05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 The Functional Groups of Micro-organisms and Biotech Products 129<br />

might be explained by degrading enzymes produced (Cody 1989) or another<br />

compound that would attack the fungus cell wall or inhibit the fungal growth.<br />

Probably, these enzymes and other metabolites are produced at a vegetative<br />

phase when B. thuringiensis multiplies, nevertheless, this does not happen in<br />

the soil (Thomas et al. 2000; Vilas Bôas et al. 2000). However, much of the cell<br />

contents were released during the cell/spores lysis after inoculation and could<br />

have a suppressor effect on soil microbiota.<br />

The B. thuringiensis effect on <strong>plant</strong> growth was observed only in <strong>plant</strong>s<br />

inoculated with Cry+ strain and ICP.Although the Cry+ strain inhibited mycorrhizal<br />

colonisation, <strong>plant</strong> growth was not affected, possibly because soil fertility<br />

status and nitrogen fixation were not affected by B. thuringiensis inoculum.<br />

The same results were found by Reddy and Rhae (1989) with B. subtilis<br />

and other rhizobacteria.<br />

AM fungi were suppressed by B. thuringiensis inoculum due to the use of<br />

spores as inoculum, but due to the fact that B. thuringiensis is found in low<br />

numbers in the rhizosphere, it is difficult to explain the inhibitory effect<br />

mechanism. Other authors (Andrade et al. 1995; Bethlenfalvay et al. 1997)<br />

found the same inhibitory effect by Bacillus spp. on mycorrhizae fungi<br />

colonising pea <strong>plant</strong>s. Some strains of Bacillus spp. can probably suppress the<br />

release of AM fungi and other soil microorganism cellular contents, but this<br />

subject needs more investigation to conclude the mechanisms involved.<br />

The present data provide evidence that B. thuringiensis inoculum does not<br />

produce an effect on <strong>plant</strong> growth when soil fertility is involved. However, B.<br />

thuringiensis var. Kurstaki HD1 demonstrated inhibitory effects on some<br />

functional groups of microorganisms that could be involved in deleterious<br />

effects in the field when the nutritional condition is oligotrophic. However,<br />

the cumulative effect of protein crystal was not evaluated. It should also be<br />

emphasised that the accumulative effect of the protein crystal due to successive<br />

cultivation of Bt-transgenic <strong>plant</strong>s has not yet been assessed, but some<br />

authors have suggested that there may be a deleterious effect on the microbiota<br />

(Saxena et al. 1999) and macrofauna (Donegan et al. 1997).<br />

The groups of soil functional microorganisms may be either positively or<br />

negatively affected by B. thuringiensis products, whether produced by bacteria<br />

or transgenic <strong>plant</strong>s. Up to now, the results obtained by microbial ecologists<br />

are still preliminary, and it is clear that exhaustive studies should be carried<br />

out before releasing these <strong>plant</strong>s into the environment. The dynamic of<br />

the functional groups of microorganisms in the presence of these <strong>plant</strong>s must<br />

be understood. In addition, the accumulative effect of the crystal on these<br />

microorganism groups should be assessed together with their subsequent<br />

effects on the bio-geochemical cycles. Confidence that Bt-<strong>plant</strong>s will not damage<br />

the environment when released for intense cultivation will be obtained<br />

after the positive or negative effects they may have on the environment are<br />

established.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!