The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> Military Context of the Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />
From October on the focus was on agreeing to the terms of peace<br />
which led eventually to a signing in Paris via a U.S. military base in<br />
Dayton, Ohio, but even here, the Bosnian Serbs were humiliated. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />
own leaders were not allowed to represent them, with Radovan Karadzic<br />
aid Ratko Mladic having been indicted in late July for war crimes and<br />
even genocide, and they were replaced by Slobodan Milosevic, the president<br />
of a different country—a point that the West had been prepared<br />
to take up arms to uphold. Furthermore, when the chips were down,<br />
Milosevic had not come to the assistance of either the Krajina or the<br />
Bosnian Serbs.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Of necessity this has been a short review of the military events that<br />
structured and conditioned the end of the war in Bosnia, but it should<br />
hopefully have provided a context in which to place the fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> tide of war was definitely already running against the Bosnian<br />
Serbs. <strong>The</strong> ceasefire negotiated in December 1994 by Jimmy Carter represented<br />
a good starting point to achieve peace. However, the Croatian<br />
and Bosnian SDA Muslim leaders were committed to pursuing military<br />
solutions whatever the costs to their own people—arguably slight<br />
for the Croats, but disastrous for the Bosnian Muslims.<br />
Though misguided and deplorable, this is at least an understandable<br />
position for parties to a war. What is completely unpardonable is the<br />
role of the Western powers and of the United States in particular that,<br />
instead of being an “honest broker” supporting a negotiated peace, encouraged<br />
the escalation of military violence and for longer than three<br />
years actively undermined any peaceful solutions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> double standards demonstrated by the West in their complete<br />
lack of response to the Croat attack on Western Slavonia in early May<br />
1995, on the one hand, and the air strikes following a relatively minor<br />
infringement by Bosnian Serbs around Sarajevo in late May 1995, on<br />
the other, were bound to increase the likelihood that the Bosnian Serbs<br />
would see that only military “facts on the ground” would be recognised<br />
and that the West was acting in bad faith.<br />
Despite these pressures, the BSA exercised restraint and did not unleash<br />
their weapons with the aim of causing maximum civilian casual-<br />
93