05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Military Context of the Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

From October on the focus was on agreeing to the terms of peace<br />

which led eventually to a signing in Paris via a U.S. military base in<br />

Dayton, Ohio, but even here, the Bosnian Serbs were humiliated. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

own leaders were not allowed to represent them, with Radovan Karadzic<br />

aid Ratko Mladic having been indicted in late July for war crimes and<br />

even genocide, and they were replaced by Slobodan Milosevic, the president<br />

of a different country—a point that the West had been prepared<br />

to take up arms to uphold. Furthermore, when the chips were down,<br />

Milosevic had not come to the assistance of either the Krajina or the<br />

Bosnian Serbs.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Of necessity this has been a short review of the military events that<br />

structured and conditioned the end of the war in Bosnia, but it should<br />

hopefully have provided a context in which to place the fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tide of war was definitely already running against the Bosnian<br />

Serbs. <strong>The</strong> ceasefire negotiated in December 1994 by Jimmy Carter represented<br />

a good starting point to achieve peace. However, the Croatian<br />

and Bosnian SDA Muslim leaders were committed to pursuing military<br />

solutions whatever the costs to their own people—arguably slight<br />

for the Croats, but disastrous for the Bosnian Muslims.<br />

Though misguided and deplorable, this is at least an understandable<br />

position for parties to a war. What is completely unpardonable is the<br />

role of the Western powers and of the United States in particular that,<br />

instead of being an “honest broker” supporting a negotiated peace, encouraged<br />

the escalation of military violence and for longer than three<br />

years actively undermined any peaceful solutions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> double standards demonstrated by the West in their complete<br />

lack of response to the Croat attack on Western Slavonia in early May<br />

1995, on the one hand, and the air strikes following a relatively minor<br />

infringement by Bosnian Serbs around Sarajevo in late May 1995, on<br />

the other, were bound to increase the likelihood that the Bosnian Serbs<br />

would see that only military “facts on the ground” would be recognised<br />

and that the West was acting in bad faith.<br />

Despite these pressures, the BSA exercised restraint and did not unleash<br />

their weapons with the aim of causing maximum civilian casual-<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!