The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 6<br />
<strong>The</strong> ICTY Calls It “Genocide”<br />
Michael Mandel<br />
On August 2, 2001, Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal<br />
Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) ruled that the events at <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />
in July 1995 constituted “genocide.” 1 For this and other crimes<br />
they sentenced General Radovan Krstic, in charge of one of the corps<br />
involved in the operation, to imprisonment for 46 years. On April 19,<br />
2004, the ICTY Appeals Chamber reduced Krstic‘s conviction to one<br />
of “aiding and abetting” and his sentence to 35 years imprisonment,<br />
while re-affirming the legal characterization of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> as genocide. 2<br />
But if the Krstic case stands for anything, it stands for the fact that<br />
genocide did not occur at <strong>Srebrenica</strong>. And the Court’s conclusion that<br />
it did can only be considered a legal form of propaganda, and another<br />
contribution to the impression of the Tribunal as more a “political tool”<br />
than a “juridical institution,” to paraphrase its most famous defendant. 3<br />
<strong>The</strong> Tribunal’s claim that genocide occurred at <strong>Srebrenica</strong> was not<br />
supported by the facts it found or by the law it cited. Even the Trial<br />
Chamber’s conclusion that “Bosnian Serb forces executed several thousand<br />
Bosnian Muslim men [with the] total number of victims…likely<br />
to be within the range of 7,000 - 8,000 men” was not supported by its<br />
explicit findings. 4 <strong>The</strong> number of bodies exhumed amounted to only<br />
2,028, and the Chamber conceded that even a number of these had<br />
died in combat, in fact going so far as to say that the evidence only “suggested”<br />
that “the majority” of those killed had not been killed in combat:<br />
“<strong>The</strong> results of the forensic investigations suggest that the majority<br />
of bodies exhumed were not killed in combat; they were killed in mass<br />
executions.” 5 <strong>The</strong> highest expert estimate before the court of those who<br />
went missing after the takeover of the enclave, and had not yet been accounted<br />
for was 7,475, and the Trial Chamber found that the evidence<br />
as a whole only “strongly suggests that well in excess of 7,000 people went<br />
missing following the take-over of <strong>Srebrenica</strong>.” <strong>The</strong> evidence was found<br />
only to “support the proposition that the majority of missing people<br />
were, in fact, executed and buried in the mass graves.” 6 A majority of a<br />
maximum of 7,000 - 8000 would put the maximum executed closer to<br />
4,000.<br />
211