05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UN Report on <strong>Srebrenica</strong>—A Distorted Picture of Events<br />

dered their colleagues in Sarajevo to brief the press and correct<br />

the record. <strong>The</strong>y did, but they claim it failed to correct the imbalance<br />

in reporting…<strong>The</strong> UN Chief of Staff Brigadier General<br />

Vere Hayes, was interviewed on American TV. “On U.S. television<br />

I explained it, but the State Department did not like<br />

that.” 28<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. State Department resisted attempts to provide the public<br />

with an accurate version of events in Sarajevo, because, as NATO<br />

Deputy Commander Charles Boyd observed, the United States sought<br />

to enable a Muslim military victory, while the UN nominally sought a<br />

negotiated settlement in Bosnia. <strong>The</strong>se clashing goals were something<br />

that the UN report could not acknowledge in its official history of the<br />

war in Bosnia, or in commenting on specific events surrounding the<br />

capture of <strong>Srebrenica</strong>.<br />

“We must see things in the Balkans as they are, not as we wish them<br />

to be. We must separate reality from image,” General Boyd urged in<br />

Foreign Affairs. 29 Instead, the UN report repeatedly ignores or discounts<br />

facts and credible testimony that undermine or discredit the official version<br />

of events according to the U.S. State Department.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> does not even mention that the United States<br />

undermined the crucial Lisbon agreement, negotiated before the outbreak<br />

of fighting by David Carrington and Portuguese Foreign Minister<br />

Jose Cutillero, which many well-placed observers believe would have<br />

prevented the war in Bosnia. <strong>The</strong> Lisbon agreement would have set up<br />

a central government with three self-governing cantons for Serbs, Muslims<br />

and Croats on the model of Switzerland and was signed by all three<br />

parties. <strong>The</strong> agreement collapsed, however, after Bosnia’s Muslim President<br />

Alija Izetbegovic disavowed his signature following a meeting with<br />

U.S. Ambassador to Yugoslavia Warren Zimmerman. When Izetbegovic<br />

complained to Zimmerman that the European Community negotiators<br />

had pressured him into signing, Zimmerman responded: “If he<br />

didn’t like it [i.e., the agreement], why sign it?” 30 Izetbegovic clearly felt<br />

he had American support to disavow his signature, which he did in late<br />

March of 1992, just before the fighting broke out.<br />

<strong>The</strong> UN report’s treatment of the now infamous Markale “Marketplace<br />

<strong>Massacre</strong>” in Sarajevo on February 5, 1994 demolishes any pretense<br />

to objectivity. 31 While noting that the UNPROFOR Commander<br />

232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!