05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Military Context of the Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

supervised collection points which formed part of the heavy weapons exclusion<br />

regime negotiated in February 1994. At the same time British<br />

soldiers came under fire first from Serbs then Muslims as their convoy<br />

approached Gorazde.<br />

Lieut.-General Rupert Smith, the taciturn UNPROFOR commander<br />

who had taken over from the more communicative and even-handed<br />

General Michael Rose, made a rare press appearance to announce that<br />

unless all heavy weapons were returned to collection points by midday,<br />

May 25, air-strikes would be ordered “against the guilty party.” 44 It beggars<br />

belief that NATO jets would ever be ordered to bomb Muslim positions<br />

in Sarajevo whatever they did, and so in effect this was a threat<br />

to one side only—the Bosnian Serbs.<br />

Although the Bosnian Serbs had partially complied with the ultimatum,<br />

this was not judged sufficient and in due course two ammunition<br />

dumps near the Bosnian Serb headquarters in Pale were blown up by<br />

NATO jets on missions approved by UN Special Envoy Akashi. <strong>The</strong><br />

BSA responded by shelling all six safe areas. In Tuzla, 70 people died and<br />

130 were injured. A second wave of NATO bombing then destroyed<br />

another six BSA ammunition dumps. In Zagreb, the UN’s Akaski issued<br />

a justification for the bombing raids that sounded hauntingly Orwellian:<br />

“I decided I had no alternative but to respond to this dangerous situation<br />

that threatens the entire peace process,” his statement began. 45<br />

Now the BSA‘s response was to take UNPROFOR troops hostage<br />

and television pictures of “blue helmets” chained to strategic targets<br />

were soon flashed around the world.<br />

As Tim Ripley writes:<br />

It had all the hallmarks of a desperate last gasp by desperate men<br />

who knew the tide of war was turning against them. One UN<br />

intelligence officer called it an ‘expression of chaos’. <strong>The</strong> Croat<br />

attack in Western Slavonia and the perilous state of the [BSA]<br />

probably made Mladic desperate to try and keep NATO airpower<br />

from being unleashed against his army. Whatever the reason,<br />

the Bosnian Serbs played up the hostages for all they were<br />

worth, both politically and financially, but none of them were<br />

physically harmed. Indeed later it was learnt that many of the<br />

UN ‘human shield’ were only chained up for their video performances<br />

and Pale TV then made a small fortune selling the<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!