05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> Military Context of the Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

Serbs’ opponents which was undoubtedly watched with growing alarm<br />

in Knin, Pale, and for that matter in Belgrade.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. appeared to be unilaterally pressing ahead with its policy of<br />

lifting the arms embargo for the SDA Muslims and Croats and NATO<br />

air strikes against the Serbs, or “lift and strike” as it was known, which<br />

had been rejected by its partners in the Contact Group. <strong>The</strong> danger of<br />

course was that the Serbs would lash out before their enemies became<br />

too strong. It was a risky strategy, but one in which the risks all involved<br />

people on the ground getting killed, almost none of whom were American—Washington<br />

having steadfastly refused to contribute troops to<br />

the UN peacekeeping missions.<br />

A few days later, UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali called<br />

senior UNPROFOR staff to address the UN Security Council. On May<br />

24, the commander of UN peacekeeping forces in Bosnia, Croatia, and<br />

Macedonia, France’s Lieut.-General Bernard Janvier, also briefed a<br />

closed-session of the Security Council, where he suggested that the UN<br />

forces should be withdrawn from the three eastern-most enclaves (i.e.,<br />

<strong>Srebrenica</strong>, Zepa, and Gorazde) because they were impossible to protect<br />

and because he believed UNPROFOR should concentrate on areas<br />

where there was a “peace to keep.” 42 But this was a non-starter for the<br />

U.S. envoy to the UN, Madeleine Albright, who openly and passionately<br />

favored the SDA Muslim government’s every demand. Janvier correctly<br />

pointed out that the SDA Muslims had been responsible for<br />

breaking the December 1994 Carter ceasefire agreement and were using<br />

the safe areas to attack the Serbs in the hope of provoking a sufficiently<br />

furious attack to trigger UN air strikes or even full-scale intervention.<br />

After the closed-session of the Security Council ended, the Russian<br />

Ambassador Sergey Lavrov relayed through Associated Press that (to<br />

quote Lavrov’s words) Janvier had told the Council the UN-designated<br />

“Safe Areas” were “systematically used by the [SDA] government forces<br />

for launching attacks and provoking Serbs,” and UNPROFOR “cannot<br />

pretend that this is a situation where whenever you decide to be robust<br />

against the Serbs you solve the problem.” 43<br />

But the Security Council refused to alter the mission along the lines<br />

suggested by Janvier and so UNPROFOR had to watch as the exchanges<br />

across front-lines intensified. Already the day before, SDA Muslim<br />

and Serb forces had withdrawn their heavy weapons from the UN<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!