05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 6<br />

<strong>The</strong> ICTY Calls It “Genocide”<br />

Michael Mandel<br />

On August 2, 2001, Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal<br />

Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) ruled that the events at <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

in July 1995 constituted “genocide.” 1 For this and other crimes<br />

they sentenced General Radovan Krstic, in charge of one of the corps<br />

involved in the operation, to imprisonment for 46 years. On April 19,<br />

2004, the ICTY Appeals Chamber reduced Krstic‘s conviction to one<br />

of “aiding and abetting” and his sentence to 35 years imprisonment,<br />

while re-affirming the legal characterization of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> as genocide. 2<br />

But if the Krstic case stands for anything, it stands for the fact that<br />

genocide did not occur at <strong>Srebrenica</strong>. And the Court’s conclusion that<br />

it did can only be considered a legal form of propaganda, and another<br />

contribution to the impression of the Tribunal as more a “political tool”<br />

than a “juridical institution,” to paraphrase its most famous defendant. 3<br />

<strong>The</strong> Tribunal’s claim that genocide occurred at <strong>Srebrenica</strong> was not<br />

supported by the facts it found or by the law it cited. Even the Trial<br />

Chamber’s conclusion that “Bosnian Serb forces executed several thousand<br />

Bosnian Muslim men [with the] total number of victims…likely<br />

to be within the range of 7,000 - 8,000 men” was not supported by its<br />

explicit findings. 4 <strong>The</strong> number of bodies exhumed amounted to only<br />

2,028, and the Chamber conceded that even a number of these had<br />

died in combat, in fact going so far as to say that the evidence only “suggested”<br />

that “the majority” of those killed had not been killed in combat:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> results of the forensic investigations suggest that the majority<br />

of bodies exhumed were not killed in combat; they were killed in mass<br />

executions.” 5 <strong>The</strong> highest expert estimate before the court of those who<br />

went missing after the takeover of the enclave, and had not yet been accounted<br />

for was 7,475, and the Trial Chamber found that the evidence<br />

as a whole only “strongly suggests that well in excess of 7,000 people went<br />

missing following the take-over of <strong>Srebrenica</strong>.” <strong>The</strong> evidence was found<br />

only to “support the proposition that the majority of missing people<br />

were, in fact, executed and buried in the mass graves.” 6 A majority of a<br />

maximum of 7,000 - 8000 would put the maximum executed closer to<br />

4,000.<br />

211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!