05.01.2013 Views

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

The Srebrenica Massacre - Nova Srpska Politicka Misao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

(and Yugoslav territory) safely, but large numbers were killed in combat,<br />

and the Bosnian Serbs themselves claimed to have sustained the loss of<br />

as many as five hundred soldiers (see Chapters 2 and 3).<br />

<strong>The</strong> uncertainty as to the number and causes of the deaths provided<br />

an outstanding opportunity for fudging the data, helped along by the<br />

fact that the Bosnian Muslim government refused to provide the Red<br />

Cross with lists of those who had escaped to Bosnian Muslim lines.<br />

While this tactic was harsh on the soldiers’ relatives back in <strong>Srebrenica</strong><br />

and elsewhere in Bosnia, it facilitated the inflation of the numbers missing<br />

and possibly executed. <strong>The</strong> figure of 8,000 executed was initially<br />

based on an alleged 3,000 detained by the Bosnian Serbs, plus 5,000<br />

who fled <strong>Srebrenica</strong> toward Central Bosnia (see Chapter 4). It was reported<br />

at the time that a great many of the 5,000 did in fact reach their<br />

goal, but the refusal of the Bosnian Muslim government to give names<br />

made it possible to sustain the 8,000 number, which has held sway up<br />

to today.<br />

Subsequently, the figure of 8,000 was maintained by official assertions,<br />

backed by the testimony of witnesses, the evidence of grave sites,<br />

a rising number of DNA identifications, and newly adjusted lists of the<br />

missing (with the total remaining unchanged). But few if any witnesses<br />

who testified before the Tribunal saw actual executions—most provided<br />

hearsay evidence and most or all had a political or self-interested motive<br />

in making their claims. <strong>The</strong> most featured witness, Drazen Erdemovic,<br />

a Croat from Tuzla who served with the Bosnian Serb army, cited by<br />

name in the 1999 UN report on <strong>Srebrenica</strong>, and who, in May 1996, became<br />

the first person ever found guilty at the Tribunal on the basis of a<br />

plea-agreement, had initially avoided trial on the ground of mental instability—which<br />

did not rule out his testifying for the Tribunal, free of<br />

cross-examination, only weeks later. 5 Erdemovic was otherwise badly<br />

compromised, and gave testimony that was contradictory and unsupported<br />

by any hard evidence (see Chapters 4 and 5).<br />

An estimated “43 known <strong>Srebrenica</strong> related mass graves” had yielded<br />

some 2,600 bodies between 1996 and 2001. 6 <strong>The</strong> 448 blindfolds and<br />

423 ligatures reportedly recovered along with these bodies by forensic<br />

experts of the ICTY, genuine evidence of likely executions, represented<br />

a rate of roughly one for every six bodies, 7 but how many of the rest<br />

were executed or killed in fighting has never been established, and the<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!