorbing<br />

system had two sections: a primary unit<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>roidal pneumatic bags located directly<br />

behind the pusher plate, and a secondary unit <strong>of</strong> four<br />

telescoping shocks (like those on a car) connecting the<br />

pusher plate assembly <strong>to</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the spacecraft. At<br />

least two Saturn V launches would have been needed<br />

<strong>to</strong> put the components <strong>of</strong> the vehicle in<strong>to</strong> orbit. One<br />

<strong>of</strong> the missions suggested for this so-called firstgeneration<br />

Orion was a 125-day round-trip <strong>to</strong> Mars,<br />

involving eight astronauts and about 100 <strong>to</strong>ns <strong>of</strong><br />

equipment and supplies. A great advantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nuclear-pulse method is that it <strong>of</strong>fers so much energy<br />

that high-speed, low-fuel-economy routes become<br />

perfectly feasible.<br />

Wernher von Braun, at MSFC, became a supporter<br />

<strong>of</strong> Orion, but his superiors at NASA were not so<br />

enthusiastic, and the Office <strong>of</strong> Manned <strong>Spaceflight</strong><br />

was prepared only <strong>to</strong> fund another study. Serious concerns<br />

surrounded the safety <strong>of</strong> carrying hundreds <strong>of</strong><br />

a<strong>to</strong>mic bombs through Earth’s atmosphere. And<br />

there was worse news <strong>to</strong> come for the project. With<br />

the signing <strong>of</strong> the nuclear test-ban treaty by the<br />

United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union in<br />

August 1963, Orion, as a military-funded program<br />

calling for the explosion <strong>of</strong> nuclear devices, became<br />

illegal under international law. <strong>The</strong> only way it could<br />

be saved was <strong>to</strong> be reborn as a peaceful scientific

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!