05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Prelude to the Capture of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

and the head of intelligence until the final months of the war, observes:<br />

“<strong>The</strong> US approach to the war in Bosnia is torn by a fundamental contradiction.<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States says that its objective is to end the war<br />

through a negotiated settlement, but in reality what it wants is to influence<br />

the outcome in favor of the Muslims.” 4<br />

At a time when NATO’s historic mission had vanished with the collapse<br />

of the Soviet Union, U.S. policymakers were anxious to maintain<br />

a major role in Europe, which meant a new role for NATO had to be<br />

found. If the Yugoslav conflict was resolved diplomatically without the<br />

U.S., the need for NATO would be further diminished and might be<br />

replaced . by a European alliance (as originally envisioned by President<br />

Dwight Eisenhower). Indeed, high-level discussions of the Western European<br />

Union military alliance had been going on in 1992 between<br />

Germany and France.<br />

In Balkan Tragedy, Susan Woodward observes that “while the Bush<br />

administration chose to abdicate leadership in the early stages of the<br />

Yugoslav conflict, both the Bush and the Clinton administrations were<br />

also unwilling to remain uninvolved, leaving the situation entirely to<br />

Europeans. Whenever developments toward the Yugoslav conflict<br />

seemed to challenge the U.S. leadership role in Europe, it stepped in.” 5<br />

Despite the violence that accompanied the successful separatist campaigns<br />

in Slovenia and Croatia in 1991, senior diplomats believed that<br />

war in Bosnia was avoidable. UN Secretary-General Perez de Cuellar,<br />

former U.S. Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and European Community<br />

mediator Lord Peter Carrington all warned that diplomatic recognition<br />

of armed separatist republics would damage chances of a peaceful settlement<br />

of the conflict.<br />

Germany’s plan to recognize Croatia and Slovenia was initially opposed<br />

by the United States, until the Germans succeeded in pressing a<br />

reluctant European Community to join them. At this point, the first<br />

Bush administration, under pressure from the leaders of Saudi Arabia to<br />

recognize Bosnia as a future Muslim-led European state, persuaded the<br />

Europeans to extend diplomatic recognition to Bosnia on April 6, 1992<br />

in return for U.S. recognition of Slovenia and Croatia. As in the cases<br />

of Slovenia and Croatia one year earlier, this was done despite the fact<br />

that no agreement had been reached on the question of independence<br />

from Yugoslavia among the Muslims, Serbs, and Croats whose nations<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!