05.02.2013 Views

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

plant surface microbiology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338<br />

M. Zakaria Solaiman and Lynette K. Abbott<br />

tions. Demonstrations of morphological and genetic diversity of AM fungi<br />

imply that the mechanism of symbiotic nutrient exchange might be diverse<br />

(Smith and Smith 1996), but the taxonomic diversity found might not necessarily<br />

be linked to the functional role of the AM fungi. Both inter- and intraspecific<br />

variation in the effectiveness of AM fungi has been reported (Franke-<br />

Snyder et al. 2001). Studies are required that show whether fungal diversity<br />

reflects quantitative rather than qualitative differences in functioning. The<br />

current understanding of functional diversity is that <strong>plant</strong>s can respond differently<br />

to different AM fungi, not only at the level of colonisation, nutrient<br />

uptake, growth, but also at the level of gene expression (Burleigh et al. 2002).<br />

4 Functional Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in<br />

Root and Hyphal Interactions<br />

Functional diversity of AM fungi associated with roots of <strong>plant</strong>s in different<br />

ecosystems is not well understood. The dynamics of interactions between<br />

roots and hyphae provide a framework for predicting how diversity of AM<br />

fungi might be related to mycorrhiza function, but it is difficult to measure. It<br />

is almost impossible to predict the functional diversity of AM fungi at an<br />

ecosystem level based simply on what fungi are present in soil. On a theoretical<br />

basis, the functional diversity of AM fungi under field conditions cannot<br />

be assumed to be directly correlated with a measure of diversity of AM fungi,<br />

even if the fungi present differ in P uptake and transfer under controlled conditions.<br />

This is because of differences in processes such as rate of root colonisation,<br />

interactions between fungi during colonisation and other strategies<br />

that include shutting down of hyphal infectivity in association with sporulation,<br />

as can occur for both S. calospora and A. laevis (Jasper et al. 1993; Pearson<br />

and Schweiger 1993).<br />

There is increasing interest in the potential role of AM fungi in influencing<br />

<strong>plant</strong> community structure (Read 1990; van der Heijden et al. 1998a, b;<br />

Klironomos 2002; Franke-Snyder et al. 2001). However, as yet there is little evidence<br />

to support the hypothesis that the diversity of AM fungi is an important<br />

factor influencing <strong>plant</strong> community structure under natural field conditions.<br />

This would require extensive quantification of AM fungi within roots for<br />

time-intervals that are of significance to <strong>plant</strong> and fungal growth cycles following<br />

an appropriate approach (Merryweather and Fitter 1998a, b). On the<br />

contrary, there is considerable potential for the <strong>plant</strong> communities to influence<br />

the fungal community structure through preferential effects on colonisation<br />

by particular fungi and influences on sporulation (Sanders and Fitter<br />

1992).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!