13.12.2012 Views

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

378<br />

An experimental American space station adapted<br />

from <strong>Apollo</strong> hardware. Skylab consisted <strong>of</strong> the<br />

orbital workshop itself, an airlock module, a multiple<br />

docking adapter, and the <strong>Apollo</strong> telescope mount. In<br />

orbit, the station was 36 m long and, with a docked<br />

<strong>Apollo</strong> command and service module, had a mass <strong>of</strong><br />

about 90.6 <strong>to</strong>ns. <strong>The</strong> living volume was about the<br />

same as that <strong>of</strong> a small house. Because crews stayed<br />

for one, two, or three months, the orbital workshop<br />

was designed for habitability, with more amenities<br />

than previous spacecraft. Among the features especially<br />

appreciated by crews were a large window for<br />

viewing Earth, a galley and wardroom with a table for<br />

group meals, private sleeping quarters, and a shower,<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>m-designed for use in weightlessness.<br />

Twin solar array wing panels were folded against the<br />

orbital workshop for launch, one on each side. When<br />

Skylab reached orbit, the arrays would extend, exposing<br />

solar cells <strong>to</strong> the Sun <strong>to</strong> produce 12 kW <strong>of</strong> power.<br />

Skylab was equipped <strong>to</strong> observe Earth’s natural<br />

resources and the environment, and activity on the<br />

Sun. Astronauts also studied the effects <strong>of</strong> long-term<br />

weightlessness on the human body and materials processing<br />

in microgravity, and performed experiments<br />

submitted by students for a “Classroom in Space.”<br />

Because Skylab was a research labora<strong>to</strong>ry, the composition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crew differed from that <strong>of</strong> the Mercury,<br />

Gemini, and <strong>Apollo</strong> missions. Except for one scientist<br />

on the last <strong>Apollo</strong> mission, all previous crew members<br />

had been pilots. <strong>The</strong> Skylab crews included a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> scientist-astronauts.<br />

Skylab 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> unmanned mission <strong>to</strong> place Skylab in orbit. During<br />

launch, on May 14, 1975, the micrometeoroid<br />

shield accidentally deployed <strong>to</strong>o soon, jamming one<br />

solar array wing and damaging the other so badly that<br />

both the wing and the shield were ripped away. Left<br />

with only one solar array wing and no micrometeoroid<br />

shield, which also served as a shade <strong>to</strong> keep the<br />

interior <strong>of</strong> the space station cool, Skylab could have<br />

been rendered useless. However, thanks <strong>to</strong> clever engineering<br />

and improvisation, the effect <strong>of</strong> the damage<br />

was minimized, and planned Skylab operations were<br />

able <strong>to</strong> go ahead despite some reduction in power.<br />

Skylab<br />

Skylab 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> first manned Skylab mission, devoted <strong>to</strong> starting<br />

up and checking out the space station and, most<br />

importantly, fixing the damage caused during the station’s<br />

launch. With the temperature inside Skylab at a<br />

scorching 52°C, the astronauts’ first priority was <strong>to</strong> set<br />

up a “parasol” shade as a makeshift replacement for<br />

the lost micrometeoroid shield. Once this had been<br />

deployed by reaching out <strong>of</strong> Skylab’s main hatch, the<br />

temperature inside the station dropped <strong>to</strong> comfortable<br />

levels. On the third day <strong>of</strong> the mission (MD-3),<br />

the crew began turning on experiments. <strong>The</strong>n, on<br />

MD-14, Conrad and Kerwin went on a crucial threehour<br />

spacewalk <strong>to</strong> extend Skylab’s only remaining<br />

solar array wing, which was jammed by a strap <strong>of</strong><br />

debris. Kerwin was able <strong>to</strong> cut through the debris<br />

using <strong>of</strong>f-the-shelf barbed-wire snippers that NASA<br />

had bought for just $75. <strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> this repair<br />

ensured that there would be enough power for the full<br />

28-day mission and for the subsequent Skylab 3 and<br />

Skylab 4 missions. A couple <strong>of</strong> days before returning<br />

home, Conrad and Kerwin carried out another spacewalk<br />

<strong>to</strong> retrieve and replace film from the solar telescopes,<br />

repair a circuit breaker module, and do minor<br />

maintenance on experiment packages located outside<br />

the station. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the mission, the Skylab<br />

2 crew briefly set a new manned spaceflight<br />

endurance record, previously held by cosmonauts<br />

Dobrovolsky, Volkov, and Patsayev on Salyut 1 in<br />

June 1971.<br />

Launch: May 25, 1973<br />

Recovery: June 22, 1973<br />

Mission duration: 28 days<br />

Crew: Charles “Pete” Conrad Jr. (commander), Paul<br />

Weitz (pilot), Joseph Kerwin (science pilot)<br />

Skylab 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> second manned Skylab mission. Shortly after<br />

entering the space station, all three crew members fell<br />

victim <strong>to</strong> space-sickness, delaying the activation <strong>of</strong><br />

onboard equipment. On Mission Day-5, an apparent<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the four thruster quadrants on the<br />

Command and Service Module (CSM) was detected.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!