The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Securing Verdicts: The Misuse of Witness Testimony at The Hague Erdemovic, and according to Erdemovic issued orders in the massacre case. If Erdemovic had served time for crimes of war Pelemis was a likely candidate as well. And he should have been in a position to provide more details and name more names. Then there is the odd case of Marko Boskic, yet another Bosnian Croat member of the 10th Sabotage Detachment who took part in the Branjevo farm killings. ICTY “investigator” Jean-Rene Ruez had testified at The Hague on Nov. 19, 1996, that Erdemovic had named the members of the unit: “The officer in charge of the Unit who ordered the murder, Srebrenica is Lieutenant Pelemis who is in charge of the 10th Sabotage Unit. The members of the execution group who were involved…their names were also given by Mr. Erdemovic; the head of that group being Brano Gojkovic. The other members being Aleksandar Cvetkovic, Marko Boskic, Zoran Goranja, Stanko Savanovic, Vlastimir Golijan, Franc Kos.” 80 So, in 1996 then, it was public knowledge that Marko Boskic had been named as one of the killers at Branjevo farm. Yet, in 2000, Boskic was able to enter the United States without any trouble at all. In May 1996, the Boston Globe had even run an article on Boskic (at that time residing in Bosnia). 81 During his sojourn in the United States, Boskic had repeated run-ins with the law, which led to numerous arrests on charges of drunken driving and serious assaults. Finally, in August 2004, he was arrested and charged with having lied on his immigration application, specifically for having failed to disclose that he had been a member of the 10th Sabotage Detachment and a participant in the Branjevo farm massacre. The ICTY announced immediately that it had no interest in seeking Boskic’s extradition. A spokesman claimed that the tribunal only had resources to go after the big fish. “We are a small institution with a limited capacity,” said Anton Nikiforov, an adviser to Carla Del Ponte. “We go after the main players, those who planned and ordered the killings.” 82 He didn’t explain how the ICTY could go after those who “planned and ordered the killings” without obtaining first the evidence and testimony of those who actually carried out the killings. In 2006, a Massachusetts federal court convicted Boskic on two counts of immigration document fraud and sentenced him to five years in prison. There is nothing to indicate that the ICTY will seek his arrest when he comes out. 194
Securing Verdicts: The Misuse of Witness Testimony at The Hague Although the contradictions in Erdemovic’s various testimonies abound, the truth of his key claims beg for corroboration, and the funder and organizer of this massacre remain unclear, the ICTY prosecution and court have never called any of the seven other members of his death unit to testify, nor the lieutenant in charge of this unit. This was the key witness in the July 1996 Rule 61 hearing in absentia of Karadzic and Mladic, and the main witness to the overall claim of a Srebrenica massacre. It seems that as Erdemovic was prepared to say what the ICTY and its sponsors wanted said, nothing more was required for this faux judicial process. The search for truth was not on the agenda. Miroslav Deronjic and Momir Nikolic There are two other so-called insiders whose self-serving confessions the ICTY has touted as proof of Serb genocidal plans. Momir Nikolic, former chief of security and intelligence of the BSA’s Bratunac Brigade, and Miroslav Deronjic, former civilian commissioner of Srebrenica, both gave lengthy witness statements and testified numerous times at the ICTY claiming to have taken part in, and known about, an alleged Serbian plan to execute the male Muslim population of Srebrenica. Both men pleaded guilty and both managed, after hundreds of hours of negotiations with prosecutors, to come up with stories very much in accord with the official ICTY Srebrenica narrative. Both men unreservedly ascribed responsibility for the alleged massacre to Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic. The most striking aspects of the two men’s testimony was the fact that neither was present at any killing and, as with Erdemovic, both failed to produce any supporting evidence—either documentary evidence or corroborating testimony—to support their claims. For example, though Karadzic supposedly uttered his threatening words —“Miroslav, those people there must be killed….Whatever you can, you have to kill”—in the presence of Momcilo Krajisnik and Jovica Stanisic, conveniently both men were out of earshot when he spoke to Deronjic. 83 Reading the trial testimonies of Nikolic and Deronjic is a bizarre experience. Not only do the two men continually contradict themselves and provide evasive answers when pressed, neither man ever saw any killings himself nor witnessed any of the alleged burials and re-burials. 195
Page 1 and 2:
The SREBRENICA MASSACRE Evidence, C
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS Maps 4-6 Foreword 7 Philli
Page 5 and 6:
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Summer 1995
Page 7 and 8:
FOREWORD Phillip Corwin On July 11,
Page 9 and 10:
Foreword Serbs had lived in Western
Page 11 and 12:
Foreword not allow the Serbian peop
Page 13 and 14:
PREFACE Edward S. Herman Srebrenica
Page 15 and 16:
Preface event and symbol demonstrat
Page 17 and 18:
Preface Against Radovan Karadzic an
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Edward S. He
Page 21 and 22:
Introduction exact provenance of th
Page 23 and 24:
Introduction chose or vetted key pe
Page 25 and 26:
Introduction ern disinterest in pre
Page 27 and 28:
Introduction control of Kosovo.”
