26.12.2012 Views

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

An international survey was carried out by field staff <strong>of</strong> the FAO, extension<br />

services, industry, and other organizations, using a questionnaire and<br />

interview procedure. The length <strong>of</strong> the interview ranged from 40 mm to over<br />

2 h in one case. Of the 3 000 questionnaires distributed, about 1 000 were<br />

returned completed from 42 countries (Table 1).<br />

The questionnaires were analyzed according to such factors as age, educational<br />

background, literacy, and occupation (Table 2). The most surprising<br />

finding was that only 80% <strong>of</strong> those interviewed understood the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

the skull-and-crossbones symbol, which has been in use for more than 50<br />

years. It was reassuring, therefore, to find a high level <strong>of</strong> spontaneous understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proposed pictograms; immediate understanding <strong>of</strong> the symbols<br />

ranged from 60% to 85% (Fig. 3). The most difficult concept to convey<br />

without explanation was the linkage <strong>of</strong> advice pictograms to activity pictograms.<br />

Ot those interviewed, 90% considered pictograms a useful way to<br />

provide safety instructions on labels.<br />

Both the <strong>International</strong> Association <strong>of</strong> Agrochemical Manufacturers and the<br />

FAO began promoting the use <strong>of</strong> the recommended pictograms in 1988. A<br />

survey <strong>of</strong> 96 countries in 1990 revealed that 69% were using them (Table 3).<br />

It is reassuring to observe the high level <strong>of</strong> use in Africa and the Middle East<br />

and, to a lesser degree, in the Far East and Latin America, although an<br />

impediment to early use in some countries has been the need to change<br />

national legislation. Use <strong>of</strong> pictograms has been rejected in the USA, Canada,<br />

and many European countries, where they are thought to be for developing<br />

countries only. However, these countries have both illiterate and immigrant<br />

STORAGE<br />

Plctogram<br />

ACTIVITY<br />

Plctograina<br />

ADVICE<br />

Plotogram.<br />

WARNING<br />

Plctogran,.<br />

Keep locked<br />

away and<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> reach<br />

<strong>of</strong> children<br />

Handling<br />

liquid<br />

Wear<br />

010008<br />

Wear<br />

boots<br />

Dangeroun/<br />

hernrful to<br />

Hpndlinq<br />

dry<br />

Wear eye<br />

protection<br />

Wreer<br />

protection<br />

and mouth<br />

Dangerous/<br />

harmful to<br />

fish - do not<br />

lakoe, ricars,<br />

ponds or<br />

162<br />

LI<br />

Apphcation<br />

Wash eher<br />

Wear<br />

respirator<br />

Fig. 3. Pictograms preferred by the majority <strong>of</strong> people surveyed.<br />

w)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!