26.12.2012 Views

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1. Worker assessment <strong>of</strong> two types <strong>of</strong> protective garments:<br />

Kleenguard and Tyvek.<br />

Question n<br />

Was it comfortable? 20 20 0 9 11<br />

Did it feel hotter?<br />

Any problem when spraying?<br />

20<br />

16<br />

10<br />

3<br />

10<br />

13<br />

19<br />

ba<br />

1<br />

6<br />

Did you like the garments? 20 19 1 9 11<br />

a<br />

The main pmblem was sticking and wrinkling.<br />

Table 2. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Kleenguard (K) and cotton (C) protective garments<br />

regarding comfort and acceptability (numbers represent positive answers).<br />

Day2 Day3 Day5<br />

Question n K C K C K C<br />

Was it comfortable? 10 10 10 9 10 10 10<br />

Did it feel hotter? 10 10 7 10 7 8 4<br />

Any problem when spraying? 8 0 0 2 0 3 3<br />

Did youlikethegarments? 10 10 8 10 10 10 9<br />

garments to wrinkle. Most <strong>of</strong> the workers with Tyvek garments felt hotter as<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> wearing them. On the basis <strong>of</strong> questionnaire results and observations<br />

made by the study team, it was decided that Kleenguard garments would<br />

be used in the main study.<br />

Workers wearing both Kleenguard and cotton stated that the garments were<br />

comfortable to wear every day <strong>of</strong> the main study (Table 2). Most workers in<br />

both groups experienced no problems. When problems did occur, they were<br />

due to the individual fit <strong>of</strong> the garment rather than general physical discomfort.<br />

Although most workers felt somewhat hotter when wearing the<br />

garments, this was not sufficient to cause undue stress or loss <strong>of</strong> working<br />

efficiency. By day 5, fewer workers wearing cotton garments felt hotter.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the cotton protective garments were unaffected by wear over the first<br />

3 days (Table 3). From day 4 on, an increasing number <strong>of</strong> cotton garments<br />

showed signs <strong>of</strong> slight chafing, mainly around the shoulders, lower back,<br />

around the buttock area, and knees. There was no evidence <strong>of</strong> tearing or<br />

splitting.<br />

Kleenguard garments showed evidence <strong>of</strong> slight chafing on day 1. By day 3,<br />

the chafing was pronounced and tearing and splitting <strong>of</strong> the garments was<br />

also noted. This was more evident in the garments worn by workers who<br />

carried the knapsack sprayers, which rubbed against their shoulders and<br />

lower back. The damage was progressive; by day 6, all Kleenguard garments<br />

were affected, some producing severe chafing. The chafing was mostly on the<br />

shoulders and lower back.<br />

190<br />

Kleenguard Tyvek<br />

Yes No Yes No

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!