Page 29 and 30:
Introduction tle bombing to see rea
Page 31 and 32:
Notes Introduction 1 “Bosnia: 2 O
Page 33 and 34:
Introduction cating satellite photo
Page 35 and 36:
Introduction 31 See Johnstone, Fool
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 2 Prelude to the Capture of
Page 39 and 40:
Prelude to the Capture of Srebrenic
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
The Military Context of the Fall of
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Preface video footage to the intern
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 4 The Numbers Game Jonathan
Page 103 and 104:
The Numbers Game proof of Serb evil
Page 105 and 106:
The Numbers Game tled on the figure
Page 107 and 108:
The Numbers Game makes it mathemati
Page 109 and 110:
The Numbers Game the first 48 hours
Page 111 and 112:
The Numbers Game vivors, even thoug
Page 113 and 114:
The Numbers Game have taken place,
Page 115 and 116:
The Numbers Game made by the U.S. A
Page 117 and 118:
The Numbers Game photographs so tha
Page 119 and 120:
The Numbers Game led to expect ...
Page 121 and 122:
The Numbers Game ber.” But on Apr
Page 123 and 124:
The Numbers Game The Graves, which
Page 125 and 126:
The Numbers Game cutions…. Summar
Page 127 and 128:
The Numbers Game hiding proof of a
Page 129 and 130:
The Numbers Game although how limit
Page 131 and 132:
The Numbers Game As noted above, on
Page 133 and 134:
The Numbers Game mon in the Srebren
Page 135 and 136:
The Numbers Game tween the Red Cros
Page 137 and 138:
The Numbers Game More than 600 deta
Page 139 and 140:
The Numbers Game degree of independ
Page 141 and 142:
The Numbers Game and George Soros
Page 143 and 144: The Numbers Game mate for the total
Page 145 and 146: The Numbers Game ports of possible
Page 147 and 148: The Numbers Game brenica...The Deco
Page 149 and 150: The Numbers Game - Herzegovina. See
Page 151 and 152: The Numbers Game Visegrad, Rogatica
Page 153 and 154: CHAPTER 5 Securing Verdicts: The Mi
Page 155 and 156: Securing Verdicts: The Misuse of Wi
Page 193: Securing Verdicts: The Misuse of Wi
Page 211 and 212: CHAPTER 6 The ICTY Calls It “Geno
Page 213 and 214: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” pr
Page 215 and 216: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” to
Page 217 and 218: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” No
Page 219 and 220: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” ma
Page 221 and 222: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” to
Page 223 and 224: The ICTY Calls It “Genocide” Re
Page 225 and 226: UN Report on Srebrenica—A Distort
Page 245 and 246:
UN Report on Srebrenica—A Distort
Page 247 and 248:
UN Report on Srebrenica—A Distort
Page 249 and 250:
U.S. Media Coverage of Srebrenica a
Page 251 and 252:
U.S. Media Coverage of Srebrenica t
Page 253 and 254:
U.S. Media Coverage of Srebrenica T
Page 255 and 256:
U.S. Media Coverage of Srebrenica o
Page 257 and 258:
U.S. Media Coverage of Srebrenica T
Page 259 and 260:
CHAPTER 9 U.K. Media Coverage of Sr
Page 261 and 262:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica f
Page 263 and 264:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica p
Page 265 and 266:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica t
Page 267 and 268:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica p
Page 269 and 270:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica v
Page 271 and 272:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica e
Page 273 and 274:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica i
Page 275 and 276:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica a
Page 277 and 278:
U.K. Media Coverage of Srebrenica S
Page 279 and 280:
Summary and Conclusions believe the
Page 281 and 282:
Summary and Conclusions combat deat
Page 283 and 284:
Summary and Conclusions from even l
Page 285 and 286:
Summary and Conclusions UN officers
Page 287 and 288:
Summary and Conclusions a genocide
Page 289 and 290:
Summary and Conclusions the mercies
Page 291 and 292:
Summary and Conclusions the conflic
Page 293 and 294:
Summary and Conclusions agenda and
Page 295 and 296:
Summary and Conclusions server, Jun
Page 297 and 298:
Summary and Conclusions 28 See abov
Page 299 and 300:
Note on Contributors George Bogdani
Page 301:
301
show all

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?