26.12.2012 Views

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

Impact of - IDL-BNC @ IDRC - International Development Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For example, searching for carcasses on treated fields is <strong>of</strong>ten thought to be a<br />

reliable method <strong>of</strong> detecting impact. Yet, it has not been ascertained whether<br />

affected wildlife die locally or, if they are able, choose to leave the area and die<br />

further afield (Mineau and Collins 1988).<br />

Compound-specific studies are conducted in several ways. Some involve the<br />

controlled application <strong>of</strong> a pesticide by the investigators; others may take place<br />

during the normal operational use <strong>of</strong> the product, with or without the knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the user. Again, the research question being asked determines which<br />

strategy is most appropriate. As well, considerations <strong>of</strong> cost and logistics <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

weigh heavily in this decision. The interpretation <strong>of</strong> results will have different<br />

emphasis, depending on whether the application was carefully controlled or<br />

conducted under variable conditions typical <strong>of</strong> operational use.<br />

Pesticides known to have high acute toxicity and identified routes <strong>of</strong> exposure<br />

for several species usually prompt these types <strong>of</strong> investigations. Reports <strong>of</strong><br />

wildlife kills connected with the use <strong>of</strong> a particular pesticide product may also<br />

trigger an enquiry. Common field-testing protocols are listed in Table 4, along<br />

with examples and critiques. An overview by Fite et al. (1988) provides<br />

guidance on most <strong>of</strong> the study types mentioned. Other recent assessments <strong>of</strong><br />

wildlife field-testing can be found in Creaves et al. (1988) and Conservation<br />

Foundation (1989).<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> reference compounds<br />

It is <strong>of</strong>ten impractical or not economically feasible to test every potentially<br />

hazardous pesticide. Extensive studies <strong>of</strong> one or several products with a<br />

similar pattern <strong>of</strong> use can prove helpful as benchmarks. Untested related<br />

Table 4. Common field-testing strategies for compound-specific enquiries.<br />

Strategy Protocols or critique Examples<br />

Carcass searches Mineau and Collins 1988 Brewer et al. 1988<br />

Surveys Ralph and Scott 1980 Peakall and Bart 1983<br />

Edwards etal. 1979<br />

Milliken 1988<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> biomarkers Hill and Fleming 1982 Busby et al. 1989<br />

Mineau and Peakall 1987<br />

Fairbrother et al. 1991<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> sentinel species Robinson et al. 1988<br />

Monitoring reproduction in - Powell 1984<br />

naturally nesting species Busby et al. 1990<br />

Fox et al. 1989<br />

Multiple approach - Bunyan et al. 1981<br />

254

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!