26.12.2012 Views

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Study design<br />

The study was carried out in two stages. A prestudy was conducted to evaluate<br />

the comfort, acceptability, and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> protective garments made <strong>of</strong><br />

the nonwoven materials, Kleenguard and Tyvek, to select one for use in the<br />

main study. In the main study, we evaluated garments made <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />

material and cotton.<br />

On day I <strong>of</strong> the prestudy, one group <strong>of</strong> workers wore Kleenguard protective<br />

garments, the other group wore Tyvek garments. All workers wore cotton<br />

sampling garments beneath their protective clothing to assess its permeability<br />

to the insecticide during work. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the day's operations, the<br />

protective and sampling garments were removed carefully from each operator.<br />

Each garment was turned inside out and wrapped in aluminium foil. Each<br />

foil package was placed in a polyethylene bag labeled with the worker's<br />

number, day, type <strong>of</strong> garment, and date. All garments were kept in refrigerated<br />

storage before analysis.<br />

On day 2, workers in both groups wore new Kleenguard protective garments<br />

without sampling garments underneath to assess comfort. On day 3, this<br />

procedure was repeated using Tyvek protective garments.<br />

On days I and 6 <strong>of</strong> the main study, one group <strong>of</strong> workers wore Kleenguard<br />

protective garments and the other group wore cotton. All workers wore cotton<br />

sampling garments under their protective clothing to assess their protection<br />

against insecticide. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the day's work, the protective and<br />

sampling garments were removed and stored as described for the prestudy.<br />

On day 2 (main study), new protective garments were issued to the two groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> workers (Kleenguard for one group, cotton for the other) for daily assessment<br />

<strong>of</strong> comfort and durability. Each worker wore the same garment until<br />

either the study team agreed that it could no longer be worn because <strong>of</strong><br />

deterioration or until the end <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />

Regular assessments were also made <strong>of</strong> the performance and condition <strong>of</strong><br />

protective gloves and face shields. The opinions <strong>of</strong> the mixerloaders were<br />

obtained through the use <strong>of</strong> a questionnaire.<br />

Daily operations<br />

To standardize the daily work as much as possible, the two mixerloaders in<br />

each group prepared Tamaron spray solution for the spray operators in their<br />

respective group. Each mixerloader handled the same quantity <strong>of</strong> the insecticide<br />

formulation.<br />

The spray operators applied the same volume <strong>of</strong> insecticide (seven knapsack<br />

tanks) each day. Operators worked sufficiently far apart to minimize the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> cross-contamination due to drift from other sprayers.<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!