05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 10<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Edward S. Herman<br />

1. Both the scale of the casualties at <strong>Srebrenica</strong> and the context surrounding<br />

the July 1995 killings there have been misrepresented in official<br />

reports from governmental and non-governmental organizations as<br />

well as in the mainstream media. Senior UN military and civilian officials,<br />

NATO intelligence officers, and independent intelligence analysts<br />

dispute the official characterization by the ICTY of the fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

and the evacuation of this “safe area” population as a unique atrocity in<br />

the Bosnian conflict and as a case of genocide. <strong>The</strong> contention that as<br />

many as 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys were executed in the<br />

span of one week, that the <strong>Srebrenica</strong> massacre was the “single worst<br />

atrocity” of the wars in the former Yugoslavia, and the “worst massacre<br />

that occurred in Europe since the months after World War II,” has no<br />

basis in available evidence and is essentially a political construct. 1<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> 8,000 figure was first provided by the Red Cross, based on<br />

their crude estimate that the Bosnian Serb Army had captured 3,000<br />

men and that 5,000 were reported “missing.” 2 It is well established that<br />

thousands of those “missing” had reached safety in cities such as Tuzla<br />

or across the border in Serbia or were killed in fighting en route to Bosnian<br />

Muslim territory. Yet, in a remarkable transformation prompted by<br />

the eagerness to portray the Bosnian Serbs as evil perpetrators of heinous<br />

crimes, and the Bosnian Muslims as their innocent victims, the categories<br />

of those survivors reaching safety and those combatants killed-inaction<br />

were ignored, and the resulting category of the “missing” was<br />

identified with that of the executed. This misleading conflation of separate<br />

categories of persons was helped along by the Red Cross’s reference<br />

to the 5,000 as having “simply disappeared,” and its failure to correct<br />

this politically-loaded usage despite its own recognition that “several<br />

thousand” survivors had reached Bosnian Muslim territory.<br />

It was also helped along by the Bosnian Muslim leadership’s refusal<br />

to disclose the names and numbers of those who fled and reached safety.<br />

But there was an extraordinary readiness on the part of Western governments<br />

and media to ignore those reaching safety, to disregard deaths<br />

in fighting, and to take dead bodies as proof of executions. <strong>The</strong> will to<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!