05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Prelude to the Capture of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

tention on the plight of Sarajevo. Owen also stated that UN observers<br />

noted that Bosnian Army forces fired mortar weapons from aside the<br />

Kosevo hospital to provoke retaliatory fire from Serbian forces, events<br />

which credulous reporters invariably described as Serb shelling of the<br />

Kosevo hospital. 26<br />

A pattern of staged incidents to engage world sympathy was revealed<br />

in a classified UN report leaked to the London newspaper, <strong>The</strong> Independent,<br />

which reported: “United Nations officials and senior Western<br />

military officers believe some of the worst killings in Sarajevo, including<br />

the massacre of at least 16 people in a bread queue, were carried out<br />

by the city’s mainly Muslim defenders—not Serb besiegers—as a propaganda<br />

ploy to win world sympathy and military intervention. . . . Classified<br />

reports to the UN force commander [in Zagreb], General Satish<br />

Nambiar, concluded . . . that Bosnian forces loyal to President Alija<br />

Izetbegovic may have detonated a bomb. ‘We believe it was a commanddetonated<br />

explosion, probably in a can,’ a UN official said then.” 27<br />

<strong>The</strong> successful attempt by Muslim forces to cast suspicion on Serbs<br />

for a staged atrocity—which came to be known as the “breadline massacre”<br />

of May 27, 1992—seriously affected the development of the conflict,<br />

because it gave strong impetus to the passage three days later of<br />

Security Council Resolution 757, which placed international sanctions<br />

on Serbia, the most important ally of the Bosnian Serbs. 28 <strong>The</strong> sanctions<br />

were proposed by the U.S. to punish the remainder of Yugoslavia<br />

for the alleged presence of Yugoslav troops in Bosnia.<br />

But in fact a UN report, also dated May 30, confirmed that, based<br />

on the best available evidence, “Most” of the JNA was “believed to have<br />

withdrawn already into Serbia and Montenegro,” as they were required<br />

to do under Security Council Resolution 752. 29 By contrast, the UN report<br />

noted that, “As regards the withdrawal of elements of the Croatian<br />

Army now in Bosnia and Herzegovina, no such withdrawal has occurred.”<br />

30 <strong>The</strong> Chairman of the Security Council, Austria’s Ambassador<br />

Peter Hohenfellner, received the report two days before the vote on<br />

U.S. sponsored sanctions, but the report was kept from other members<br />

of the Security Council until one hour after the vote for sanctions<br />

against Yugoslavia. 31 Several delegates complained to reporters that they<br />

had been misled, but the U.S. had prevailed in its efforts to target the<br />

Serbs indelibly as the villains and Muslims would be encouraged to con-<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!