The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> Military Context of the Fall of <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />
Serbs’ opponents which was undoubtedly watched with growing alarm<br />
in Knin, Pale, and for that matter in Belgrade.<br />
<strong>The</strong> U.S. appeared to be unilaterally pressing ahead with its policy of<br />
lifting the arms embargo for the SDA Muslims and Croats and NATO<br />
air strikes against the Serbs, or “lift and strike” as it was known, which<br />
had been rejected by its partners in the Contact Group. <strong>The</strong> danger of<br />
course was that the Serbs would lash out before their enemies became<br />
too strong. It was a risky strategy, but one in which the risks all involved<br />
people on the ground getting killed, almost none of whom were American—Washington<br />
having steadfastly refused to contribute troops to<br />
the UN peacekeeping missions.<br />
A few days later, UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali called<br />
senior UNPROFOR staff to address the UN Security Council. On May<br />
24, the commander of UN peacekeeping forces in Bosnia, Croatia, and<br />
Macedonia, France’s Lieut.-General Bernard Janvier, also briefed a<br />
closed-session of the Security Council, where he suggested that the UN<br />
forces should be withdrawn from the three eastern-most enclaves (i.e.,<br />
<strong>Srebrenica</strong>, Zepa, and Gorazde) because they were impossible to protect<br />
and because he believed UNPROFOR should concentrate on areas<br />
where there was a “peace to keep.” 42 But this was a non-starter for the<br />
U.S. envoy to the UN, Madeleine Albright, who openly and passionately<br />
favored the SDA Muslim government’s every demand. Janvier correctly<br />
pointed out that the SDA Muslims had been responsible for<br />
breaking the December 1994 Carter ceasefire agreement and were using<br />
the safe areas to attack the Serbs in the hope of provoking a sufficiently<br />
furious attack to trigger UN air strikes or even full-scale intervention.<br />
After the closed-session of the Security Council ended, the Russian<br />
Ambassador Sergey Lavrov relayed through Associated Press that (to<br />
quote Lavrov’s words) Janvier had told the Council the UN-designated<br />
“Safe Areas” were “systematically used by the [SDA] government forces<br />
for launching attacks and provoking Serbs,” and UNPROFOR “cannot<br />
pretend that this is a situation where whenever you decide to be robust<br />
against the Serbs you solve the problem.” 43<br />
But the Security Council refused to alter the mission along the lines<br />
suggested by Janvier and so UNPROFOR had to watch as the exchanges<br />
across front-lines intensified. Already the day before, SDA Muslim<br />
and Serb forces had withdrawn their heavy weapons from the UN<br />
85