26.12.2012 Views

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Formulation-specific concerns<br />

The extent to which wildlife species are exposed to the active ingredient in a<br />

pesticide formulation is usually unclear. Similarly, it is generally not known<br />

how long the various other elements <strong>of</strong> a pesticide formulation remain with<br />

the active ingredient.<br />

Predictably, granular formulations <strong>of</strong> organophosphate and carbamate insecticides<br />

are equal or less toxic than the equivalent technical grade materials (Hill<br />

and Camardese 1984). Unfortunately, granular formulations tend to enhance<br />

the availability <strong>of</strong> a pesticide to birds, which negates any advantage <strong>of</strong> reduced<br />

toxicity. Liquid formulations, on the other hand, are typically more toxic than<br />

the pesticide parent material (Hill 1986).<br />

Application rates and expected residue levels<br />

Under operational conditions, considerable variation in application rates <strong>of</strong><br />

pesticides can be expected. This is generally not recognized as a problem by<br />

pesticide users, because <strong>of</strong> the relatively wide margin <strong>of</strong> safety <strong>of</strong> pesticides<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> both efficacy and safety to the crop. Exact application <strong>of</strong> a pesticide<br />

according to label instructions would require accurate measuring <strong>of</strong> the various<br />

components, perfect calibration <strong>of</strong> the equipment being used, faultless<br />

technique on the part <strong>of</strong> the applicator, and ideal weather conditions and<br />

terrain. Even under the highly regulated and mechanized conditions <strong>of</strong> developed<br />

countries, these requirements cannot be met. It is more reasonable to<br />

expect that the rate <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> the pesticide follows a broad distribution<br />

about the desired application rate. This is especially true in the developing<br />

world where most spraying is done using by knapsack sprayers and is more<br />

vulnerable to human error.<br />

Other situations also give rise to a higher-than-intended rate <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong><br />

a pesticide. Drift is a problem during both ground and aerial applications. For<br />

hazard assessment, an important aspect is the additive nature <strong>of</strong> droplet drift<br />

associated with multip'e-swath applications. This can give rise to high pesticide<br />

application levels in downwind fields and beyond (Maybank et al. 1978).<br />

If the route <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> wildlife species is primarily through the consumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> contaminated food, the degree <strong>of</strong> exposure is only approximately<br />

related to the amount <strong>of</strong> pesticide delivered to the crop and nearby noncrop<br />

areas. In currently accepted procedures for risk assessment (Urban and Cooke<br />

1986), residue levels on foodstuffs are estimated on the basis <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

factors that assume that the rate <strong>of</strong> application and surface area are the only<br />

factors having a bearing on residue levels. However, widespread mortality <strong>of</strong><br />

waterfowl caused by the use <strong>of</strong> the insecticide diazinon (Stone and Gradoni<br />

1985; Frank et al. 1991) illustrates the difficulties associated with accurately<br />

predicting residue levels on plant surfaces (Mineau 1991). Residue on grass<br />

blades after a mechanized application <strong>of</strong> diazinon at the rate <strong>of</strong> 1.1 kg active<br />

:246

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!