05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

U.K. Media Coverage of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

ports; second, that the estimates of numbers missing and presumed dead<br />

vary widely and develop into an orthodoxy only slowly over a period of<br />

weeks.<br />

(i) Context, background and explanation<br />

On July 16, 1995, John Sweeney noted in <strong>The</strong> Guardian that “<strong>The</strong><br />

fall started with a massacre of the villagers of Visnijca. Burning roofs,<br />

butchered peasants: a familiar sight but with a twist. <strong>The</strong> killers were<br />

Muslims, the victims Serbs. In early June a commando of Bosnian<br />

armija, loyal to the multi-ethnic but mainly Muslim Sarajevo government,<br />

had left the enclave to torch Visnijca.” This is thin, but it does<br />

present the Serb attack on <strong>Srebrenica</strong> as part of an on-going conflict between<br />

two sides, rather than a premeditated plan for genocide. Sweeney’s<br />

explanation of the attack was that “<strong>The</strong>ir blood up, the Bosnian Serbs<br />

took their revenge.” 14<br />

In <strong>The</strong> Independent, Robert Block reported that “Muslim soldiers<br />

from <strong>Srebrenica</strong> were effective fighters and on several occasions during<br />

the war managed to break out of the enclave and raze several nearby villages,<br />

killing many Serb civilians in the process.” 15 Again, this is hardly<br />

substantial, but does at least differ from the way that later reporting<br />

often tended to present the Muslims of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> purely as victims.<br />

(ii) Estimates of numbers missing<br />

With hindsight, it is instructive to examine how the estimates of<br />

numbers missing or killed varied widely, and to track the sources who<br />

were suggesting different figures. John Sweeney’s July 16 report, quoted<br />

above, asserted that “Everyone knows what is happening to the Muslim<br />

men of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> right now. Around 10,000 of them have gone missing.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y are being ‘questioned’.” 16 In the same day’s edition of <strong>The</strong><br />

Guardian, E.U. commissioner for humanitarian affairs Emma Bonino<br />

was quoted as saying that “<strong>The</strong> major problem is missing<br />

persons…some 15,000 of them.” 17<br />

It seems clear that the 10,000 estimate was worked out on the basis<br />

of subtracting the number of refugees from <strong>Srebrenica</strong> from the estimated<br />

1993 population of the town. As Christopher Bellamy reported<br />

in <strong>The</strong> Independent: “<strong>The</strong>re were some 42,000 people in the enclave in<br />

1993. Yesterday the UN refugee camp at Tuzla had registered 6,440<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!