The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
UN Report on <strong>Srebrenica</strong>—A Distorted Picture of Events<br />
40 As <strong>The</strong> Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong> describes this story: “Some surviving members of the <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />
delegation have stated that President Izetbegovic also told them he had<br />
learned that a NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina was possible, but<br />
could only occur if the Serbs were to break into <strong>Srebrenica</strong>, killing at least 5,000<br />
of its people. President Izetbegovic has flatly denied making such a statement”<br />
(para. 115).<br />
41 Krstic Trial Transcript, April 4, 2001 , ; and Krstic Trial Transcript, April 5, 2001, .<br />
42 Zvonimir Trajkovic, “<strong>Srebrenica</strong>, lies and media games,” Ogledalo, Belgrade, June<br />
22, 2005, .<br />
43 “President Asks Clinton, Major and Others To Help <strong>Srebrenica</strong>,” BBC Monitoring<br />
Central Europe and Balkans, July 11, 1995, translating a July 9, 1995 report<br />
over Sarajevo-based Radio Bosnia-Hercegovina at 1800 GMT. Also see<br />
“Bosnian president appeals for world leaders to help <strong>Srebrenica</strong>,” Agence France<br />
Presse, July 9, 1995.<br />
44 Carlos Martins Branco, “Was <strong>Srebrenica</strong> a Hoax? Eye-Witness Account of a Former<br />
UN Military Observer in Bosnia,” March 4, 1998 (as posted to the website<br />
of the Centre for Research on Globalisation, ).<br />
Branco continues: “Another curious aspect was the absence<br />
of a military reaction from the 2nd Corps of the Muslim army, which did<br />
nothing to relieve the military pressure on the enclave. It was common knowledge<br />
that the Serbian unit in the region, the ‘Drina Corps’, was exhausted and that the<br />
attack on <strong>Srebrenica</strong> was only possible with the aid of the units from other regions.<br />
Despite this fact, Sarajevo did not lift a finger in order to launch an attack<br />
which would have divided the Serbian forces and exposed the vulnerabilities created<br />
by the concentration of resources around <strong>Srebrenica</strong>. Such an attack would<br />
have reduced the military pressure on the enclave.”<br />
45 Wiebes, Intelligence and the War in Bosnia, 1992 – 1995, Chapter 8, “Was ‘<strong>Srebrenica</strong>’<br />
an intelligence failure?” pp. 355-421; here p. 370.<br />
46 Ibid.<br />
47 Martins Branco, “Was <strong>Srebrenica</strong> a Hoax?”<br />
48 Quoted in George Szamuely, “Securing Verdicts: <strong>The</strong> Misuse of Witness Testimony<br />
at <strong>The</strong> Hague,” Erdemovic Trial Transcript, IT-96-22, November 20, 1996,<br />
p. 318, .<br />
49 <strong>The</strong> UN Report even quotes Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, who had<br />
“noted with some optimism ‘the close collaboration that has developed between<br />
the UN and NATO with regard to the former Yugoslavia’. In particular, he noted<br />
that the threat of NATO air power was effectively used to bring about a positive<br />
result in the safe area of Sarajevo. He therefore concluded that ‘soldiering on in<br />
hope seems preferable to withdrawing in abdication’” (para. 130).<br />
50 See Sect. G, “Operation Storm and the United Sates-led peace initiative,” para.<br />
432-437, of which only para. 433 and 434 actually deal with Operation Storm.<br />
247